LI Xiaotian, XIE Lei, JIANG Kun, SHAN Baojun, ZHU Lingjie, XU Wenbin. A joint M-estimation and bayesian estimation method for DS-InSAR deformation estimation[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University. DOI: 10.13203/j.whugis20240125
Citation: LI Xiaotian, XIE Lei, JIANG Kun, SHAN Baojun, ZHU Lingjie, XU Wenbin. A joint M-estimation and bayesian estimation method for DS-InSAR deformation estimation[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University. DOI: 10.13203/j.whugis20240125

A joint M-estimation and bayesian estimation method for DS-InSAR deformation estimation

More Information
  • Received Date: June 20, 2024
  • Available Online: July 18, 2024
  • Objectives: Distributed scatterers interferometry (DS-InSAR) significantly increases the number of coherent target pixels in non-urban areas without losing spatial resolution. However, there remains a challenge in balancing the quantity of coherent targets with the accuracy of deformation estimation in conventional DS-InSAR method. To address this issue, we propose a new DS-InSAR method that integrates M-estimation and Bayesian estimation (MB-InSAR). Methods: The method proposes a three-arc strategy to construct the Persistent Scatterer-Disctributed Scatterer (PS-DS) arcs network, which provides a more accurate prior distribution for the DS estimator. Subsequently, the DS points are divided into different categories based on interpolation errors through the velocity interpolation variance. The points with small interpolation errors are solved based on weighted Bayesian estimation, while the remains with large interpolation error are solved based on M-estimation. Results: Applications on simulated datasets demonstrate that MB-InSAR improves the accuracy of long time series velocity estimation by 47%, compared with traditional maximum likelihood estimation and Bayesian estimation. Moreover, MB-InSAR exhibits less sensitivity to PS density and noise. The experiment in Katy and Sienna, Houston, indicated that the MB-InSAR method increased the number of measurement points by 160% and 125%, respectively. Futhermore, the velocity obtained by the MB-InSAR method shows strong consistency with GPS observation, and the maximum difference between the MB-InSAR method and GPS is less than 2.5 mm/a. Conclusions: The MB-InSAR method is effective in improving the estimation accuracy for the DS targets, which can shed more lights in deciphering the fine-scale deformation characteristics with the complex surface environment.
  • Related Articles

    [1]XIONG Siting, WEI Ruyi, HOU Wei, DENG Zhichao, ZHANG Bochen, YAN Qin, LI Qingquan. Land Cover Classification Based on InSAR Coherence and LSTM Model[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University. DOI: 10.13203/j.whugis20240460
    [2]LI Hanxu, LI Xin, HUANG Guanwen, ZHANG Qin, CHEN Shipeng. LSTM Neural Network Assisted GNSS/SINS Vehicle Positioning Based on Speed Classification[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University. DOI: 10.13203/j.whugis20230061
    [3]TANG Shengjun, ZHANG Yunjie, LI Xiaoming, YAO Mengmeng, YE Zhihuang, LI Yaxin, GUO Renzhong, WANG Weixi. A High-Precision Indoor Point Cloud Classification Method Jointly Optimized by Super Voxel Random Forest and LSTM Neural Network[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2023, 48(4): 525-533. DOI: 10.13203/j.whugis20220125
    [4]WEI Erhu, REN Xiaobin, LIU Jingnan, LI Lianyan, WU Shuguang, NIE Guigen. Prediction of Lunar Libration Parameters Using LSTM[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2022, 47(11): 1815-1822. DOI: 10.13203/j.whugis20200318
    [5]WANG Li, XU Hao, SHU Bao, YI Chen, TIAN Yunqing. A Multi-source Heterogeneous Data Fusion Method for Landslide Monitoring with Mutual Information and IPSO-LSTM Neural Network[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2021, 46(10): 1478-1488. DOI: 10.13203/j.whugis20210131
    [6]ZHANG Zhenglu, WANG Xiaomin, DENG Yong, XIE Niansheng. Application of Fuzzy Neural Network in Deformation Analysis and Prediction[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2010, 35(1): 6-8.
    [7]ZHANG Zhenglu, WANG Hongchen, DENG Yong, XIE Niansheng. Methods for Landslide Deformation Analysis and Prediction[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2009, 34(12): 1387-1389.
    [8]DENG Xingsheng, WANG Xinzhou. Application of Dynamic Neural Network in Prediction Model[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2008, 33(1): 93-96.
    [9]WANG Xinzhou DENG Xingsheng, . Fuzzy Neural Network Modeling for Dam Deformation Prediction[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2005, 30(7): 588-591.
    [10]Deng Yuejin, Wang Baoyuan, Zhang Zhenglu. Application of Fuzzy Artifical Neural Network to the Deformation Analysis and Predication of Side Slope[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 1998, 23(1): 26-31.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(8)

    1. 贺晗,李翠杰,杨怀志,朱星盛,刘洪润,秦健. 高铁北斗基准控制网构建及优化方法. 中国铁路. 2024(04): 22-28 .
    2. 张献志,周涛,叶远斌,张紫琼,吕鹏军. 惠州市国产北斗化平台实时定位精度测试分析. 北京测绘. 2024(05): 763-767 .
    3. 刘朝晖. 铁路BDS地基增强带状空间误差建模方法. 导航定位学报. 2024(03): 112-119 .
    4. 何庆,欧阳霖,陈春花,靳文凭,张玉冰,史照清. 湖南省卫星导航定位基准站网服务体系建设及思考. 国土资源导刊. 2024(03): 1-8 .
    5. 赵毅,吴晓莉,姜英明,冯彦同. 大规模GNSS基准站网坐标解算方法研究. 南京信息工程大学学报(自然科学版). 2022(06): 694-700 .
    6. 刘洋,曾群意,郭忠臣,胡茂林,任尚勇,黎洋. 千寻位置与RTK技术在电力工程测量中的比较分析. 电力勘测设计. 2021(07): 78-82 .
    7. 谭明建,张熙,石鑫. 分布式CORS资源协同服务技术实现. 导航定位学报. 2019(02): 118-123 .
    8. 张熙,陈现春,冯威,张晶晶,包海. 附有空间误差梯度信息的虚拟基准站服务技术. 西南交通大学学报. 2019(05): 1005-1011 .

    Other cited types(8)

Catalog

    Article views (168) PDF downloads (43) Cited by(16)
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return