LI Baojin, XUE Shuqiang, XIAO Zhen, ZHU Jixing. Inversion of Sound Speed Profile using GNSS-A Observations with Prior Sound Speed Structure Constraint[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University. DOI: 10.13203/j.whugis20240005
Citation: LI Baojin, XUE Shuqiang, XIAO Zhen, ZHU Jixing. Inversion of Sound Speed Profile using GNSS-A Observations with Prior Sound Speed Structure Constraint[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University. DOI: 10.13203/j.whugis20240005

Inversion of Sound Speed Profile using GNSS-A Observations with Prior Sound Speed Structure Constraint

More Information
  • Received Date: June 10, 2024
  • Available Online: July 18, 2024
  • Objectives: Implementing in-field sound speed profile (SSP) measurement not only increases the cost of seafloor geodetic observation but also constrains the timeliness of various seafloor geodetic monitoring activities. Inverting SSP based on observational information is an effective approach to replacing in-field SSP measurement. Methods: Using the publicly available GNSS-A observation dataset from the Japan Coast Guard, this paper comparatively analyzes the influence of three different constraint schemes on the accuracy of inverting SSP for the Munk model, bilinear model, and self-constructed empirical model, as well as their influence on the precision of seafloor geodetic positioning. Results: The self-constructed empirical model generally has relatively higher inversion accuracy. The RMS of the difference between the model and in-field measured SSPs is about 5 m/s in shallow waters from 10 to 1000 meters and about 1 m/s in deep waters from 1000 to 1727.80 meters. The inversion accuracy in full-depth waters is relatively highest when the sea surface is moderately constrained and the seafloor gradient is loosely constrained. When parameterizing the estimation of sound speed spatial-temporal variation compensation parameters in the ray tracing positioning model, the inversion SSPs from the self-constructed empirical model have the highest relative positioning accuracy under conditions of appropriate sea surface constraints. The RMS of difference between these profiles and the in-field measured SSP positioning results are 2 mm, 2 mm, and 2.2 cm in the E, N, and U directions, respectively. Conclusions: To achieve high-precision positioning of the inverted SSP, it is necessary to consider the spatialtemporal variation of sound speed in the positioning model. It is recommended to utilize a selfconstructed empirical model with appropriate sea surface constraints and loose seafloor gradient constraints and a two-level optimization method to achieve seafloor geodetic positioning without in-field SSP.
  • Related Articles

    [1]WANG Li, LI Yi, SHU Bao, TIAN Yunqing, WANG Bingjie. RAIM Performance Analysis of Three Typical Low-Orbit Augmentation Constellations Combined with BDS Applications[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2023, 48(5): 678-686. DOI: 10.13203/j.whugis20210567
    [2]TAN Han, WU Jiaqi. Accuracy Assessment for LEO Precise Orbit Determination with Single-Difference Ambiguity Resolution[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2022, 47(9): 1460-1469. DOI: 10.13203/j.whugis20200385
    [3]YANG Yufei, YANG Yuanxi, XU Junyi, XU Yangyin, ZHAO Ang. Navigation Satellites Orbit Determination with the Enhancement of Low Earth Orbit Satellites[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2020, 45(1): 46-52. DOI: 10.13203/j.whugis20180215
    [4]WANG Lei, CHEN Ruizhi, LI Deren, YU Baoguo, WU Cailun. Quality Assessment of the LEO Navigation Augmentation Signals from Luojia-1A Satellite[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2018, 43(12): 2191-2196. DOI: 10.13203/j.whugis20180413
    [5]LEI Yu, ZHAO Danning, CAI Hongbing. Prediction of Navigation Satellite Clock Offset by Adaptive Extreme Learning Machine[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2018, 43(5): 664-668, 718. DOI: 10.13203/j.whugis20150252
    [6]LI Xiaojie, PAN Ling, GUO Rui, SU Ranran, ZHU Lingfeng, DONG Enqiang, TANG Guifen. A Method of Improving Orbit Prediction for Navigation Satellite Based on Adjusting Compensable Wave[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2017, 42(8): 1061-1067. DOI: 10.13203/j.whugis20150078
    [7]wang yupu, lv zhiping,  cui yang,  lv hao,  li linyang. predicting navigation  satellite clock bias using agenetic wavelet neural network[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2014, 39(7): 809-814.
    [8]HAN Baomin. Densification Methods of GPS Satellite Clock Errors and Their Impact on Orbit Determination Precision of LEOs[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2006, 31(12): 1075-1078.
    [9]GUO Jinlai, ZHAO Qile, GUO Daoyu. Reducing the Influence of Gravity Model Error on Precise Orbit Determination of Low Earth Orbit Satellites[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2006, 31(4): 293-296.
    [10]LIANG Yitong, HU Jianglin. Application of Neural Network Technique to Classification of NOAA Satellite Images[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2000, 25(2): 148-152.

Catalog

    Article views PDF downloads Cited by()
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return