ZHOU Yangmei, LIU Jingnan, LI Xin. Rigor Method on Evaluating the Rightness for the Integer Solution of GPS Carried-phase Ambiguity[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2004, 29(11): 1004-1007.
Citation: ZHOU Yangmei, LIU Jingnan, LI Xin. Rigor Method on Evaluating the Rightness for the Integer Solution of GPS Carried-phase Ambiguity[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2004, 29(11): 1004-1007.

Rigor Method on Evaluating the Rightness for the Integer Solution of GPS Carried-phase Ambiguity

More Information
  • Received Date: June 09, 2004
  • Published Date: November 04, 2004
  • This paper points out the theoretic pitfall caused by evaluating the rightness of integer ambiguity solution based on the three-step approach of the traditional hypothesis test theory, and introduces the concept of the pull-in region for ambiguity and the definition of the admissible integer estimation. On the basis of the original definition for the admissible integer estimation, a new severer definition is given. On the basis of this new definition of the admissible integer estimation, the concept of ambiguity success rate is discussed and the corresponding formulas are deduced.
  • Related Articles

    [1]LIU Shuo, ZHANG Lei, LI Jian. A Modified Wide Lane Bootstrapping Ambiguity Resolution Algorithm[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2018, 43(4): 637-642. DOI: 10.13203/j.whugis20150462
    [2]SHU Bao, LIU Hui, ZHANG Jinsheng, PAN Guofu, JIANG Jun. Performance Assessment of Partial Ambiguity Resolution Based on BDS/GPS Combined Positioning[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2017, 42(7): 989-994, 1001. DOI: 10.13203/j.whugis20150017
    [3]LIU Shuai, SUN Fuping, LI Haifeng, LIU Jing, HAO Wanliang. GLONASS Aided Ambiguity Fixing for Kinematic GPS PPP[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2016, 41(9): 1238-1244. DOI: 10.13203/j.whugis20140494
    [4]ZHANG Liang, LV Hanfeng, WU Jie. Sin gle  Epoch Ambiguit y Resolution Success Rates Under Modified Objective  Function Without Prior Baseline Information[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2014, 39(10): 1184-1188.
    [5]LIU Jingnan, DENG Chenlong, TANG Weiming. Review of GNSS Ambiguity Validation Theory[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2014, 39(9): 1009-1016. DOI: 10.13203/j.whugis20140241
    [6]WU Yue, FU Xiaolin, LI Haijun, LIU Jingbin. Application of TCAR/MCAR Method in Different Baseline Ambiguity Resolution[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2007, 32(2): 172-175.
    [7]LI Deren, PENG Mingjun, . Transformation Between Urban Spatial Information Irregular Grid and Regular Grid[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2007, 32(2): 160-163.
    [8]WANG Xinzhou, HUA Xianghong, QIU Lei. A New Method for Integer Ambiguity Resolution in GPS Deformation Monitoring[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2007, 32(1): 24-26.
    [9]REN Chao, OU Jikun, YUAN Yunbin. A New Method for GPS Ambiguity Resolution on-the-Fly Using Integer Whitening Filter Search[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2004, 29(11): 960-963.
    [10]P. J. G. Teunissen. A New Class of GNSS Ambiguity Estimators[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2004, 29(9): 757-762.

Catalog

    Article views (732) PDF downloads (195) Cited by()
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return