GENG Tao, ZHAO Pu, XIE Xin, CHENG Lingyue. Evaluation of GPS/BDS-3 Satellite Attitude Products and Impact on Precise Data Processing[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University. DOI: 10.13203/j.whugis20240155
Citation: GENG Tao, ZHAO Pu, XIE Xin, CHENG Lingyue. Evaluation of GPS/BDS-3 Satellite Attitude Products and Impact on Precise Data Processing[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University. DOI: 10.13203/j.whugis20240155

Evaluation of GPS/BDS-3 Satellite Attitude Products and Impact on Precise Data Processing

More Information
  • Received Date: June 06, 2024
  • Available Online: July 18, 2024
  • Objectives: Satellite attitudes have a significant impact on GNSS (global navigation satellite system) precise data processing. IGS (international GNSS service) analysis centers (ACs) have been publishing satellite attitude products in quaternion form using the ORBEX (ORBit EXchange) format. Methods: The GPS/BDS-3 satellite attitude products from 4 MGEX (multi-GNSS experiment) ACs spanning the year of 2023 are collected. Based on satellite attitude quaternions, the yaw angles of GPS/BDS-3 satellites were computed and compared using corresponding conversion formulas. The differences of yaw angles during the satellite yaw maneuvers were emphatically compared and analyzed. Then, the GPS/BDS-3 precise satellite clock estimation and precise point positioning were conducted using 122 global MGEX tracking stations, the impact of satellite yaw attitude on GPS/BDS-3 precise data processing was investigated by comparing the results using different attitude products. Results: Comparing the quaternion yaw angles from WUM (Wuhan university), GFZ (GeoForschungsZentrum), COD (center for orbit determination in Europe) and CNES (centre national d’etudes spatiales), we can find that different attitude models are adopted by different ACs during yaw maneuvers. The model adopted by GFZ differs significantly from others’, and the yaw angle differences can be up to 180° while abnormal jumps are observed. Except for GPS IIF satellites, the models adopted by WUM and COD are consistent in general. Compared with the nominal attitudes, attitude products can significantly improve the continuity of the GPS/BDS-3 satellite clock estimation and can reduce the standard deviation of the clock quadratic-differences by 85% when opposite yaw directions between the quaternion and nominal attitudes are observed. Kinematic precise point positioning (PPP) experiments show that inconsistent attitude models can cause positioning deviations by affecting the satellite antenna phase center offset and phase wind-up corrections. The attitude products can achieve 31%, 20%, and 28% accuracy improvements for the east, north, and up components, respectively, compared with the nominal attitudes. Conclusions: We recommend that users need to use satellite attitude products matching the corresponding orbit and clock products for GNSS precise data processing.
  • Related Articles

    [1]ZHU Shaolin, YUE Dongjie, HE Lina, CHEN Jian, LIU Shengnan. BDS-2/BDS-3 Joint Triple-Frequency Precise Point Positioning Models and Bias Characteristic Analysis[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2023, 48(12): 2049-2059. DOI: 10.13203/j.whugis20210273
    [2]GENG Jianghui, YAN Zhe, WEN Qiang. Multi-GNSS Satellite Clock and Bias Product Combination: The Third IGS Reprocessing Campaign[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2023, 48(7): 1070-1081. DOI: 10.13203/j.whugis20230071
    [3]LIU Mingliang, AN Jiachun, WANG Zemin, ZHANG Baojun, SONG Xiangyu. Performance Analysis of BDS-3 Multi-frequency Pseudorange Positioning[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2023, 48(6): 902-910. DOI: 10.13203/j.whugis20200714
    [4]YUAN Haijun, ZHANG Zhetao, HE Xiufeng, XU Tianyang, XU Xueyong. Stability Analysis of BDS-3 Satellite Differential Code Bias and Its Impacts on Single Point Positioning[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2023, 48(3): 425-432. DOI: 10.13203/j.whugis20200517
    [5]ZHOU Ren-yu, HU Zhi-gang, CAI Hong-liang, ZHAO Zhen, RAO Yong-nan, CHEN Liang, ZHAO Qi-le. Analysis of Pseudorange and Carrier Ranging Deviation of BDS-3 Using Parabolic Directional Antenna[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2021, 46(9): 1298-1308. DOI: 10.13203/j.whugis20200182
    [6]ZHANG Hui, HAO Jinming, LIU Weiping, ZHOU Rui, TIAN Yingguo. GPS/BDS Precise Point Positioning Model with Receiver DCB Parameters for Raw Observations[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2019, 44(4): 495-500, 592. DOI: 10.13203/j.whugis20170119
    [7]ZOU Xuan, LI Zongnan, CHEN Liang, LI Min, TANG Weiming, SHI Chuang. Modeling BeiDou IGSO and MEO Satellites Code Pseudorange Variations[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2018, 43(11): 1661-1666. DOI: 10.13203/j.whugis20160275
    [8]LI Xin, ZHANG Xiaohong, ZENG Qi, PAN Lin, ZHU Feng. The Estimation of BeiDou Satellite-induced Code Bias and Its Impact on the Precise Positioning[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2017, 42(10): 1461-1467. DOI: 10.13203/j.whugis20160062
    [9]LOU Yidong, GONG Xiaopeng, GU Shengfeng, ZHENG Fu, YI Wenting. The Characteristic and Effect of Code Bias Variations of BeiDou[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2017, 42(8): 1040-1046. DOI: 10.13203/j.whugis20150107
    [10]FAN Lei, ZHONG Shiming, LI Zishen, OU Jikun. Effect of Tracking Stations Distribution on the Estimation of Differential Code Biases by GPS Satellites Based on Uncombined Precise Point Positioning[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2016, 41(3): 316-321. DOI: 10.13203/j.whugis20140114
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(28)

    1. 吕峥,孙群,温伯威,张付兵,马京振. 顾及形状相似性的道路与居民地协同化简方法. 地球信息科学学报. 2024(05): 1270-1282 .
    2. 铁占琦. 利用改进的Hausdorff距离匹配多尺度线要素. 地理空间信息. 2024(05): 62-65 .
    3. 王庆社,王雅欣,姜青香,郭思慧. “天地图·北京”多源道路数据融合关键技术研究. 北京测绘. 2024(06): 874-879 .
    4. 陈钉均,梁芮嘉. 基于特征聚类驾驶员服从度跟驰模型参数标定. 计算机仿真. 2024(10): 126-132 .
    5. 齐杰,王中辉,李驿言. 基于图卷积神经网络的道路网匹配. 测绘通报. 2023(12): 19-24+44 .
    6. 吴冰娇,王中辉,杨飞. 用于多尺度道路网匹配的语义相似性计算模型. 测绘科学. 2022(03): 166-173 .
    7. 蒋阳升,俞高赏,胡路,李衍. 基于聚类站点客流公共特征的轨道交通车站精细分类. 交通运输系统工程与信息. 2022(04): 106-112 .
    8. 周秀华,李乃强. 基于多种相似度特征的道路实体融合方法. 测绘通报. 2021(08): 102-105+157 .
    9. 秦育罗,宋伟东,张在岩,孙小荣. 顾及几何特征和拓扑连续性的道路网匹配方法. 测绘通报. 2021(08): 55-60 .
    10. 杨飞,王中辉. 河系几何相似性的层次度量方法. 地球信息科学学报. 2021(12): 2139-2150 .
    11. 程绵绵,孙群,季晓林,赵云鹏. 改进平均Fréchet距离法及在化简评价中的应用. 测绘科学. 2020(03): 170-177 .
    12. 赵元棣,田英杰,吴佳馨. 航空器飞行轨迹相似性度量及聚类分析. 中国科技论文. 2020(02): 249-254 .
    13. Wenyue GUO,Anzhu YU,Qun SUN,Shaomei LI,Qing XU,Bowei WEN,Yuanfu LI. A Multisource Contour Matching Method Considering the Similarity of Geometric Features. Journal of Geodesy and Geoinformation Science. 2020(03): 76-87 .
    14. 秦育罗,郭冰,孙小荣. 改进Hausdorff距离及其在多尺度道路网匹配中的应用. 测绘科学技术学报. 2020(03): 313-318 .
    15. 郝志伟,李成名,殷勇,武鹏达,吴伟. 一种基于Fréchet距离的断裂等高线内插算法. 测绘通报. 2019(01): 65-68+74 .
    16. 郭文月,刘海砚,孙群,余岸竹,丁梓越. 顾及几何特征相似性的多源等高线匹配方法. 测绘学报. 2019(05): 643-653 .
    17. 宗琴,彭荃,秦万英. 一种基于模糊矩阵的空间面对象相似性度量算法. 北京测绘. 2019(10): 1218-1221 .
    18. 李兆兴,翟京生,武芳. 线要素综合的形状相似性评价方法. 武汉大学学报(信息科学版). 2019(12): 1859-1864 .
    19. 周家新,陈建勇,单志超,陈长康. 航空磁探中潜艇目标的联合估计检测方法研究. 兵工学报. 2018(05): 833-840 .
    20. 郭宁宁,盛业华,吕海洋,黄宝群,张思阳. 径向基函数神经网络的路网自动匹配算法. 测绘科学. 2018(03): 45-50 .
    21. 张瀚,李静,吕品,徐永志,刘格林. 六角格网的弧线矢量数据量化拟合方法. 计算机辅助设计与图形学学报. 2018(04): 557-567 .
    22. 邵世维,刘辉,肖立霞,王恒. 一种基于Fréchet距离的复杂线状要素匹配方法. 武汉大学学报(信息科学版). 2018(04): 516-521 .
    23. 苏满佳,张逸鸿,谢荣臻,朱海飞,管贻生,毛世鑫. 连续软体机器人的结构范型与形态复现. 机器人. 2018(05): 640-647+672 .
    24. 宗琴,姜树辉,刘艳霞. 多尺度矢量地图中模糊相似变换及其度量模型. 测绘科学. 2018(11): 72-78 .
    25. 郭文月,刘海砚,孙群,余岸竹,季晓林. 利用最长公共子序列度量线要素相似性的方法. 测绘科学技术学报. 2018(05): 518-523 .
    26. 郭宁宁,盛业华,黄宝群,吕海洋,张思阳. 基于人工神经网络的多特征因子路网匹配算法. 地球信息科学学报. 2016(09): 1153-1159 .
    27. 杨亚辉. 利用几何相似性快速测量鱼重的数学模型. 电子技术与软件工程. 2016(20): 182-183 .
    28. 逯跃锋,张奎,刘硕,吴跃,赵硕,李强,冯晨. 一种基于斜率差和方位角的矢量数据匹配算法. 山东大学学报(工学版). 2016(06): 31-39 .

    Other cited types(30)

Catalog

    Article views (157) PDF downloads (28) Cited by(58)
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return