WANG Xiaolong, YAN Haowen, LI Jingzhong, XIE Yaowen, WANG Zhuo, MA Wenjun, YANG Qili. DDM: A Direction-Distance Model for We-Map Assistance Wayfinding[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University. DOI: 10.13203/j.whugis20240072
Citation: WANG Xiaolong, YAN Haowen, LI Jingzhong, XIE Yaowen, WANG Zhuo, MA Wenjun, YANG Qili. DDM: A Direction-Distance Model for We-Map Assistance Wayfinding[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University. DOI: 10.13203/j.whugis20240072

DDM: A Direction-Distance Model for We-Map Assistance Wayfinding

More Information
  • Received Date: June 02, 2024
  • Available Online: June 23, 2024
  • Objectives: Existing models/ algorithms for the users of wayfinding focus on the landmark weight or the shortest route in we-map, which leads to the important information (e.g. direction and distance) was ignored and did not meet the certain requirements (e.g. the contents in maps is enough totally when decision-making using maps, but meanwhile, there is no redundant information to disturb their decision). To address this issue, a direction-distance model (DDM) for we-map assistance wayfinding is proposed, aiming at providing more detailed information to help the users to make decisions regarding wayfinding. Methods: First, the features of we-map were clarified, aiming at discussing representative relations between the characteristics of the we-map and aid wayfinding. According to the discussion results, it was compared with landmarks and direction-distance viewed as the core objects of we-map, and lastly the direction and distance relations were determined as core objects of we-map. Then, an example was discussed to explain how to meet a specific feature of we-map (i.e. the objects in we-map are totally enough when decision-making using maps, but meanwhile, there is no redundant information to disturb their decision). The specific reason why the traditional direction model cannot be utilized the we-maps, is the traditional direction model has redundant information disturbing users' decisions when wayfinding using maps. Last, a quantification model is built by calculating the azimuth of the path data, and the qualification model is developed to describe the results of the quantification model based on the eight-direction cone model. the method for calculation of the path distance is designed to obtain distance information, and the length function for the road segments and segments are defined combined with the Euclidean distance to compute path distance based on the sum function. Results: The experimental results show that, (1) proposed model can avoid the calculation redundancy, (2) the time complexity is superior compared with the existing spatial direction models, (3) spatial direction relations were described qualitatively and quantitively, as well as (4) the missing information of the direction and distance was added and provided during the dynamic process of the users' wayfinding. Conclusions: A direction-distance model was proposed to solve the problem of important information being ignored and certain requirements not being met. This model can provide more detailed direction and distance information for users when wayfinding using maps, but there is no other redundant information to disturb their decision.
  • Related Articles

    [1]WANG Li, LI Yi, SHU Bao, TIAN Yunqing, WANG Bingjie. RAIM Performance Analysis of Three Typical Low-Orbit Augmentation Constellations Combined with BDS Applications[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2023, 48(5): 678-686. DOI: 10.13203/j.whugis20210567
    [2]TAN Han, WU Jiaqi. Accuracy Assessment for LEO Precise Orbit Determination with Single-Difference Ambiguity Resolution[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2022, 47(9): 1460-1469. DOI: 10.13203/j.whugis20200385
    [3]YANG Yufei, YANG Yuanxi, XU Junyi, XU Yangyin, ZHAO Ang. Navigation Satellites Orbit Determination with the Enhancement of Low Earth Orbit Satellites[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2020, 45(1): 46-52. DOI: 10.13203/j.whugis20180215
    [4]WANG Lei, CHEN Ruizhi, LI Deren, YU Baoguo, WU Cailun. Quality Assessment of the LEO Navigation Augmentation Signals from Luojia-1A Satellite[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2018, 43(12): 2191-2196. DOI: 10.13203/j.whugis20180413
    [5]LEI Yu, ZHAO Danning, CAI Hongbing. Prediction of Navigation Satellite Clock Offset by Adaptive Extreme Learning Machine[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2018, 43(5): 664-668, 718. DOI: 10.13203/j.whugis20150252
    [6]LI Xiaojie, PAN Ling, GUO Rui, SU Ranran, ZHU Lingfeng, DONG Enqiang, TANG Guifen. A Method of Improving Orbit Prediction for Navigation Satellite Based on Adjusting Compensable Wave[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2017, 42(8): 1061-1067. DOI: 10.13203/j.whugis20150078
    [7]wang yupu, lv zhiping,  cui yang,  lv hao,  li linyang. predicting navigation  satellite clock bias using agenetic wavelet neural network[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2014, 39(7): 809-814.
    [8]HAN Baomin. Densification Methods of GPS Satellite Clock Errors and Their Impact on Orbit Determination Precision of LEOs[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2006, 31(12): 1075-1078.
    [9]GUO Jinlai, ZHAO Qile, GUO Daoyu. Reducing the Influence of Gravity Model Error on Precise Orbit Determination of Low Earth Orbit Satellites[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2006, 31(4): 293-296.
    [10]LIANG Yitong, HU Jianglin. Application of Neural Network Technique to Classification of NOAA Satellite Images[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2000, 25(2): 148-152.

Catalog

    Article views PDF downloads Cited by()
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return