留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

BDS-3多频伪距定位性能分析

刘明亮,  安家春,  王泽民,  张保军,  宋翔宇

downloadPDF
文章导航 > 武汉大学学报 ( 信息科学版)  > 优先出版
刘明亮, 安家春, 王泽民, 张保军, 宋翔宇. BDS-3多频伪距定位性能分析[J]. 武汉大学学报 ( 信息科学版). doi: 10.13203/j.whugis20200714
引用本文: 刘明亮, 安家春, 王泽民, 张保军, 宋翔宇. BDS-3多频伪距定位性能分析[J]. 武汉大学学报 ( 信息科学版). doi: 10.13203/j.whugis20200714
shu
LIU Mingliang, AN Jiachun, WANG Zemin, ZHANG Baojun, SONG Xiangyu. Performance Analysis of BDS-3 Multi-frequency Pseudorange Positioning[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University. doi: 10.13203/j.whugis20200714
Citation: LIU Mingliang, AN Jiachun, WANG Zemin, ZHANG Baojun, SONG Xiangyu. Performance Analysis of BDS-3 Multi-frequency Pseudorange Positioning[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University. doi: 10.13203/j.whugis20200714
shu

BDS-3多频伪距定位性能分析

doi: 10.13203/j.whugis20200714

  • 1 武汉大学中国南极测绘研究中心, 武汉 430079;

  • 2 石家庄铁道大学土木工程学院, 河北 石家庄, 050043;

  • 3 道路与铁道工程安全保障省部共建教育部重点实验室(石家庄铁道大学), 河北 石家庄, 050043

基金项目: 

国家自然科学基金（41941010，41776195）；国家海洋局极地考察办公室极地科学协同创新平台项目（CXPT2020007）。

详细信息
    作者简介:

    刘明亮,博士生,主要从事高精度GNSS定位、极地冰雪监测研究。liuming_liang@163.com*

  • 中图分类号: P228

Performance Analysis of BDS-3 Multi-frequency Pseudorange Positioning

  • 1 Chinese Antarctic Center of Surveying and Mapping, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China;

  • 2 School of Civil Engineering, Shijiazhuang Tiedao University, Shijiazhuang 050043, China;

  • 3 Key Laboratory of Roads and Railway Engineering Safety Control (Shijiazhuang Tiedao University), Ministry of Education, Shijiazhuang 050043, China

Funds: 

The National Natural Science Foundation of China (41941010, 41776195)

  • 摘要: BDS-3于2020年7月31日正式开通全球服务，为详细评估BDS-3全球定位性能，以全球16个MGEX跟踪站多天实测数据为基础。采用Net_Diff软件进行了全球范围内BDS-3单频、双频无电离层组合与双频非组合模型下双频、三频非组合模型和三频无电离层两两组合模型三频伪距单点定位解算试验，并与GPS、Galileo部分频率进行对比。试验结果表明，在亚欧非地区BDS-3卫星数与空间几何构型优于GPS和Galileo，对于BDS-3单频伪距单点定位，B1C、B1I、B2a、B3I四个频率E方向精度优于0.5 m，N方向精度优于1 m，U方向精度优于2 m，与GPS和Galileo对比定位精度关系为： B1C>B1I>L1>B3I> B2a> E1>L2>E5a。对于BDS-3双频组合伪距单点定位，B2aB3I组合定位较差，不适合进行定位，B1CB2a、B1CB3I、B1IB2a、B1IB3I组合频率E方向和N方向定位精度优于1 m，U方向定位精度优于2 m，与GPS和Galileo对比定位精度关系为：B1CB2a>B1CB3I> L1L2> B1IB3I> B1IB2a> E1E5a> B2aB3I。对于BDS-3三频组合伪距单点定位，B1IB2aB3I、B1CB2aB3I组合E方向和N方向定位精度优于1 m，U方向定位精度优于2 m，与GPS和Galileo对比定位精度关系为： B1CB2aB3I> B1IB2aB3I> L1L2L2> E1E5aE5b。B1CB3I、B1IB3I、B1CB2a、B1IB2a双频组合适合利用非组合模型进行定位，B2aB3I适合利用无电离层模型进行定位，B1IB2aB3I和B1CB2aB3I适合利用非组合模型定位。结合实验结果可知，BDS-3在全球范围内定位性能较优，甚至部分频率定位性能优于GPS和Galileo，可为今后BDS-3相关研究提供一定参考。
    Abstract: Objectives: BDS-3 officially opened its global service on July 31, 2020. To evaluate the BDS-3 global positioning performance in detail. Based on multi-day measured data from 16 MGEX tracking stations around the world. Methods: Net_Diff software was used to carry out the global BDS-3 single-frequency, dual-frequency non-ionospheric combination and dual-frequency non-combination model under dual-frequency, three-frequency non-combination model and three-frequency non-ionospheric pairwise combination model, three-frequency pseudorange single Point positioning solution experiment. And compare with GPS, Galileo some frequencies. Results: The results show that the number of satellites and spatial geometry of BDS-3 in Asia, Europe and Africa are better than GPS and Galileo. For BDS-3 single-frequency pseudo-range single-point positioning, the four frequencies of B1C, B1I, B2a, and B3I have four frequencies of E direction accuracy. It is better than 0.5 m, the accuracy of the N direction is better than 1 m, and the accuracy of the U direction is better than 2 m. Compared with GPS and Galileo, the positioning accuracy relationship is:B1C>B1I>L1>B3I>B2a>E1>L2>E5a. For BDS-3 dual-frequency combined pseudorange single-point positioning, the B2aB3I combined positioning is poor and not suitable for positioning. The B1CB2a, B1CB3I, B1IB2a, B1IB3I combined frequency positioning accuracy in the E and N directions is better than 1m, and the positioning accuracy in the U direction is better 2 m, compared with GPS and Galileo, the positioning accuracy relationship is:B1CB2a> B1CB3I> L1L2> B1IB3I> B1IB2a> E1E5a> B2aB3I. For BDS-3 triple-frequency combined pseudo-range single-point positioning, the positioning accuracy of B1IB2aB3I and B1CB2aB3I in the E and N directions is better than 1 m, and the positioning accuracy in the U direction is better than 2 m. Compared with GPS and Galileo, the positioning accuracy relationship is:B1CB2aB3I> B1IB2aB3I> L1L2L2> E1E5aE5b. B1CB3I, B1IB3I, B1CB2a, B1IB2a dual-frequency combinations are suitable for positioning using non-combined models, B2aB3I is suitable for positioning using non-ionospheric models, and B1IB2aB3I and B1CB2aB3I are suitable for positioning using non-combined models. Conclusions: Combining the experimental results can draw conclusions, BDS-3 has better positioning performance on a global scale. Even some frequency positioning performance is better than GPS and Galileo, which can provide a certain reference for future BDS-3 related research.
  • [1] Shi J, Ouyang C, Huang Y, et al. Assessment of BDS-3 global positioning service:ephemeris, SPP, PPP, RTK, and new signal[J]. GPS Solutions, 2020,24(3)
    [2] Lv Y, Geng T, Zhao Q, et al. Initial assessment of BDS-3 preliminary system signal-in-space range error[J]. GPS Solutions,2020, 24(1):1-13
    [3] Hu C,Wang Q,Wang Z,et al. A New-Generation BeiDou (BDS-3) Experimental Satellite Precise Orbit Determination with an Improved Cycle-Slip Detection and Repair Algorithm[J]. Sensors 2018, 18(5):1402
    [4] Li J, Yang Y, He H, et al. Benefits of BDS-3 B1C/B1I/B2a triple-frequency signals on precise positioning and ambiguity resolution[J]. GPS Solutions, 2020, 24(4):1-10
    [5] Zhang X, Wu M, Liu W, et al. Initial assessment of the COMPASS/BeiDou-3:New-generation navigation signals[J]. Journal of geodesy, 2017, 91(10):1225-1240
    [6] Jiao G, Song S, Ge Y, et al. Assessment of BeiDou-3 and multi-GNSS precise point positioning performance[J]. Sensors, 2019, 19(11):2496
    [7] Zhang Y, Wang H, Chen J, et al. Calibration and impact of BeiDou satellite-dependent timing group delay bias[J]. Remote Sensing, 2020, 12(1):192
    [8] Dai P, Ge Y, Qin W, et al. BDS-3 time group delay and its effect on standard point positioning[J]. Remote Sensing, 2019, 11(15):1819
    [9] Jiao G, Song S, Liu Y, et al. Analysis and Assessment of BDS-2 and BDS-3 Broadcast Ephemeris:Accuracy, the Datum of Broadcast Clocks and Its Impact on Single Point Positioning[J]. Remote Sensing, 2020, 12(13):2081
    [10] Luo X, Lou Y, Gong X, et al. Benefit of sparse reference network in BDS single point positioning with single-frequency measurements[J]. The Journal of Navigation, 2018, 71(2):403-418
    [11] Mu R, Dang Y, Xu C. BDS-3/GNSS data quality and positioning performance analysis[C]//China Satellite Navigation Conference. Springer, Singapore, 2020:368-379
    [12] Guan Q, Fan C, Zheng J, et al. Multistep weighted least squares estimation method for improving single-point positioning accuracy[J]. Journal of Applied Remote Sensing, 2019, 13(3):038503
    [13] Yang Y, Xu Y, Li J, et al. Progress and performance evaluation of BeiDou global navigation satellite system:Data analysis based on BDS-3 demonstration system[J]. Sci. China Earth Sci, 2018, 61(5):614-624
    [14] Cai C, Pan L, Gao Y. A precise weighting approach with application to combined L1/B1 GPS/BeiDou positioning[J]. The Journal of Navigation, 2014, 67(5):911-925
    [15] Zhang B C, Ou J K, Yuan Y B, et al. Calibration of slant total electron content (sTEC) and Satellite-Receiver's differential code biases (DCBs) with uncombined precise point positioning (PPP) technique[J]. Acta Geodatica et Cartographica Sinica, 2011,40(4):447-453
    [16] Wang A, Chen J, Zhang Y, et al. Evaluating the impact of CNES real-time ionospheric products on multi-GNSS single-frequency positioning using the IGS real-time service[J]. Advances in Space Research, 2020, 66(11):2516-2527
    [17] Zhang Y, Chen J, Gong X, et al. The update of BDS-2 TGD and its impact on positioning[J]. Advances in Space Research, 2020, 65(11):2645-2661
    [18] Wang J J, Wang J, Sinclair D, et al. Tropospheric delay estimation for pseudolite positioning[J]. Positioning, 2005, 1(9)
    [19] Dawidowicz K. Igs08.atx to igs14.atx change dependent differences in a GNSS-derived position time series[J].Acta Geodyn. Geomater. 2018:363-378
    [20] Rebischung P, Schmid R. IGS14/igs14. atx:a new framework for the IGS products[C]//AGU Fall Meeting 2016,2016
    [21] Lemmon T R, Gerdan G P. The Influence of the Number of Satellites on the Accuracy of RTK GPS Positions[J]. Australian surveyor, 1999, 44(1):64-70
    [22] Han Y B, Ma L H, Qiao Q Y, et al. Functions of retired GEO communication satellites in improving the PDOP value of CAPS[J]. Science in China Series G:Physics, Mechanics and Astronomy, 2009, 52(3):423-433
    [23] D'EON R G, Delparte D. Effects of radio-collar position and orientation on GPS radio-collar performance, and the implications of PDOP in data screening[J]. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2005, 42(2):383-388
  • [1] 高为广, 隋叶叶, 李敏, 胡志刚, 宿辰庚, 苏牡丹.  . 武汉大学学报 ( 信息科学版), doi: 10.13203/j.whugis20220691
    [2] 曾添, 隋立芬, 贾小林, 肖国锐, 戴卿, 甘雨.  小型化LEO星座与BDS-3全星座联合定轨仿真 . 武汉大学学报 ( 信息科学版), doi: 10.13203/j.whugis20190426
    [3] 胡倬铭, 袁海军, 何秀凤, 章浙涛, 王进.  . 武汉大学学报 ( 信息科学版), doi: 10.13203/j.whugis20210454
    [4] 胡超, 王中元, 王潜心, 饶鹏文.  一种改进的BDS-2/BDS-3联合精密定轨系统偏差处理模型 . 武汉大学学报 ( 信息科学版), doi: 10.13203/j.whugis20190132
    [5] 崔浩猛, 王解先, 王明华, 王虎, 朱卫东, 侯阳飞.  利用卫星分布概率对BDS-3性能的评估 . 武汉大学学报 ( 信息科学版), doi: 10.13203/j.whugis20190172
    [6] 毛亚, 王潜心, 胡超, 杨鸿毅, 张铭彬.  BDS-3卫星钟差特性分析 . 武汉大学学报 ( 信息科学版), doi: 10.13203/j.whugis20180224
    [7] 吴明魁, 刘万科, 张小红, 田文文.  GPS/Galileo/BDS-3试验星短基线紧组合相对定位性能初步评估 . 武汉大学学报 ( 信息科学版), doi: 10.13203/j.whugis20180269
    [8] 张辉, 郝金明, 刘伟平, 周蕊, 田英国.  估计接收机差分码偏差的GPS/BDS非组合精密单点定位模型 . 武汉大学学报 ( 信息科学版), doi: 10.13203/j.whugis20170119
    [9] 赵兴旺, 刘超, 邓健, 余学祥.  一种改进的精密单点定位模型 . 武汉大学学报 ( 信息科学版), doi: 10.13203/j.whugis20160043
    [10] 张小红, 柳根, 郭斐, 李昕.  北斗三频精密单点定位模型比较及定位性能分析 . 武汉大学学报 ( 信息科学版), doi: 10.13203/j.whugis20180078
    [11] 谢建涛, 郝金明, 刘伟平, 于合理, 田英国.  一种基于多频模糊度快速解算方法的BDS/GPS中长基线RTK定位模型 . 武汉大学学报 ( 信息科学版), doi: 10.13203/j.whugis20150379
    [12] 唐卫明, 徐坤, 金蕾, 文雪中.  北斗/GPS组合伪距单点定位性能测试和分析 . 武汉大学学报 ( 信息科学版), doi: 10.13203/j.whugis20130361
    [13] 阮仁桂, 吴显兵, 冯来平.  单频精密单点定位观测模型和电离层处理方法比较 . 武汉大学学报 ( 信息科学版),
    [14] 聂建亮, 吴富梅, 何正斌, 张双成.  利用交互多模型的动态精密单点定位故障诊断算法 . 武汉大学学报 ( 信息科学版),
    [15] 于兴旺, 张小红, 聂桂根.  GPS/GALILEO多频组合差分定位研究 . 武汉大学学报 ( 信息科学版),
    [16] 张森, 唐劲松, 杨海亮, 陈鸣.  利用CSSM进行多频InSAR相位融合及DEM重构 . 武汉大学学报 ( 信息科学版),
    [17] 宋伟伟, 施闯, 姚宜斌, 叶世榕.  单频精密单点定位电离层改正方法和定位精度研究 . 武汉大学学报 ( 信息科学版),
    [18] 张小红, 李星星, 郭斐, 张明.  GPS单频精密单点定位软件实现与精度分析 . 武汉大学学报 ( 信息科学版),
    [19] 曹新运, 沈飞, 李建成, 张守建.  BDS-3/GNSS非组合精密单点定位 . 武汉大学学报 ( 信息科学版), doi: 10.13203/j.whugis20210198
    [20] 耿涛, 丁志辉, 谢新, 吕逸飞.  基于载波相位差分的多频多GNSS测速精度评估 . 武汉大学学报 ( 信息科学版), doi: 10.13203/j.whugis20200226
  • 加载中
WeChat 点击查看大图
计量
  • 文章访问数:  519
  • HTML全文浏览量:  71
  • PDF下载量:  46
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程

BDS-3多频伪距定位性能分析

doi: 10.13203/j.whugis20200714
  • 1 武汉大学中国南极测绘研究中心, 武汉 430079;
  • 2 石家庄铁道大学土木工程学院, 河北 石家庄, 050043;
  • 3 道路与铁道工程安全保障省部共建教育部重点实验室(石家庄铁道大学), 河北 石家庄, 050043
    • 基金项目:

    国家自然科学基金（41941010，41776195）；国家海洋局极地考察办公室极地科学协同创新平台项目（CXPT2020007）。

    作者简介:

    刘明亮,博士生,主要从事高精度GNSS定位、极地冰雪监测研究。liuming_liang@163.com*

  • 中图分类号: P228

摘要: BDS-3于2020年7月31日正式开通全球服务，为详细评估BDS-3全球定位性能，以全球16个MGEX跟踪站多天实测数据为基础。采用Net_Diff软件进行了全球范围内BDS-3单频、双频无电离层组合与双频非组合模型下双频、三频非组合模型和三频无电离层两两组合模型三频伪距单点定位解算试验，并与GPS、Galileo部分频率进行对比。试验结果表明，在亚欧非地区BDS-3卫星数与空间几何构型优于GPS和Galileo，对于BDS-3单频伪距单点定位，B1C、B1I、B2a、B3I四个频率E方向精度优于0.5 m，N方向精度优于1 m，U方向精度优于2 m，与GPS和Galileo对比定位精度关系为： B1C>B1I>L1>B3I> B2a> E1>L2>E5a。对于BDS-3双频组合伪距单点定位，B2aB3I组合定位较差，不适合进行定位，B1CB2a、B1CB3I、B1IB2a、B1IB3I组合频率E方向和N方向定位精度优于1 m，U方向定位精度优于2 m，与GPS和Galileo对比定位精度关系为：B1CB2a>B1CB3I> L1L2> B1IB3I> B1IB2a> E1E5a> B2aB3I。对于BDS-3三频组合伪距单点定位，B1IB2aB3I、B1CB2aB3I组合E方向和N方向定位精度优于1 m，U方向定位精度优于2 m，与GPS和Galileo对比定位精度关系为： B1CB2aB3I> B1IB2aB3I> L1L2L2> E1E5aE5b。B1CB3I、B1IB3I、B1CB2a、B1IB2a双频组合适合利用非组合模型进行定位，B2aB3I适合利用无电离层模型进行定位，B1IB2aB3I和B1CB2aB3I适合利用非组合模型定位。结合实验结果可知，BDS-3在全球范围内定位性能较优，甚至部分频率定位性能优于GPS和Galileo，可为今后BDS-3相关研究提供一定参考。

English Abstract

刘明亮, 安家春, 王泽民, 张保军, 宋翔宇. BDS-3多频伪距定位性能分析[J]. 武汉大学学报 ( 信息科学版). doi: 10.13203/j.whugis20200714
引用本文: 刘明亮, 安家春, 王泽民, 张保军, 宋翔宇. BDS-3多频伪距定位性能分析[J]. 武汉大学学报 ( 信息科学版). doi: 10.13203/j.whugis20200714
shu
LIU Mingliang, AN Jiachun, WANG Zemin, ZHANG Baojun, SONG Xiangyu. Performance Analysis of BDS-3 Multi-frequency Pseudorange Positioning[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University. doi: 10.13203/j.whugis20200714
Citation: LIU Mingliang, AN Jiachun, WANG Zemin, ZHANG Baojun, SONG Xiangyu. Performance Analysis of BDS-3 Multi-frequency Pseudorange Positioning[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University. doi: 10.13203/j.whugis20200714
shu

    全文HTML

参考文献 (23)

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回

    我要投稿

    投稿攻略

    联系我们

    二维码

    版权所有 © 2013 《武汉大学学报·信息科学版》编辑部

    地址：武汉大学文理学部本科生院楼北5楼邮政编码：430072

    电话：027-68778465,68778045E-mail:whuxxb@vip.163.com

    本系统由 北京仁和汇智信息技术有限公司 开发    百度统计