NIE Linjuan, QIU Yaodong, SHEN Wenbin, ZHANG Suqin, ZHANG Bingbing. Accuracy Evaluation and Applicability of IGRF12 and WMM2015 Model in Chinese Mainland[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2017, 42(9): 1229-1235, 1291. DOI: 10.13203/j.whugis20160143
Citation: NIE Linjuan, QIU Yaodong, SHEN Wenbin, ZHANG Suqin, ZHANG Bingbing. Accuracy Evaluation and Applicability of IGRF12 and WMM2015 Model in Chinese Mainland[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2017, 42(9): 1229-1235, 1291. DOI: 10.13203/j.whugis20160143

Accuracy Evaluation and Applicability of IGRF12 and WMM2015 Model in Chinese Mainland

Funds: The National Natural Science Foundation of China Nos.41274032, 41474018; the Open Research Fund Program of the State Key Laboratory of Geodesy and Earth's Dynamics No. SKLGED2017-2-2-E
More Information
  • Author Bio:

    NIE Linjuan, PhD, associate professor, specializes in geomagnetic field inversion recovery theory and geological application research. Email:ljnie@whu.edu.cn

  • Corresponding author:

    QIU Yaodong, PhD candidate, specializes in satellite geomagnetic data processing and geomagnetic navigation. E-mail:ydqiu@whu.edu.cn

  • Received Date: December 16, 2016
  • Published Date: September 04, 2017
  • In this paper, we calculate the differences of a geomagnetic field between observatories and the main magnetic field by using NGDC-720 model and observed data collected at 36 stations from 2008 to 2015 in the Chinese mainland area. The accuracy and applicability of the IGRF12 and WMM2015 models were evaluated with the RMSE. The results suggest that:the IGRF12 model is in good agreement with the annual mean value of geomagnetic observatories; but for different stations, the precision of IGRF12 model presents a huge difference. The model error in IGRF12 and WMM2015 have similar spatial distribution characteristics, and the maximum, minimum, and as root mean of magnetic elements are very close to one another. The RMSE of declination and the total magnetic field were 16'and 124.96 nT. Therefore, in studies of regional geomagnetic anomalies, regardless of the IGRF12 or WMM2015 as main magnetic field, both are feasible.
  • [1]
    徐文耀.地磁学[M].北京:地震出版社, 2003

    Xu Wenyao. Geomagnetism[M]. Beijing:Seismological Press, 2003
    [2]
    安振昌.区域和全球地磁场模型[J].地球物理学进展, 1995, 10(3):63-72 http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQWJ503.004.htm

    An Zhenchang. Regional and Global Geomagnetic Field Models[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 1995, 10(3):63-72 http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQWJ503.004.htm
    [3]
    常宜峰. 卫星磁测数据处理与地磁场模型反演理论与方法研究[D]. 郑州: 信息工程大学, 2015 http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-90005-1016058210.htm

    Chang Yieng. Research on Satellite Geomagnetic Data Process and Geomagnetic Model Recovery Theory and Method[D]. Zhengzhou:The PLA Information Engineering University, 2015 http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-90005-1016058210.htm
    [4]
    冯彦, 安振昌, 孙涵, 等.中国地区地磁正常场模型研究[J].地球科学进展, 2010, 25(7):723-729 http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXJZ201007012.htm

    Feng Yan, An Zhenchang, Sun Han, et al. A Study on Model of Geomagnetic Normal Field of China Region[J].Advances in Earth Science, 2010, 25(7):723-729 http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXJZ201007012.htm
    [5]
    高金田, 安振昌, 顾左文.地磁正常场的选取与地磁异常场的计算[J].地球物理学报, 2005, 48(1):56-62 http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQWX200501010.htm

    Gao Jintian, An Zhenchang, Gu Zuowen. Selections of theGeomagnetic Normal Field and Calculation of the Geomagnetic Anomalous Field[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2005, 48(1):56-62 http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQWX200501010.htm
    [6]
    王亶文.国际地磁参考场在中国大陆地区的误差分析[J].地球物理学报, 2003, 46(2):63-73 http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQWX200302005.htm

    Wang Danwen. Analysis of the International Geomagnetic Reference Field Error in the China Continent[J].Chinese Journal Geophysics, 2003, 46(2):171-174 http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQWX200302005.htm
    [7]
    Thébault E, Finlay C C, Alken P, et al. Evaluation of Candidate Geomagnetic Field Models for IGRF-12[J]. Earth, Planets and Space, 2010, 62(10):787-804 doi: 10.5047/eps.2010.11.005
    [8]
    高国明, 康国发.卫星地磁场模型和IGRF模型与中国地磁台观测值的比较分析[J].云南大学学报·自然科学版, 2010, 32(5):547-552 http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YNDZ201005014.htm

    Gao Guoming, Kang Guofa. The Compare Analysis of Satellite Geomagnetic Model Values and IGRF Model Values with Observed Values of Geomagnetic Observatories in China[J].Journal of Yunnan University(Natural Sciences Edition), 2010, 32(5):547-552 http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YNDZ201005014.htm
    [9]
    刘元元, 张金生, 孙渊, 等.世界地磁场模型EMM2010及其应用[J].地球物理学进展, 2012, 27(5):1939-1946 doi: 10.6038/j.issn.1004-2903.2012.05.014

    Liu Yuanyuan, Zhang Jinsheng, Sun Yuan, et al. World Magnetic Model EMM2010 and Its Application[J].Progress in Geophysics, 2012, 27(5):1939-1946 doi: 10.6038/j.issn.1004-2903.2012.05.014
    [10]
    常宜峰, 柴洪洲, 明锋, 等.世界地磁场模型WMM2010与台站年均值对比[J].武汉大学学报·信息科学版, 2014, 39(8):923-929 http://ch.whu.edu.cn/CN/abstract/abstract3045.shtml

    Chang Yifeng, Chai Hongzhou, Ming Feng, et al. Compare of WMM2010 and IGRF11 Model with Annual Mean Value of Geomagnetic Observatories[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2014, 39(8):923-928 http://ch.whu.edu.cn/CN/abstract/abstract3045.shtml
    [11]
    徐如刚, 黎哲君, 张玮晶, 等.EMM2010模型在中国大陆的精度评估及其适用性[J].吉林大学学报·地球科学版, 2014, 44(3):1018-1030 http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CCDZ201403032.htm

    Xu Rugang, Li Zhejun, Zhang Weijing, et al. Accuary and Application of EMM2010 in Chinese Mainland[J].Journal of Jilin University:Earth Science Edition, 2014, 44(3):1018-1030 http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CCDZ201403032.htm
    [12]
    张素琴, 杨冬梅, 李琪, 等.中国部分地磁台站年均值与IGRF模型一致性分析[J].地震地磁观测与研究, 2008, 29(2):42-49 http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZGJ200802008.htm

    Zhang Suqin, Yang Dongmei, Li Qi, et al. TheConsistence Analysis of IGRF Model Value and Annual Mean Value of Some Geomagnetic Observatories in China[J].Seismological and Geomagnetic Observation and Research, 2008, 29(2):42-49 http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZGJ200802008.htm
    [13]
    Brian H, Ridley V A, Beggan C D, et al. The BGSMagnetic Field Candidate Models for the 12th Generation IGRF[J]. Earth Planets and Space, 2015, 67(1):1-15 doi: 10.1186/s40623-014-0143-5
    [14]
    白春华, 徐文耀, 康国发.地球主磁场模型[J].地球物理学进展, 2008, 23(4):1045-1057 http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQWJ200804007.htm

    Bai Chunhua, Xu Wenyao, Kang Guofa. MainGeomagnetic Models[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 2008, 23(4):1045-1057 http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQWJ200804007.htm
    [15]
    陈斌, 顾左文, 高金田, 等.IGRF11描述的2005-2010年中国地区地磁长期变化及其误差分析[J].地球物理学进展, 2012, 27(2):512-521 http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQWJ201202015.htm

    Chen Bin, Gu Zuowen, Gao Jintian, et al. GeomagneticSecular Variation in China During 2005-2010 Described by IGRF-11 and Its Error Analysis[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 2012, 27(2):512-521 http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQWJ201202015.htm
    [16]
    Angelo D S, Roberta T, Luis R G P. Information Content and Kentropy of the Present Geomagnetic Field[J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 2004, 18(4):269-275 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0012821X03006812
    [17]
    Chulliat A. The US/UK World Magnetic Model for 2015-2020[R]:USA:Technical Report, National Geophysical Data Center, 2015, NOAA. doi: 10.7289/V5TB14V7
  • Related Articles

    [1]LIU Jiping, CAO Yuanhui, WANG Yong, REN Fu, DU Qingyun. Evaluating the Accessibility of Medical Services in the 15 min Life Circle Using Internet Pan-Map Resources: A Case Study in Shanghai[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2022, 47(12): 2054-2063. DOI: 10.13203/j.whugis20220565
    [2]ZHAO Zhongguo, ZHANG Feng, ZHENG Jianghua. Evaluation of Landslide Susceptibility by Multiple Adaptive Regression Spline Method[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2021, 46(3): 442-450. DOI: 10.13203/j.whugis20190136
    [3]WANG Yafei, YUAN Hui, CHEN Biyu, LI Qingquan, WAN Meng, WANG Jiayao, GUO Jianzhong. Measuring Place-Based Accessibility Under Travel Time Uncertainty[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2019, 44(11): 1723-1729. DOI: 10.13203/j.whugis20180015
    [4]LU Yonghua, LI Shuang. Spatial Accessibility of Indoor Emergency Shelters Based on Improved G2SFCA in Shenzhen City[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2019, 44(9): 1391-1398. DOI: 10.13203/j.whugis20180456
    [5]LIU Haiyan, PANG Xiaoping, WANG Yue, LI Zhongxiang. Quantitative Research for Site-selection of Antarctic Year-round Research Stations Based on Logistic Regression[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2017, 42(3): 390-394. DOI: 10.13203/j.whugis20150260
    [6]FU Zhongliang, YANG Yuanwei, GAO Xianjun, ZHAO Xingyuan, LU Yuefeng, CHEN Shaoqin. Road Networks Matching Using Multiple Logistic Regression[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2016, 41(2): 171-177. DOI: 10.13203/j.whugis20150112
    [7]Lu Jun, Dai Wujiao, Zhang Zhetao. Modeling Dam Deformation Using Varying Coefficient Regression[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2015, 40(1): 139-142.
    [8]NONG Yu, WANG Kun, DU Qingyun. Modeling Land Use Change Using Multinomial Logistic Regression[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2011, 36(6): 743-746.
    [9]FANG Zhixiang, LI Qingquan, SHAW Shihlung. Representation of Location-Specific Space-Time Accessibility Based on Time Geography Framework[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2010, 35(9): 1091-1095.
    [10]Wu Zian. The Independent Variablas-snooping in the Regression Analysis of Dam Deformation[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 1993, 18(1): 20-26.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(28)

    1. 董威威,蒋贵国,梁小雅,钟孟君,程珍旎. 基于改进引力模型的成渝地区双城经济圈城市经济联系网络演变研究. 四川师范大学学报(自然科学版). 2025(01): 82-93 .
    2. 詹庆明,李轩,樊智宇. 利用非负矩阵分解识别县域人群活动时空特征. 测绘地理信息. 2024(02): 108-113 .
    3. 李静波,关雪峰,曾星,杨昌兰,邢巍然,吴华意. 长株潭城市群建成区时空扩展特征及驱动力分析. 武汉大学学报(信息科学版). 2024(06): 1028-1039 .
    4. 何明卫,赵庆文,李健波. 组团城市通勤流网络特征及影响因素分析——以贵阳市为例. 昆明理工大学学报(自然科学版). 2024(04): 249-260 .
    5. 胡秋实,李锐,吴华意,刘朝辉,蔡晶. 顾及城市场景变化的人口分析单元表达. 武汉大学学报(信息科学版). 2024(10): 1788-1799 .
    6. 薛山,廖一兰,李春林,胡艺. 不同人口流动模式下城市传染病时空传播模型适用性研究. 地球信息科学学报. 2023(01): 208-222 .
    7. 张伟丽,郝智娟,王伊斌,魏瑞博. 城市群人口流动空间网络及影响因素. 地理科学. 2023(01): 72-81 .
    8. 张伟丽,郝智娟,王伊斌,魏瑞博. 城市群人口流动空间网络及影响因素. 地理科学. 2023(02): 72-81 .
    9. 郭联欢,洪昕晨. 城市社会感知研究与应用进展. 中外建筑. 2023(06): 12-17 .
    10. 严雪心,周婕,盛富斌,牛强. 大城市近郊区产业类型对就业人口流动的差异化影响——以武汉市为例. 经济地理. 2023(10): 63-74 .
    11. 真诗泳,林钦贤,张露丹,李嘉政,林玉英,陈诚,潘自宝,胡喜生. 基于多源数据的城市内部空间交互特征:以福州市主城区为例. 科学技术与工程. 2023(35): 14937-14946 .
    12. 赵凯旭,张帅兵,黄晓军,李恩龙,武风奇. 新冠疫情管控期间西安市人口分布演变及影响因素探测——基于多源时空大数据视角. 人口与发展. 2022(01): 140-150 .
    13. 甄峰,李哲睿,谢智敏. 基于人口流动的城市内部空间结构特征及其影响因素分析——以南京市为例. 地理研究. 2022(06): 1525-1539 .
    14. 龚丽丽,蔡忠亮,李伯钊,牛彦芬,苏世亮. 街道尺度下城市居民出行特征分析. 测绘地理信息. 2022(S1): 69-73 .
    15. 段艳慧,郭伟,赵学胜,张晓莹,张冰瑞. 基于Landsat影像和统计数据的北京市人口密度制图. 北京测绘. 2022(08): 1096-1101 .
    16. 赵虎,尚铭宇,张悦,张浩楠,李鹏乾. 区域中心城市就业空间格局及优化策略研究——以山东省青岛市为例. 山东建筑大学学报. 2022(06): 61-69 .
    17. 孙艳玲,李俊蓉,张夏坤,裴新蕊,刘子菲,郭鹏. 基于昼夜人口变化的应急避难场所可达性评价——以天津市西青区为例. 安全与环境学报. 2022(06): 3342-3349 .
    18. 张爱民. 基于大数据的江西省就业收入和社会保障研究. 科技广场. 2022(05): 71-78 .
    19. 何建华,覃荣诺,丁愫,李江,岳桥兵. 基于乡村宜居性和人口流动网络特征的农村居民点重构. 武汉大学学报(信息科学版). 2021(03): 402-409 .
    20. 罗桑扎西,甄峰,张姗琪. 复杂网络视角下的城市人流空间概念模型与研究框架. 地理研究. 2021(04): 1195-1208 .
    21. 季航宇,蔡忠亮,姜莉莉,李桂娥,李伯钊. 出租车出行的空间不平等及其与人口结构的关联. 武汉大学学报(信息科学版). 2021(05): 766-776 .
    22. 刘正廉,桂志鹏,吴华意,秦昆,吴京航,梅宇翱,赵晶. 融合建筑物与POI数据的精细人口空间化研究. 测绘地理信息. 2021(05): 102-106 .
    23. 付诗航,刘耀林,方莹,杨孝军,刘艳芳,彭明军. 基于SCD的公共交通换乘时空模式——以武汉市为例. 武汉大学学报(信息科学版). 2020(07): 1089-1098 .
    24. 甘田,刘鼎. 基于手机数据的职住空间关系研究——以重庆市主城区为例. 城市交通. 2020(05): 36-44+119 .
    25. 刘艳芳,方飞国,刘耀林,罗名海. 时空大数据在空间优化中的应用. 测绘地理信息. 2019(03): 7-20 .
    26. 杨朗,周丽娜,张晓明. 基于手机信令数据的广州市职住空间特征及其发展模式探究. 城市观察. 2019(03): 87-96 .
    27. 花磊,彭宏杰,杨秀锋,刘秀芸,袁绪英,吴宜进. 基于腾讯位置大数据的长江经济带人口流动空间分析. 华中师范大学学报(自然科学版). 2019(05): 815-820 .
    28. 宋小冬,杨钰颖,钮心毅. 上海典型产业园区职工居住地、通勤距离的变化及影响机制. 城市发展研究. 2019(12): 53-61 .

    Other cited types(17)

Catalog

    Article views (3178) PDF downloads (560) Cited by(45)
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return