-
摘要: 考虑到PSHA模型对未来地震预测特别是大震预测能起到很好的参考分析作用,尝试结合能量分布模型对其进行了改进,并以中国及周边地区200 a内的地震历史记录为基础,利用原始PSHA模型以及改进后的PSHA模型分别计算了中国及邻近地区2000~2010年间5级以上地震发生的概率,并对两种结果进行了比较分析,最终证明改进后的PSHA模型具有更好的可靠性。Abstract: Considering the importance of PSHA model in earthquakes forecasting, by using the catalog in the 200 years in China, we tried to improve the original PSHA model with combining seismic energy distribution model, and computed the probability of earthquakes in a specific area in China with time\|span T based on both the improved PSHA model and the original model. Finally the experimental results show that the improved model is more efficiency and reliable than the original one.
-
Key words:
- seismic rate estimation /
- earthquakes forecasting /
- improved PSHA model
-
[1] Frankel A. Mapping Seismic Hazard in the Central and Eastern United States[J]. Seismol Res Lett, 1995,66(4): 8\|21 [2] Cornell C A. Engineering Seismic Risk Analysis[J]. Bull Seismol Soc Am, 1968,58:1 583\|1 696 [3] 秦长源. 地震震级误差对b值的影响[J]. 地震学报,2000, 22（4）:338\|344 [4] Davis S D, Frolich C. Single\|link Cluster Analysis and Earthquake Aftershocks; Decay Laws and Regional Variations[J]. J Geophys Res, 1991,96:6 335\|6 350 [5] Felzer K R. Appendix I: Calculating California Seismicity Rates[R]. USGS Open File Report, Pasadena, California, 2007 [6] 卢怡利. 1993年至2004年嘉南地震之b值[D]. 台北:中国台湾国立中正大学,1994 [7] Lapajne J K. Spatially Smoothed Seismicity Modelling of the Seismic Hazard in Slovenia[J]. J Seismol, 1997(1): 73\|85 [8] 汤皓,陈国兴. 基于GIS和神经网络模型的场地地震液化势风险评价[J]. 武汉大学学报\5信息科学版,2007,32(8): 727\|730 [9] Fu Zhengxiang, Lu Xiaojian, Shao Huicheng, et al. Analysis on Statistical Characteristics of b\|values of Aftershock Series in China Continent and Its Subregions[J]. Earthquake, 2008,28(3): 1\|7 -
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 6565
- HTML全文浏览量: 49
- PDF下载量: 670
- 被引次数: 0
下载:
