WANG Jianjun, XU Caijun, SHEN Wenbin. The Coseismic Coulomb Stress Changes Induced by the 2010 Mw 6.9 Yushu Earthquake,China and Its Implication to Earthquake Hazards[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2012, 37(10): 1207-1211.
Citation: WANG Jianjun, XU Caijun, SHEN Wenbin. The Coseismic Coulomb Stress Changes Induced by the 2010 Mw 6.9 Yushu Earthquake,China and Its Implication to Earthquake Hazards[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2012, 37(10): 1207-1211.

The Coseismic Coulomb Stress Changes Induced by the 2010 Mw 6.9 Yushu Earthquake,China and Its Implication to Earthquake Hazards

Funds: 中国博士后科学基金资助项目(180783);;高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金资助项目(20110141130010,20090141110055);;中央高校自主科研基金资助项目(274575,114035);;地球空间环境与大地测量教育部重点实验室开放研究基金资助项目(10020)
More Information
  • Received Date: August 21, 2011
  • Published Date: October 04, 2012
  • We here investigate the coseismic Coulomb stress change and seismicity rate induced by the 2010 Mw 6.9 Yushu earthquake in order to deepen our understanding of the behavior of stress triggering among its foreshock,mainshock and aftershocks and to further make an assessment of the occurrence of potential earthquakes in its surrounding region and on major active faults.Our results show that: 1) the pattern of aftershocks of the Mw 6.9 Yushu earthquake is consistent with the spatial distribution of coseismic Coulomb stress changes with an aftershock triggering rate of 76.47%;2)For this 2010 Yushu earthquake sequence of foreshock-mainshock-aftershock type,the Mw 4.9 foreshock has little contribution to the occurrence of the Mw 6.9 Yushu mainshock,whilst the triggering causality between the Mw 6.9 Yushu mainshock and the Mw 6.1 aftershock is well pronounced;3) the Coseismic Coulomb stress changes are loaded on the portions of Ganzi-Yushu fault such as the Dangjiang and Haxiu segments which have been ruptured by the 1738 M 7.5 earthquake and the Dengke segment of the 1896 M 7.3 earthquake as well as the southeastern unruptured extension from the end of the Mw 6.9 earthquake termination,and thus they all pose high earthquake hazards in the near future.
  • Related Articles

    [1]ZHANG Wenting, JI Lingyun, CHEN Yuxin, LIU Chuanjin, XU Jing. Analysis of Crustal Deformation of the 2023 Ms 6.2 Jishishan Earthquake in Gansu Province, China[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2025, 50(2): 391-403. DOI: 10.13203/j.whugis20240012
    [2]NAI Yihan, HAN Bingquan, LIU Zhenjiang, LI Zhenhong, SONG Chuang, YU Chen, LI Suju, PENG Jianbing. Coseismic Surface Displacement and Source Model of the 2024 Mw 7.0 Wushi (Xinjiang, China) Earthquake Revealed by InSAR Observations[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2025, 50(2): 368-376. DOI: 10.13203/j.whugis20240037
    [3]LIU Zhenjiang, HAN Bingquan, NAI Yihan, LI Zhenhong, YU Chen, SONG Chuang, CHEN Bo, ZHAO Lijiang, ZHANG Xuesong, PENG Jianbing. Source Parameters and Slip Distribution of the 2023 Mw 6.0 Jishishan (Gansu, China) Earthquake Constrained by InSAR Observations[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2025, 50(2): 344-355. DOI: 10.13203/j.whugis20240008
    [4]YANG Jiuyuan, WEN Yangmao, XU Caijun. Seismogenic Fault Structure of the 2023 Ms 6.2 Jishishan (Gansu,China) Earthquake Revealed by InSAR Observations[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2025, 50(2): 313-321. DOI: 10.13203/j.whugis20230501
    [5]TANG Lei, QIU Zehua, LI Yujiang, LI Yu, FAN Junyi. Determination and Analysis of Near-Surface Stress-Strain State of 4-Component Borehole Strainmeter[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2025, 50(1): 63-73. DOI: 10.13203/j.whugis20220397
    [6]MA Shenglong, ZHOU Yu, SHEN Xuzhang. Analysis of Le Teil Earthquake in France and Its Correlation with Le Teil Quarry Extraction Using Sentinel-1 and Topographic Data[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2024, 49(7): 1190-1200. DOI: 10.13203/j.whugis20210248
    [7]YANG Jiuyuan, WEN Yangmao, XU Caijun. Coseismic Rupture Behavior of the 2024 Nima (Tibet) MW 6.0 Earthquake Revealed by InSAR Observations[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University. DOI: 10.13203/j.whugis20240243
    [8]JIANG Ying, LIU Ziwei, ZHANG Xiaotong, ZHANG Lina, WEI Jin. Variation Features of b-Value Before and After the 2021 Maduo Mw 7.4 Earthquake[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2022, 47(6): 907-915. DOI: 10.13203/j.whugis20220071
    [9]LI Zhenhong, HAN Bingquan, LIU Zhenjiang, ZHANG Miaomiao, YU Chen, CHEN Bo, LIU Haihui, DU Jing, ZHANG Shuangcheng, ZHU Wu, ZHANG Qin, PENG Jianbing. Source Parameters and Slip Distributions of the 2016 and 2022 Menyuan, Qinghai Earthquakes Constrained by InSAR Observations[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2022, 47(6): 887-897. DOI: 10.13203/j.whugis20220037
    [10]XU Caijun, WANG Jianjun, XIONG Wei. Retrospection and Perspective for Earthquake Stress Triggering[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2018, 43(12): 2085-2092. DOI: 10.13203/j.whugis20180149

Catalog

    Article views (1120) PDF downloads (393) Cited by()
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return