Wang Mi, Chang Xueli, Zhu Ying, Ying Hexiang, Cheng Shiwen. Comparison of Three Gross Error Detection Methods in Automatic Geometric Correction for Optical Satellite Images[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2014, 39(12): 1395-1400.
Citation: Wang Mi, Chang Xueli, Zhu Ying, Ying Hexiang, Cheng Shiwen. Comparison of Three Gross Error Detection Methods in Automatic Geometric Correction for Optical Satellite Images[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2014, 39(12): 1395-1400.

Comparison of Three Gross Error Detection Methods in Automatic Geometric Correction for Optical Satellite Images

More Information
  • Received Date: April 06, 2014
  • Published Date: December 04, 2014
  • Control point gross error detection is a critical step that guarantees the geometric correction accuracy of optical satellite images during automatic geometric correction.This paper focuses on comparison and analysis of the three classical gross error detection methods;data snooping,robust estimation(iteration method with variable weights) and random sample consensus(RANSAC).First,the steps of the three methods are described in detail.Next,gross error detection experiments using the three methods conducted with different gross error rates,i. e.10%,20%,30%and 60%,respectively are reported.These experimental results show that RANSAC is more robust and less sensitive to the gross error rate than data snooping and robust estimation and therefore the most appropriate method for gross error detection in automatic geometric correction.
  • Related Articles

    [1]DUAN Xinqiao, GE Yong, ZHANG Tong, LI Lin, TAN Yongbin. Direct Algorithm for the Exact Voronoi Diagram on Discrete Topographic Space[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2023, 48(5): 799-806. DOI: 10.13203/j.whugis20210566
    [2]YU Liebing, XIANG Longgang, SUN Shangyu, GUAN Xuefeng, WU Huayi. kNN Query Processing for Trajectory Big Data Based on Distributed Column-Oriented Storage[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2021, 46(5): 736-745. DOI: 10.13203/j.whugis20200136
    [3]LI Jian, CAO Yao, WANG Zongmin, WANG Guangyin. Scattered Point Cloud Simplification Algorithm Integrating k-means Clustering and Hausdorff Distance[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2020, 45(2): 250-257. DOI: 10.13203/j.whugis20180204
    [4]YANG Jun, LIN Yanlong, ZHANG Ruifeng, WANG Xiaopeng. A Fast Algorithm for Finding k-nearest Neighbors of Large-Scale Scattered Point Cloud[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2016, 41(5): 656-664. DOI: 10.13203/j.whugis20140191
    [5]CHEN Xijiang, HUA Xianghong, YANG Ronghua, ZHANG Qinghua. Planar Target Location Based on the Zoning K-means Clustering[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2013, 38(2): 167-170.
    [6]MA Juan, FANG Yuanmin, ZHAO Wenliang. Algorithm for Finding k-Nearest Neighbors Based on Spatial Sub-cubes and Dynamic Sphere[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2011, 36(3): 358-362.
    [7]WANG Haijun, DENG Yu, WANG Li, GUAN Xingliang. A C-means Algorithm Based on Data Field[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2009, 34(5): 626-629.
    [8]HAN Yuanli, WANG Haijun, XIA Wenfang. A New Urban Land Classification Model Based on k-order Data Field of Point Set[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2009, 34(3): 370-373.
    [9]LI Guangqiang, DENG Min, ZHU Jianjun. Spatial Association Rules Mining Methods Based on Voronoi Diagram[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2008, 33(12): 1242-1245.
    [10]HAN Yuanli, HU Peng, XIA Wenfang, ZHANG Lihua. Existence Determination About k-order Voronoi Diagram of Point Set[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2007, 32(9): 833-837.

Catalog

    Article views (1184) PDF downloads (742) Cited by()
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return