XU Xiaolan, LI Fei. Application of InSAR and DInSAR to Zhongba Earthquake[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2008, 33(7): 727-729.
Citation: XU Xiaolan, LI Fei. Application of InSAR and DInSAR to Zhongba Earthquake[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2008, 33(7): 727-729.

Application of InSAR and DInSAR to Zhongba Earthquake

Funds: 国家自然科学基金资助项目(40374005);山东省重点实验室开放研究基金资助项目(SD040210)
More Information
  • Received Date: April 29, 2008
  • Revised Date: April 29, 2008
  • Published Date: July 04, 2008
  • InSAR and differential interferometric synthetic aperture radar(D-InSAR) are generally introduced;Zhongba earthquake which occurred in July 12,2004 between Tibet Xigaze area Zhongba county and the Ngari area(northern latitude 30.5,east longitude 83.4°) with the Lishi magnitude 6.7 is selected as an example to obtain the coseismic deformation field with the two-pass differential interferometric processing method.The Okada elastic half space dislocation model is used to inverse inversion this earthquake's center of origin parameter,to obtain the focal mechanism solution.
  • Related Articles

    [1]YANG Jiuyuan, WEN Yangmao, XU Caijun. Seismogenic Fault Structure of the 2023 Ms 6.2 Jishishan (Gansu,China) Earthquake Revealed by InSAR Observations[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2025, 50(2): 313-321. DOI: 10.13203/j.whugis20230501
    [2]YANG Jiuyuan, XU Caijun. Ramp-flat Seismogenic Structure of the 2020 Yutian (Xinjiang, China) MW 6.3 Earthquake Revealed by InSAR Observations[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University. DOI: 10.13203/j.whugis20240482
    [3]WANG Yuexiang, WANG Teng. InSAR-Derived Coseismic Slip Model of the 2024 Ali Mw 5.6 Earthquake and Its Role on Landscape Evolution[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University. DOI: 10.13203/j.whugis20240453
    [4]YANG Jiuyuan, WEN Yangmao, XU Caijun. Coseismic Rupture Behavior of the 2024 Nima (Tibet) MW 6.0 Earthquake Revealed by InSAR Observations[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University. DOI: 10.13203/j.whugis20240243
    [5]LIU Yang, XU Caijun, WEN Yangmao, LI Zhicai. InSAR Inversion and Boundary Element Analysis of the Zadoi Mw 5.9 Earthquake Fault Slip[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2020, 45(11): 1678-1686. DOI: 10.13203/j.whugis20190368
    [6]LIU Yang, XU Caijun, WEN Yangmao. InSAR Observation of Menyuan Mw5.9 Earthquake Deformation and Deep Geometry of Regional Fault Zone[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2019, 44(7): 1035-1042. DOI: 10.13203/j.whugis20190069
    [7]ZHANG Qingyun, LI Yongsheng, LUO Yi, ZHANG Jingfa, YANG Jianqin. Source Parameters for the 2016 Mw 6.2 Italy Amatrice Earthquake Revealed by InSAR Observations[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2019, 44(1): 118-124. DOI: 10.13203/j.whugis20170252
    [8]WEN Yangmao, XU Caijun, LIU Yang, HE Ping. Source Parameters of 2008 Qinghai Dachaidan Mw 6.3 Earthquake from InSAR Inversion and Automated Fault Discretization Method[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2012, 37(4): 458-462.
    [9]XU Caijun, JIANG Guoyan, WANG Hao, WEN Yangmao. Analyzing InSAR Results Using GIS and Its Application on the Coseismic Interpretation of Mw7.9 Wenchuan Earthquake[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2011, 36(4): 379-383.
    [10]XU Caijun, WEN Yangmao. Nonhomogeneity of the Crust from Ms 7.9 Manyi(Tibet) Earthquake with InSAR Observation[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2008, 33(8): 846-849.

Catalog

    Article views (941) PDF downloads (378) Cited by()
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return