LIU Meng, WANG Zheng-tao. Downward Continuation Iterative Regularization Solution Based on Quasi Optimal Regularization Factor Set[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University. DOI: 10.13203/j.whugis20230127
Citation: LIU Meng, WANG Zheng-tao. Downward Continuation Iterative Regularization Solution Based on Quasi Optimal Regularization Factor Set[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University. DOI: 10.13203/j.whugis20230127

Downward Continuation Iterative Regularization Solution Based on Quasi Optimal Regularization Factor Set

More Information
  • Received Date: October 30, 2023
  • Available Online: May 12, 2024
  • Objectives: Iterative Tikhonov regularization and iterative Landweber regularization are currently the two most commonly used iterative regularization algorithms, which can effectively solve the ill-posed problem during the continuation process. However, their optimal combination of iteration times and regularization parameters has not yet been determined, which limits their practicality. Methods: This paper constructs the concept of quasi-optimal regularization factor set and analyzes the distribution of iteration numbers and regularization parameters in the quasi-optimal regularization factor set. Based on this, a selection criterion for the optimal combination of iteration number and regularization parameter in iterative regularization algorithms is proposed, and a formula for using the L-curve method to obtain the optimal regularization parameter corresponding to the number of iterations is provided. Results: The study on the relationship between the extension error of iterative regularization algorithms and the variation of regularization factor sets shows that there is a significant correlation between the optimal regularization parameters and the number of iterations in the quasi optimal regularization factor set. When the number of iterations exceeds 10, the extension solutions corresponding to each quasi optimal regularization factor set are basically identical. When the number of iterations is large enough, any quasi optimal regularization factor set can be considered as the optimal regularization factor set. The iterative regularization algorithm based on the selected strategy in this article has a smoother extension solution and smaller error compared to the traditional Tikhonov regularization method. However, in areas with significant data changes, some high-frequency signals are filtered out as noise, and the extension effect is not significantly improved. Conclusions: The iterative regularization algorithm based on the selected strategy in this article has a smoother and smaller error extension solution compared to the traditional Tikhonov regularization method, which shows reliability and practicality.
  • Related Articles

    [1]XU Xinqiang, ZHAO Jun. A Multi-Parameter Regularization Method in Downward Continuation for Airborne Gravity Data[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2020, 45(7): 956-963, 973. DOI: 10.13203/j.whugis20180335
    [2]BIAN Shaofeng, WU Zemin. Optimal Tikhonov Regularization Matrix and Its Application in GNSS Ambiguity Resolution[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2019, 44(3): 334-339. DOI: 10.13203/j.whugis20160474
    [3]CUI Shengcheng, ZHU Wenyue, YANG Shizhi, LI Xuebin. Regularization-Based Retrieval Method for Surface Reflective Property Parameters[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2018, 43(8): 1264-1270. DOI: 10.13203/j.whugis20160244
    [4]CHEN Xin, ZHAI Guojun, BAO Jingyang, OUYANG Yongzhong, LU Xiuping, DENG Kailiang. Least Squares Collocation-Tikhonov Regularization Method for the Downward Continuation of Airborne Gravity Data[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2018, 43(4): 578-585. DOI: 10.13203/j.whugis20150728
    [5]ZENG Xiaoniu, LIU Daizhi, LI Xihai, SU Juan, CHEN Dingxin, QI Wei. An Improved Singular Value Modification Method for Ill-posed Problems[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2015, 40(10): 1349-1353. DOI: 10.13203/j.whugis20130709
    [6]LIU Bin, GONG Jianya, JIANG Wanshou, ZHU Xiaoyong. Improvement of the Iteration by Correcting Characteristic Value Based on Ridge Estimation and Its Application in RPC Calculating[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2012, 37(4): 399-402.
    [7]WANG Zhenjie, OU Jikun, LIU Lintao. A Method for Resolving Ill-conditioned Problems——Two-Step Solution[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2005, 30(9): 821-824.
    [8]WANG Zhenjie, OU Jikun, QU Guoqing, HAN Baomin. Determining the Smoothing Parameter in Semi-parametric Model Using L-curve Method[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2004, 29(7): 651-653.
    [9]WANG Zhenjie, OU Jikun. Determining the Ridge Parameter in a Ridge Estimation Using L-curve Method[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2004, 29(3): 235-238.
    [10]XU Tianhe, YANG Yuanxi. Robust Tikhonov Regularization Method and Its Applications[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2003, 28(6): 719-722.

Catalog

    Article views (51) PDF downloads (21) Cited by()
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return