XU Caijun, WANG Hua. Comparison of InSAR Phase Unwrapping Algorithms and Error Analysis[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2004, 29(1): 67-71.
Citation:
XU Caijun, WANG Hua. Comparison of InSAR Phase Unwrapping Algorithms and Error Analysis[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2004, 29(1): 67-71.
XU Caijun, WANG Hua. Comparison of InSAR Phase Unwrapping Algorithms and Error Analysis[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2004, 29(1): 67-71.
Citation:
XU Caijun, WANG Hua. Comparison of InSAR Phase Unwrapping Algorithms and Error Analysis[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2004, 29(1): 67-71.
Comparison of InSAR Phase Unwrapping Algorithms and Error Analysis
This paper compares three kinds of phase unwrapping algorithms, residue-cut algorithm, leastsquare algorithm and statistical-cost network-flow algorithm.From the comparison, it can be concluded that Goldstein residue-cut method is superior to the least-squares method, both in calculation efficiency and in unwrapping precision.Lastly, the height error caused by the bias of unwrapped phase is analyzed.
DownLoad: