DONG Chuankai, YU Facheng, ZHANG Weixing, FANG Lizhe, WEI Kangli, LOU Yidong, OU Shuyuan. Research on Improved GNSS-PWV Three Factor Threshold Rainfall Forecasting Method[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University. DOI: 10.13203/j.whugis20220798
Citation: DONG Chuankai, YU Facheng, ZHANG Weixing, FANG Lizhe, WEI Kangli, LOU Yidong, OU Shuyuan. Research on Improved GNSS-PWV Three Factor Threshold Rainfall Forecasting Method[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University. DOI: 10.13203/j.whugis20220798

Research on Improved GNSS-PWV Three Factor Threshold Rainfall Forecasting Method

More Information
  • Received Date: June 03, 2023
  • Available Online: July 19, 2023
  • Objectives: Precipitable water vapor (PWV) plays an increasingly significant role in the quantitative study of the potential meteorological factors that cause rainfall. The PWV-based three-factor (PWV, PWV change and rate of PWV change) threshold method for the rain forecast has been established, empirically proving its effectiveness in some scenarios. However, an apparent issue is that not fully using real-time information restricts performance. Our study proposed an improved monthly threshold method to tackle this problem. Methods: The basic idea is to refine the predictors. In this paper, the three-factor monthly threshold method based on PWV, PWV increment and rate of PWV increment is used to realize the short-term rainfall forecast within 6 hours, in which PWV is used as the main predictor, and PWV increment and PWV increase rate are used as secondary factors to assist in the prediction. We offer a quantitative standard for picking the threshold based on maximizing Critical Success Index (CSI). The specific prediction steps are as follows: (1) Get the time series of the three predictors from the raw data. Set a sliding window length of 6 hours, after calculating the PWV increment and rate of PWV increment under the current window, slide the window backwards for 30 minutes. By repeating the operations, we obtain the PWV increment sequence and the rate of PWV increment sequence; (2) Select the monthly threshold based on the data from 2015 to 2018. Set the optimal threshold for PWV according to CSI every month, then fix the threshold of PWV, and use the CSI maximum principle to select the optimal thresholds for PWV increment and the rate of PWV increment jointly; (3) Use the optimal threshold set on the 2019 data to predict the rainfall in the next 6 hours. If the PWV exceeds the threshold at a certain moment, predict rainfall; if the PWV does not exceed the threshold at a certain moment, but both the PWV increment and the rate of PWV increment exceed the threshold, predict rainfall; otherwise, predict no rainfall. Finally, the forecasted rainfall and actual rainfall are counted to calculate the correct rate (CR), false alarm rate (FAR) and CSI. Meanwhile, we explain that compared with using Probability of Detection (POD), it is more reasonable to use CR to evaluate the proportion of predicted rainfall events. Results: We apply our method to 11 different stations of SuomiNet. The CR of the improved method is above 89%, while the FAR is controlled below 73%. Among them the CR of the three stations P031, P047 and CN00 is about 95%, and the FAR is not higher than 65%. In general, the proposed method can predict more than 92% of rainfall on average, and the average FAR of each forecast is about 63%. Compared with the traditional three-factor algorithm, the average CR of the improved three-factor algorithm is increased by nearly 6%, the average FAR is reduced by more than 4%, and the average POD is at the same level. Conclusion: Using PWV increment and the rate of PWV increment, the new predictor can better reflect the characteristics of the rising phase of PWV and keep updating synchronously with PWV. Compared with the traditional method, our algorithm can predict rainfall more effectively and has higher applicability.
  • [1]
    Disaster Investigation Team of the State Council. Investigation Report on "7.20" Extraordinary Rainstorm Disaster in Zhengzhou, Henan[R]. Ministry of Emergency Management of the People's Republic of China, 2022.(河南郑州"7.20"特大暴雨灾害调查报告[R].中华人民共和国应急管理部, 2022)
    [2]
    Bretherton C S, Peters M E, Back L E. Relationships between Water Vapor Path and Precipitation over the Tropical Oceans[J]. Journal of Climate, 2004, 17(7):1517-1528.
    [3]
    Li G, Chen J, Hao L. Case Study of the Rainfall Processes in Different Cloud Systems Based on GPS-PWV Data in Chengdu Plain[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2011, 36(4):384-388(李国平, 陈娇娜, 郝丽萍. 基于GPS-PWV的不同云系降水个例的综合分析[J]. 武汉大学学报(信息科学版), 2011, 36(4):384-388)
    [4]
    Wang J, Zhang L, Dai A, Hove T V, Baelen J. A near-global, 2-hourly data set of atmospheric Precipitable water from ground-based GPS measurements[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 2007:Atmospheres 112(D11).
    [5]
    Chen Y, Liu Y, Wang X, et al. GPS Real-Time Estimation of Precipitable Water Vapor-Hong Kong Experiences[J]. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica, 2007, 36(1):9-12, 25(陈永奇,刘焱雄,王晓亚等.香港实时GPS水汽监测系统的若干关键技术[J].测绘学报,2007(1):9-12+25)
    [6]
    Shi C, Zhou L, Fan L, et al. Analysis of "21· 7" extreme rainstorm process in Henan Province using Beidou/GNSS observation. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2022, 65(1):186-196(施闯,周凌昊,范磊等.利用北斗/GNSS观测数据分析"21·7"河南极端暴雨过程[J].地球物理学报,2022,65(1):186-196)
    [7]
    Zhao Q, Du Z, Wu M, et al. Establishment of PWV Fusion Model Using Multisource Data. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2022, 47(11):1823-1831(赵庆志, 杜正, 吴满意,等. 利用多源数据构建PWV混合模型[J]. 武汉大学学报(信息科学版), 2022, 47(11):1823-1831)
    [8]
    Seco A, Ramírez F, Serna E, et al. Rain pattern analysis and forecast model based on GPS estimated atmospheric water vapor content[J]. Atmospheric environment, 2012, 49:85-93.
    [9]
    Wang G, Wang Z, Yang J. Ground-Based GPS Nearly Real-Time Inversion of Precipitable Water Vapor over Three Gorges Area. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2007, 32(9):761-763(王贵文, 王泽民, 杨剑. 地基GPS准实时反演三峡地区大气可降水量的研究[J]. 武汉大学学报(信息科学版), 2007, 32(9):761-763)
    [10]
    Bevis M, Businger S, Chiswell S, et al. GPS meteorology:Mapping zenith wet delays onto precipitable water[J]. Journal of Applied Meteorology, 1994:379-386.
    [11]
    Saastamoinen J. Atmospheric correction for the troposphere and stratosphere in radio ranging satellites[J]. The use of artificial satellites for geodesy, 1972, 15:247- 251.
    [12]
    Li X, Dick G, Lu C, et al. Multi-GNSS meteorology:real-time retrieving of atmospheric water vapor from BeiDou, Galileo, GLONASS, and GPS observations[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2015, 53(12):6385-6393.
    [13]
    Shi J, Xu C, Guo J, et al. Real-time GPS precise point positioning-based precipitable water vapor estimation for rainfall monitoring and forecasting[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2014, 53(6):3452-3459.
    [14]
    Benevides P, Catalao J, Miranda P M A. On the inclusion of GPS precipitable water vapour in the nowcasting of rainfall[J]. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 2015, 15(12):2605-2616.
    [15]
    Yao Y, Shan L, Zhao Q. Establishing a method of short-term rainfall forecasting based on GNSS-derived PWV and its application[J]. Sci Rep, 2017, 7:12465.
    [16]
    Shan L, Yao Y, Zhao Q, et al. A Short-term Rainfall Forecasting Method based on GNSS PWV Data[J]. Journal of Geomatics, 2019, 44(1):22-26(单路路,姚宜斌, 赵庆志, 等. 基于GNSS PWV的短临降雨预测方法[J]. 测绘地理信息, 2019, 44(1):22-26.)
    [17]
    Manandhar S, Lee Y H, Meng Y S. GPS-PWV Based Improved Long-Term Rainfall Prediction Algorithm for Tropical Regions[J]. Remote Sensing, 2019, 11(22):2643.
    [18]
    Li H, Wang X, Wu S, et al. A new method for determining an optimal diurnal threshold of GNSS precipitable water vapor for precipitation forecasting[J]. Remote Sensing, 2020, 13(7):1390.
    [19]
    Liu Y, Zhao Q, Yao W. Combining GNSS-derived PWV and meteorological parameters for short-term rainfall forecasting[C]//China Satellite Navigation Office Academic Exchange Center. Proceedings of the 11th China Satellite Navigation Conference-S01 Satellite Navigation Industry Applications, 2020:6(刘洋,赵庆志,姚顽强. 联合GNSS PWV与气象参数的短临降雨预测[C]//中国卫星导航系统管理办公室学术交流中心.第十一届中国卫星导航年会论文集——S01卫星导航行业应用, 2020:6)
    [20]
    Liu Y, Zhao Q, Yao W. Rainfall forecast based on multi-hidden layers neural network and GNSS-PWV[J]. Bulletin of Surveying and Mapping, 2019(S1):36-40(刘洋,赵庆志,姚顽强. 基于多隐层神经网络的GNSS PWV和气象数据的降雨预测研究[J]. 测绘通报, 2019(S1):36-40)
    [21]
    Biswas A N, Lee Y H, Manandhar S. Rainfall Forecasting Using GPS Derived Atmospheric Gradient and Residual for Tropical Region[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2021.
    [22]
    Zhao Q, Liu Y, Yao W, et al. Hourly rainfall forecast model using supervised learning algorithm[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2021, 60:1-9.
    [23]
    Ware R H, Fulker D W, Stein S A, et al. SuomiNet:A real-time national GPS network for atmospheric research and education[J]. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 2020, 81(4):677-694.
    [24]
    Doswell C A, Flueck J A. Forecasting and verifying in a field research project:DOPLIGHT'87[J]. Weather and forecasting, 1989, 4(2):97-109.
    [25]
    Donaldson R J, Dyer R M, Kraus M J. Objective evaluator of techniques for predicting severe weather events[J]. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 1975, 56(7):755-755.
  • Related Articles

    [1]HUANG Bohua, YANG Bohang, LI Minggui, GUO Zhongkai, MAO Jianyou, WANG Hong. An Improved Method for MAD Gross Error Detection of Clock Error[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2022, 47(5): 747-752. DOI: 10.13203/j.whugis20190430
    [2]WANG Leyang, GU Wangwang, ZHAO Xiong, XU Guangyu, GAO Hua. Determination of Relative Weight Ratio of Joint Inversion Using Bias-Corrected Variance Component Estimation Method[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2022, 47(4): 508-516. DOI: 10.13203/j.whugis20200216
    [3]IA Lei, LAI Zulong, MEI Changsong, JIAO Chenchen, JIANG Ke, PAN Xiong. An Improved Algorithm for Real-Time Cycle Slip Detection and Repair Based on TurboEdit Epoch Difference Model[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2021, 46(6): 920-927. DOI: 10.13203/j.whugis20190287
    [4]ZHAO Jianhu, WU Jingwen, ZHAO Xinglei, ZHOU Fengnian. A Correction Model for Depth Bias in Airborne LiDAR Bathymetry Systems[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2019, 44(3): 328-333. DOI: 10.13203/j.whugis20160481
    [5]LU Tieding, YANG Yuanxi, ZHOU Shijian. Comparative Analysis of MDB for Different Outliers Detection Methods[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2019, 44(2): 185-192, 199. DOI: 10.13203/j.whugis20140330
    [6]LOU Yidong, GONG Xiaopeng, GU Shengfeng, ZHENG Fu, YI Wenting. The Characteristic and Effect of Code Bias Variations of BeiDou[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2017, 42(8): 1040-1046. DOI: 10.13203/j.whugis20150107
    [7]SUN Wenchuan, BAO Jingyang, JIN Shaohua, XIAO Fumin, ZHANG Zhiwei. A Re-calibration Method for Roll Bias of Multi-beam Sounding System[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2016, 41(11): 1440-1444. DOI: 10.13203/j.whugis20140481
    [8]ZOU Qin, LI Qingquan. Target-points MST for Pavement Crack Detection[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2011, 36(1): 71-75.
    [9]HUANG Xianyuan, ZHAI Guojun, SUI Lifen, HUANG Motao. Application of Least Square Support Vector Machine to Detecting Outliers of Multi-beam Data[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2010, 35(10): 1188-1191.
    [10]XU Caijun, WANG Jianglin. Linear Minimum Mean Square Error Estimation for Wet Delay Correction in SAR Interferogram[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2007, 32(9): 757-760.

Catalog

    Article views (473) PDF downloads (67) Cited by()
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return