多源地表温度估算近地表气温的精度对比

许慧慧; 高美玲; 李振洪; 胡羽丰

doi:10.13203/j.whugis20210541

多源地表温度估算近地表气温的精度对比

doi: 10.13203/j.whugis20210541

许慧慧^1,2,
高美玲^1,2,3,
李振洪^1,2,3,
胡羽丰^1,2,3

1 长安大学地质工程与测绘学院, 陕西西安, 710054
2 长安大学地学与卫星大数据研究中心, 陕西西安, 710054
3 西部矿产资源与地质工程教育部重点实验室, 陕西西安, 710054

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金（42001382,42041006，41941019）；陕西省基础科学研究计划（2021JQ-238,2020JQ-350）；长安大学中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金（300102261108，300102260301）；中欧合作龙计划5（59339）。

详细信息

作者简介:
许慧慧，硕士生，主要从事热环境相关研究，huihui.xu@chd.edu.cn

The Accuracy Comparison of Near Surface Air Temperature Estimation Using Different Land Surface Temperature Sources

XU Huihui^1,2,
GAO Meiling^1,2,3,
LI Zhenhong^1,2,3,
HU Yufeng^1,2,3

1 College of Geological Engineering and Geomatics, Chang'an University, Xi'an 710054, China
2 Big Data Center for Geosciences and Satellites, Chang'an University, Xi'an 710054, China
3 Key Laboratory of Western China's Mineral Resources and Geological Engineering, Ministry of Education, Xi'an 710054, China

Funds:

The National Natural Science Foundation of China (42001382, 42041006, 41941019)

摘要: 近地表气温（简称气温）是陆-气交互过程中重要的变量之一。气象站点稀疏而使得观测到的气温空间不连续，基于地表温度数据结合辅助变量估算气温成为获取气温空间分布的有效方式。目前，已有多种地表温度产品，但鲜有研究评估多源地表温度数据在估算气温时的精度及其适用性。针对该问题，本研究利用Google Earth Engine平台和随机森林算法，基于Landsat、MODIS、全球陆面数据同化系统（Global Land Data Assimilation System，GLDAS）三种地表温度数据源估算了黄河流域近地表气温的最大值、最小值和平均值；结合站点观测分析了多源地表温度估算气温的精度及适用性。结果表明：三种地表温度数据源估算夏季气温平均值时精度差异较小；对于气温极值估算，GLDAS显著优于MODIS和Landsat；每种数据源估算气温极值的精度低于其估算气温均值；此外，地表温度的时间分辨率会显著影响近地表气温的估算精度。本研究可以为长时序气温产品估算提供科学参考。
- GLDAS /
- MODIS /
- Landsat /
- 地表温度 /
- 近地表气温 /
- Google Earth Engine
Abstract: Objectives: Near surface air temperature (NSAT) is a key parameter in the land-atmosphere interaction process. Sparse NSAT observations from in-situ stations usually cannot fully describe the spatial distribution of NSAT, so estimating NSAT by land surface temperature (LST) and auxiliary variables has become an effective approach to obtain the spatial distribution of NSAT. Although there are some multisource LST products published, i.e., the LST from MODIS, Landsat, and Global Land Data Assimilation System (GLDAS), the applicability of each LST product in NSAT estimation still needs further investigation. Methods: Taken Yellow River Basin as the study region, summer NSAT from 2003 to 2019 was estimated based on the GEE (Google Earth Engine) platform with RF (Random Forest) algorithm in this study, and the mean, maximum and minimum NSAT was estimated in two scales (i.e., 30-m and 1000-m) using three LST data sources (Landsat, MODIS and GLDAS). The observed LST from in-situ stations over Yellow River Basin Region were compared with the estimated NSAT by the ten-cross validation method to evaluate the accuracy of different LST sources when estimating NSAT. Results: The results indicate that:1) In terms of mean NSAT, the differences of accuracy of the three LST sources are small. 2) In terms of the maximum and minimum NSAT, the GLDAS LST shows the significant higher accuracy than MODIS and Landsat LST. 3) The RMSEs of estimated mean NSAT are smaller than maximum and minimum NSAT estimation when using the same LST source. 4) For the spatial distribution of accuracy, the stations with higher error mainly located in the southern or western of the study region. Conclusions: The temporal resolution of LST source is significantly important in NSAT estimation. The GLDAS LST shows the highest accuracy in this study especially for extreme NSAT estimation. Besides, the mean NSAT estimation has higher accuracy than that of maximum or minimum NSAT for each LST source.
- GLDAS /
- MODIS /
- Landsat /
- Land Surface Temperature /
- Near Surface Air temperature /
- Google Earth Engine

[1]	de Wit A J, van Diepen C A. Crop Growth Modelling and Crop Yield Forecasting Using Satellite-Derived Meteorological Inputs[J]. International Journal of Applied Earth Observations and Geoinformation, 2007, 10(4):414-425
[2]	Izady A, Davary K, Alizadeh A, et al. Groundwater Conceptualization and Modeling Using Distributed SWAT-Based Recharge for the Semi-Arid Agricultural Neishaboor Plain, Iran[J]. Hydrogeology Journal, 2015, 23(1):47-68
[3]	Robeson S M. Relationships between Mean and Standard Deviation of Air Temperature:Implications for Global Warming[J]. Climate Research, 2002, 22(3):205-213
[4]	Lofgren B M, Hunter T S, Wilbarger J. Effects of Using Air Temperature as a Proxy for Potential Evapotranspiration in Climate Change Scenarios of Great Lakes Basin Hydrology[J]. Journal of Great Lakes Research, 2011, 37(4):744-752
[5]	Wu T T, Li Y R. Spatial Interpolation of Temperature in the United States Using Residual Kriging[J]. Applied Geography, 2013, 44:112-120
[6]	Rolland C. Spatial and Seasonal Variations of Air Temperature Lapse Rates in Alpine Regions[J], Journal of Climate, 2003, 16(7):1032-1046
[7]	Gouvas M A, Sakellariou N K, Kambezidis H D. Estimation of the Monthly and Annual Mean Maximum and Mean Minimum Air Temperature Values in Greece[J]. Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics, 2011, 110(3/4):143-149
[8]	Kattel D B, Yao T D, Panday P K. Near-Surface Air Temperature Lapse Rate in a Humid Mountainous Terrain on the Southern Slopes of the Eastern Himalayas[J]. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 2018, 132(3/4):1129-1141
[9]	Benali A, Carvalho A C, Nunes J P, et al. Estimating Air Surface Temperature in Portugal Using MODIS LST Data[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2012, 124:108-121
[10]	Xu Y M, Anders K, Shen Y, et al. Mapping Monthly Air Temperature in the Tibetan Plateau from MODIS Data Based on Machine Learning Methods[J]. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 2018, 11(2):345-354
[11]	Yang Y Z, Cai W H, Yang J. Evaluation of MODIS Land Surface Temperature Data to Estimate Near-Surface Air Temperature in Northeast China[J]. Remote Sensing, 2017, 9(5):410
[12]	Kloog I, Nordio F, Coull B A, et al. Predicting Spatiotemporal Mean Air Temperature Using MODIS Satellite Surface Temperature Measurements across the Northeastern USA[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2014, 150:132-139
[13]	Prihodko L, Goward S N, Estimation of Air Temperature from Remotely Sensed Surface Observations[J], Remote Sensing of Environment, 1997, 60(3):335-346
[14]	Zhu W B, Lü A, Jia S F. Estimation of Daily Maximum and Minimum Air Temperature Using MODIS Land Surface Temperature Products[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2013, 130:62-73
[15]	Zhang R H, Rong Y, Tian J, et al. A Remote Sensing Method for Estimating Surface Air Temperature and Surface Vapor Pressure on a Regional Scale[J]. Remote Sensing, 2015, 7(5):6005-6025
[16]	Sun Y J, Wang J F, Zhang R H, et al. Air Temperature Retrieval from Remote Sensing Data Based on Thermodynamics[J]. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 2005, 80(1):37-48
[17]	Zhang W, Huang Y, Yu Y Q, et al. Empirical Models for Estimating Daily Maximum, Minimum and Mean Air Temperatures with MODIS Land Surface Temperatures[J]. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 2011, 32(24):9415-9440
[18]	Vancutsem C, Ceccato P, Dinku T, et al. Evaluation of MODIS Land Surface Temperature Data to Estimate Air Temperature in Different Ecosystems over Africa[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2010, 114(2):449-465
[19]	Zhu S Y, Zhang G X. Progress in Near Surface Air Temperature Retrieved By Remote Sensing Technology[J]. Advances in Earth Science, 2011, 26(7):724-730
[20]	Mostovoy G V, King R L, Reddy K R, et al. Statistical Estimation of Daily Maximum and Minimum Air Temperatures from MODIS LST Data over the State of Mississippi[J]. GIScience & Remote Sensing, 2006, 43(1):78-110
[21]	Shen H F, Jiang Y, Li T W, et al. Deep Learning-Based Air Temperature Mapping by Fusing Remote Sensing, Station, Simulation and Socioeconomic Data[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2020, 240:111692
[22]	Xu Y M, Knudby A, Ho H C. Estimating Daily Maximum Air Temperature from MODIS in British Columbia, Canada[J]. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 2014, 35(24):8108-8121
[23]	Li L, Zha Y. Mapping Relative Humidity, Average and Extreme Temperature in Hot Summer over China[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 61:875-881
[24]	Gao M L, Li Z H, Tan Z Y, et al. Use of Google Earth Engine to Generate a 20-Year 1 km×1 km Monthly Air Temperature Product over Yellow River Basin[J]. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 2021, 14:10079- 10090
[25]	Ho H C, Knudby A, Sirovyak P, et al. Mapping Maximum Urban Air Temperature on Hot Summer Days[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2014, 154:38-45
[26]	Hansen M C, Potapovet P V, Moore R, et al. High-Resolution Global Maps of 21st-Century Forest Cover Change[J]. science, 2013, 342(6160):850-853
[27]	Donchyts G, Baart F, Winsemius H, et al. Earth's Surface Water Change over the Past 30 Years[J]. Nature Climate Change, 2016, 6(9):810-813
[28]	Liu X P, Huang Y H, Xu X C, et al. High-Spatiotemporal-Resolution Mapping of Global Urban Change from 1985 to 2015[J]. Nature Sustainability, 2020, 3(7):564-570
[29]	Tuckett P A, Ely J C, Sole A J, et al. Rapid Accelerations of Antarctic Peninsula Outlet Glaciers Driven by Surface Melt[J]. Nature Communications, 2019, 10:4311
[30]	Wang M M, Zhang Z J, Hu T, et al. An Efficient Framework for Producing Landsat-Based Land Surface Temperature Data Using Google Earth Engine[J]. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 2020, 13:4689-4701
[31]	Mujawdiya R, Chatterjee R, Kumar D. MODIS Land Surface Temperature Time Series Decomposition for Detecting and Characterizing Temporal Intensity Variations of Coal Fire Induced Thermal Anomalies in Jharia Coalfield, India[J]. Geocarto International,2020,15:1-5
[32]	Kilibarda M, Hengl T, Heuvelink G B, et al. Spatio-temporal Interpolation of Daily Temperatures for Global Land Areas at 1 km Resolution. Journal of Geophysical Research:Atmospheres. 2014,119(5):2294-2313

[1]	刘浩, 王广军, 谈明洪. 咸海面积萎缩对区域地表温度的影响 . 武汉大学学报 ● 信息科学版, doi: 10.13203/j.whugis20200165
[2]	王爱辉, 杨英宝, 潘鑫, 胡解君德. 顾及时空特征的FY-4A云覆盖像元地表温度重建模型 . 武汉大学学报 ● 信息科学版, doi: 10.13203/j.whugis20200039
[3]	李恒凯, 吴冠华, 王秀丽. 面向开采扰动的离子型稀土矿区地表温度降尺度方法 . 武汉大学学报 ● 信息科学版, doi: 10.13203/j.whugis20190022
[4]	卢阳, 杨建思, 黄昕, 杨其全, 马嵩. 面向局部气候带的城市形态对地表温度的影响 . 武汉大学学报 ● 信息科学版, doi: 10.13203/j.whugis20200031
[5]	叶涛焱, 李莉, 姚炎明, 夏乐章, 管卫兵. 基于Landsat影像的杭州湾最大浑浊带年际变化研究 . 武汉大学学报 ● 信息科学版, doi: 10.13203/j.whugis20170346
[6]	魏然, 单杰. 城市地表温度影像时空融合方法研究 . 武汉大学学报 ● 信息科学版, doi: 10.13203/j.whugis20150489
[7]	王斐, 覃志豪, 宋彩英. 利用Landsat TM影像进行地表温度像元分解 . 武汉大学学报 ● 信息科学版, doi: 10.13203/j.whugis20140604
[8]	胡德勇, 乔琨, 王兴玲, 赵利民, 季国华. 利用单窗算法反演Landsat 8 TIRS数据地表温度 . 武汉大学学报 ● 信息科学版, doi: 10.13203/j.whugis20150164
[9]	徐涵秋, 林中立, 潘卫华. 单通道算法地表温度反演的若干问题讨论——以Landsat系列数据为例 . 武汉大学学报 ● 信息科学版, doi: 10.13203/j.whugis20130733
[10]	田礼乔, 陈晓玲, 邱凤, 张伟. 星载激光雷达气溶胶数据辅助的近岸浑浊水体大气校正研究 . 武汉大学学报 ● 信息科学版,
[11]	杨元德, 鄂栋臣, 晁定波. 利用GRACE数据反演格陵兰冰盖冰雪质量变化 . 武汉大学学报 ● 信息科学版,
[12]	赵强, 杨世植, 乔延利, 麻金继. 利用MODIS红外资料反演大气参数以及表层温度的研究 . 武汉大学学报 ● 信息科学版,
[13]	周旋, 周晓中, 吴耀平, 翟景秋. 利用MODIS数据监测夜间雾 . 武汉大学学报 ● 信息科学版,
[14]	毛克彪, 唐华俊, 周清波, 马柱国. 实用劈窗算法的改进及大气水汽含量对精度影响评价 . 武汉大学学报 ● 信息科学版,
[15]	刘良明, 张红梅, 张丰. 近海Ⅱ类水体的MODIS影像大气校正方法 . 武汉大学学报 ● 信息科学版,
[16]	周纪, 陈云浩, 李京, 蒋卫国. 基于MODIS数据的雪面温度遥感反演 . 武汉大学学报 ● 信息科学版,
[17]	杜晓, 王世新, 周艺, 魏华. 一种新的基于MODIS的地表含水量模型构造与验证 . 武汉大学学报 ● 信息科学版,
[18]	马慧云, 李德仁, 刘良明, 梁益同. 基于MODIS卫星数据的平流雾检测研究 . 武汉大学学报 ● 信息科学版,
[19]	刘良明, 胡艳, 鄢俊洁, 谭德宝. MODIS干旱监测模型各参数权值分析 . 武汉大学学报 ● 信息科学版,
[20]	刘良明, 梁益同, 马慧云, 黄靖. MODIS和AVHRR植被指数关系的研究 . 武汉大学学报 ● 信息科学版,

点击查看大图

计量

文章访问数: 151
HTML全文浏览量: 27
PDF下载量: 18
被引次数: 0

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

留言板

多源地表温度估算近地表气温的精度对比

doi: 10.13203/j.whugis20210541

作者简介:
许慧慧，硕士生，主要从事热环境相关研究，huihui.xu@chd.edu.cn

The Accuracy Comparison of Near Surface Air Temperature Estimation Using Different Land Surface Temperature Sources

计量

多源地表温度估算近地表气温的精度对比

doi: 10.13203/j.whugis20210541

1 长安大学地质工程与测绘学院, 陕西西安, 710054

2 长安大学地学与卫星大数据研究中心, 陕西西安, 710054

3 西部矿产资源与地质工程教育部重点实验室, 陕西西安, 710054

作者简介:
许慧慧，硕士生，主要从事热环境相关研究，huihui.xu@chd.edu.cn

English Abstract

The Accuracy Comparison of Near Surface Air Temperature Estimation Using Different Land Surface Temperature Sources

全文HTML

目录

留言板

多源地表温度估算近地表气温的精度对比

doi: 10.13203/j.whugis20210541

作者简介: 许慧慧，硕士生，主要从事热环境相关研究，huihui.xu@chd.edu.cn

The Accuracy Comparison of Near Surface Air Temperature Estimation Using Different Land Surface Temperature Sources

计量

出版历程

多源地表温度估算近地表气温的精度对比

doi: 10.13203/j.whugis20210541

1 长安大学地质工程与测绘学院, 陕西 西安, 710054 2 长安大学地学与卫星大数据研究中心, 陕西 西安, 710054 3 西部矿产资源与地质工程教育部重点实验室, 陕西 西安, 710054

作者简介: 许慧慧，硕士生，主要从事热环境相关研究，huihui.xu@chd.edu.cn

English Abstract

The Accuracy Comparison of Near Surface Air Temperature Estimation Using Different Land Surface Temperature Sources

全文HTML

目录

作者简介:
许慧慧，硕士生，主要从事热环境相关研究，huihui.xu@chd.edu.cn

1 长安大学地质工程与测绘学院, 陕西西安, 710054

2 长安大学地学与卫星大数据研究中心, 陕西西安, 710054

3 西部矿产资源与地质工程教育部重点实验室, 陕西西安, 710054

作者简介:
许慧慧，硕士生，主要从事热环境相关研究，huihui.xu@chd.edu.cn