留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

生态功能区生态系统服务协同权衡对影响因子的空间非平稳性响应——以福建省为例

张紫怡,  刘艳芳,  张扬,  刘耀林,  陆砚池,  任其然

downloadPDF
文章导航 > 武汉大学学报 ● 信息科学版  > 优先出版
张紫怡, 刘艳芳, 张扬, 刘耀林, 陆砚池, 任其然. 生态功能区生态系统服务协同权衡对影响因子的空间非平稳性响应——以福建省为例[J]. 武汉大学学报 ● 信息科学版. doi: 10.13203/j.whugis20200700
引用本文: 张紫怡, 刘艳芳, 张扬, 刘耀林, 陆砚池, 任其然. 生态功能区生态系统服务协同权衡对影响因子的空间非平稳性响应——以福建省为例[J]. 武汉大学学报 ● 信息科学版. doi: 10.13203/j.whugis20200700
shu
Zhang Ziyi, Liu Yanfang, Zhang Yang, Liu Yaolin, Lu Yanchi, Ren Qiran. Spatial non-stationary response of the tradeoff/synergy between ecosystem services to influencing factors in ecological functional areas——A case study of Fujian province[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University. doi: 10.13203/j.whugis20200700
Citation: Zhang Ziyi, Liu Yanfang, Zhang Yang, Liu Yaolin, Lu Yanchi, Ren Qiran. Spatial non-stationary response of the tradeoff/synergy between ecosystem services to influencing factors in ecological functional areas——A case study of Fujian province[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University. doi: 10.13203/j.whugis20200700
shu

生态功能区生态系统服务协同权衡对影响因子的空间非平稳性响应——以福建省为例

doi: 10.13203/j.whugis20200700

  • 武汉大学资源与环境科学学院, 湖北 武汉, 430079

基金项目: 

国家重点研发计划项目（项目编号：2017YFB0503500）。

详细信息
    作者简介:

    张紫怡,博士,主要从事生态遥感应用研究。zhangziyi_violet@163.com

  • 中图分类号: P208;P273

Spatial non-stationary response of the tradeoff/synergy between ecosystem services to influencing factors in ecological functional areas——A case study of Fujian province

  • School of Resource and Environmental Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430079, China

Funds: 

The National Key Research and Development Program, China (Grant No. 2017YFB0503500).

  • 摘要: 全球生态系统服务（ecosystem services，ESs）大幅衰退，迫切需要正确的环境治理政策。为解决当前我国生态环境治理存在的两个问题：缺少以生态功能区为单位的统筹规划和缺乏对ESs协同权衡的深入理解，本研究以生态功能区为研究单元，测定四项ESs（粮食生产（grain production，GP）、植物固碳（carbonsequestration，CS）、户外休憩（outdoor recreation，OR）和生物多样性维护（biodiversity conservation，BC））的时空变化，探究ESs协同权衡的形成机制及其对温度、降水、日照、海拔和城市化程度这5项影响因子的空间非平稳性响应。本研究提出―差异比较法‖来确定ESs协同权衡的空间分布，通过主成分分析法选取影响因子，并通过地理加权逻辑回归（geographical weighted logistic regression，GWLR）确定ESs协同权衡对影响因子的空间响应。结果表明，ESs协同权衡具有显著的空间自相关性。每两项服务在空间上并非只是单一关系，而是同时存在协同与权衡关系。其中BC与OR在整个研究区内表达出高度协同关系，且其二者与其他两项服务GP、CS之间协同权衡的空间分布也十分相似。ESs协同权衡对所有影响因子均表达出显著响应，该响应具有空间异质性，其正负性和强度随空间变化。研究通过总结ESs协同权衡发生的规律，对已有的协同权衡形成机制进行细化：在一定的区域范围内，支持性土地利用类型和非支持性土地利用类型的面积比例，以及它们对各项服务的支持程度会使得两项服务在该区域范围内区分出优势服务和劣势服务。优势服务和劣势服务之间存在动态差距，当该差距处于增加状态时可能导致权衡发生。
    Abstract: Objectives: Due to the sharp decline of global ecosystem services (ESs), there is an urgent need for correct environmental governance policies. The two problems existing in the current ecological environment governance in China are needed to be solved:(i) the lack of overall planning based on the unit of ecological functional areas and (ii) the lack of in-depth understanding of the synergy and tradeoff between ESs. This study takes ecological functional areas as the research unit, to determine the Spatio-temporal changes of four ESs (grain production (GP), carbon sequestration (CS), outdoor recreation (OR), and biodiversity conservation (BC)), and to explore the formation mechanism for the synergy/tradeoff between ESs and its spatially non-stationary response to influencing factors. These factors are temperature, precipitation, sunshine, altitude, and urbanization degree. Methods: In this study, Various models and multisource data were integrated to estimate the distribution of the yield of ESs in Fujian. A "difference comparison method" is proposed to determine the spatial distribution of the synergy/tradeoff between ESs. The Moran's I was applied to determine the spatial autocorrelation of the synergy/tradeoff between ESs. The principal component analysis method is used to select influencing factors, and the geographically weighted logic regression (GWLR) is used to determine the spatial response of the synergy/tradeoff to influencing factors. Results: The main results are as follows:(1) the four ESs selected in the study (GP, CS, OR, BC) have spatial heterogeneity. Among them, the yield distribution of GP was significantly related to the administrative region, and the highest values of BC, OR, and CS appeared in the Ecological functional areas of biodiversity conservation and water conservation. (2) All the Moran's I were are greater than 0, which means the synergy/tradeoff between ESs has significant spatial autocorrelation and spatially clustered. (3) In space, there are synergy and tradeoff simultaneously between two ESs, instead of a single relationship. (4) When the spatial distribution of the yield of the two services is similar, such as BC and OR, the spatial distribution of the synergy/tradeoff between them and other services is also very similar. (5) The synergy/tradeoff between ESs showed significant responses to climate, topography, and urbanization factors. (6) The responses from the synergy/tradeoff between ESs to the influencing factors were spatially heterogeneous, and their positivity and intensity varied with space. Conclusion: The diagnosis results of the model show that the GWLR is superior to the global regression model in explaining the correlation between the synergy/tradeoffs of ESs and the influencing factors. By summarizing the law of the occurrence of the synergy/tradeoff, this paper refines the existing formation mechanism for the synergy/tradeoff between ESs:in a certain area, the area proportion of supportive land-use type and non-supporting land-use type, and the degree of their support effect for various services will make the two services distinguish between superior services and inferior services in this region. Due to the changes in land use, there is a dynamic gap between the superior services and the inferior services, which may lead to trade-offs when the gap is increasing.
  • [1] Millennium Ecosystem Assessment M. Ecosystems and human well-being[J]. Synthesis, 2005.
    [2] Feng Q, Zhao W, Fu B, et al. Ecosystem service trade-offs and their influencing factors:A case study in the Loess Plateau of China[J]. Science of The Total Environment, 2017, 607-608:1250-1263.
    [3] Bennett E M, Peterson G D, Gordon L J. Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services[J]. Ecology letters, 2009, 12(12):1394-1404.
    [4] Xu S, Liu Y, Wang X, et al. Scale effect on spatial patterns of ecosystem services and associations among them in semi-arid area:A case study in Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, China[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2017, 598:297-306.
    [5] Qiu J, Turner M G. Spatial interactions among ecosystem services in an urbanizing agricultural watershed[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2013, 110(29):12149.
    [6] Fortin M-J, Payette S. How to test the significance of the relation between spatially autocorrelated data at the landscape scale:a case study using fire and forest maps[J]. Ecoscience, 2002, 9(2):213-218.
    [7] Su S, Li D, Hu Y N, et al. Spatially non-stationary response of ecosystem service value changes to urbanization in Shanghai, China[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2014, 45:332-339.
    [8] Luo J, Kanala N K. Modeling urban growth with geographically weighted multinomial logistic regression[C]. Geoinformatics 2008 and Joint Conference on GIS and Built Environment:The Built Environment and Its Dynamics, 2008:71440M.
    [9] Rodrigues M, De La Riva J, Fotheringham S. Modeling the spatial variation of the explanatory factors of human-caused wildfires in Spain using geographically weighted logistic regression[J]. Applied Geography, 2014, 48:52-63.
    [10] Tu J, Xia Z-G. Examining spatially varying relationships between land use and water quality using geographically weighted regression I:Model design and evaluation[J]. Science of The Total Environment, 2008, 407(1):358-378.
    [11] Fotheringham A S, Brunsdon C. Local forms of spatial analysis[J]. Geographical analysis, 1999, 31(4):340-358.
    [12] Páez A, Wheeler D. Geographically weighted regression[J], 2009.
    [13] Alexandra-Maria, Klein, Ingolf, et al. Fruit Set of Highland Coffee Increases with the Diversity of Pollinating Bees[J]. Proceedings Biological Sciences, 2003.
    [14] Kuri F, Murwira A, Murwira K S, et al. Predicting maize yield in Zimbabwe using dry dekads derived from remotely sensed Vegetation Condition Index[J]. International journal of applied earth observation and geoinformation, 2014, 33:39-46.
    [15] Zhang Y, Liu Y, Zhang Y, et al. On the spatial relationship between ecosystem services and urbanization:A case study in Wuhan, China[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 637-638:780.
    [16] Baró F, Palomo I, Zulian G, et al. Mapping ecosystem service capacity, flow and demand for landscape and urban planning:A case study in the Barcelona metropolitan region[J]. Land Use Policy, 2016, 57:405-417.
    [17] Zhu W. Remote sensing estimation of net primary productivity of vegetation in terrestrial ecosystems in China and its relationship with climate change[D]. Beijing Normal University, 2005.
    [18] Peng J, Tian L, Liu Y, et al. Ecosystem services response to urbanization in metropolitan areas:Thresholds identification[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2017, 607-608:706-714.
    [19] Nelson E, Ennaanay D, Wolny S, et al. InVEST 2. 0 Beta User's Guide:Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Tradeoffs[J]. Woods Institute for the Environment, Stanford University:California, CA, USA, 2011.
    [20] Reyers B. Incorporating anthropogenic threats into evaluations of regional biodiversity and prioritisation of conservation areas in the Limpopo Province, South Africa[J]. Biological Conservation, 2004, 118(4):521-531.
    [21] Zhang Z, Liu Y, Wang Y, et al. What factors affect the synergy and tradeoff between ecosystem services, and how, from a geospatial perspective?[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 257:120454.
    [22] Jiang C, Li D, Wang D, et al. Quantification and assessment of changes in ecosystem service in the Three-River Headwaters Region, China as a result of climate variability and land cover change[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2016, 66:199-211.
    [23] Monteith J L. Climate and the efficiency of crop production in Britain[J]. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 1977, 281(980):277-294.
    [24] Potter C S, Randerson J T, Field C B, et al. Terrestrial ecosystem production:A process model based on global satellite and surface data[J]. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 1993, 7(4):811-841.
    [25] Zhu W, Pan Y, He H, et al. Simulation of maximum light use efficiency for some typical vegetation types in China[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2006, 51(4):457-463.
    [26] Moran P a P. The Interpretation of Statistical Maps[J]. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 1948, 10(2):243-251.
    [27] Augustin N, Mugglestone M A, Buckland S T. An autologistic model for the spatial distribution of wildlife[J]. Journal of Applied Ecology, 1996:339-347.
    [28] Atkinson P, E. German S, Sear D, et al. Exploring the Relations Between Riverbank Erosion and Geomorphological Controls Using Geographically Weighted Logistic Regression[M]. 35. 2003.
    [29] Morandin L A, Winston M L. Pollinators provide economic incentive to preserve natural land in agroecosystems[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2006, 116(3-4):289-292.
    [30] Ricketts T H, Regetz J, Steffan-Dewenter I, et al. Landscape effects on crop pollination services:are there general patterns?[J]. Ecology letters, 2008, 11(5):499-515.
    [31] Seto K C, Güneralp B, Hutyra L R. Global forecasts of urban expansion to 2030 and direct impacts on biodiversity and carbon pools[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2012, 109:16083-16088.
    [32] Dabral P P, Baithuri N, Pandey A. Soil Erosion Assessment in a Hilly Catchment of North Eastern India Using USLE, GIS and Remote Sensing[J]. Water Resources Management, 2008, 22(12):1783-1798.
    [33] Jia X, Fu B, Feng X, et al. The tradeoff and synergy between ecosystem services in the Grain-for-Green areas in Northern Shaanxi, China[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2014, 43:103-113.
    [34] Singer G. Productivity and Global Climate Revisited:The Sensitivity of Tropical Forest Growth to Precipitation[J]. Ecology, 2003, 84(5):1165-1170.
    [35] Porter J R, Semenov M A. Crop responses to climatic variation[J]. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B:Biological Sciences, 2005, 360(1463):2021-2035.
  • [1] 朱庆, 张曼迪, 丁雨淋, 曾浩炜, 王玮, 刘飞.  环境因子空间特征约束的区域滑坡敏感性模糊逻辑分析方法 . 武汉大学学报 ● 信息科学版, doi: 10.13203/j.whugis20200653
    [2] 朱冬雨, 陈涛, 牛瑞卿, 甄娜.  利用移动窗口遥感生态指数分析矿区生态环境 . 武汉大学学报 ● 信息科学版, doi: 10.13203/j.whugis20190122
    [3] 卢宾宾, 葛咏, 秦昆, 郑江华.  地理加权回归分析技术综述 . 武汉大学学报 ● 信息科学版, doi: 10.13203/j.whugis20190346
    [4] 聂磊, 舒红, 刘艳.  复杂地形地区月平均气温(混合)地理加权回归克里格插值 . 武汉大学学报 ● 信息科学版, doi: 10.13203/j.whugis20160433
    [5] 苟娇娇, 罗明良, 王飞.  影响黄土高原集水面积阈值的地形因子主成分分析 . 武汉大学学报 ● 信息科学版, doi: 10.13203/j.whugis20140783
    [6] 曾兴国, 牟伶俐.  月表空间环境因子动态建模驱动的探测区选取 . 武汉大学学报 ● 信息科学版, doi: 10.13203/j.whugis20140647
    [7] 吴啸龙, 杨志强, 党永超.  基于球面最小二乘配置的福建省地壳水平形变研究 . 武汉大学学报 ● 信息科学版,
    [8] 岳利群, 夏青, 柳佳佳, 陈轲.  利用偏最小二乘回归分析三维可视化系统的硬件影响因素 . 武汉大学学报 ● 信息科学版,
    [9] 刘海, 王兴玲, 陈晓玲, 陆建忠.  利用地学信息图谱的江西省生态服务价值结构研究 . 武汉大学学报 ● 信息科学版,
    [10] 陈萍, 王兴玲, 陈晓玲.  鄱阳湖生态经济区土壤侵蚀脆弱性评价 . 武汉大学学报 ● 信息科学版,
    [11] 闫浩文, 应申, 李霖.  多因子影响的地图居民地自动聚群与综合研究 . 武汉大学学报 ● 信息科学版,
    [12] 李文航, 龚建华, 周洁萍.  协同虚拟地理教学环境的设计与实现 . 武汉大学学报 ● 信息科学版,
    [13] 俞艳, 何建华, 袁艳斌.  土地生态经济适宜性评价模型研究 . 武汉大学学报 ● 信息科学版,
    [14] 庞小平, 鄂栋臣, 王自磐, 孙芳蒂.  基于GIS的南极无冰区生态环境脆弱性评价 . 武汉大学学报 ● 信息科学版,
    [15] 樊敏, 刘耀林, 吴艳娟, 杨啸滪.  基于云模型的土地整理生态影响评价研究 . 武汉大学学报 ● 信息科学版,
    [16] 文航, 龚建华, 张利辉, 周洁萍.  面向移动的协同虚拟地理研讨室 . 武汉大学学报 ● 信息科学版,
    [17] 覃文忠, 王建梅, 刘妙龙.  混合地理加权回归模型算法研究 . 武汉大学学报 ● 信息科学版,
    [18] 谢鸿宇, 刘年丰, 姚瑞珍, 宋巍巍.  生态足迹分析的资源产量法研究 . 武汉大学学报 ● 信息科学版,
    [19] 谈晓军, 边馥苓, 何忠焕.  基于OpenGIS规范的地理信息系统组件的内核及功能设计 . 武汉大学学报 ● 信息科学版,
    [20] 吴子安.  大坝变形监测数据回归分析中的因子选择 . 武汉大学学报 ● 信息科学版,
  • 加载中
WeChat 点击查看大图
计量
  • 文章访问数:  38
  • HTML全文浏览量:  3
  • PDF下载量:  5
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程

生态功能区生态系统服务协同权衡对影响因子的空间非平稳性响应——以福建省为例

doi: 10.13203/j.whugis20200700
  • 武汉大学资源与环境科学学院, 湖北 武汉, 430079
    • 基金项目:

    国家重点研发计划项目（项目编号：2017YFB0503500）。

    作者简介:

    张紫怡,博士,主要从事生态遥感应用研究。zhangziyi_violet@163.com

  • 中图分类号: P208;P273

摘要: 全球生态系统服务（ecosystem services，ESs）大幅衰退，迫切需要正确的环境治理政策。为解决当前我国生态环境治理存在的两个问题：缺少以生态功能区为单位的统筹规划和缺乏对ESs协同权衡的深入理解，本研究以生态功能区为研究单元，测定四项ESs（粮食生产（grain production，GP）、植物固碳（carbonsequestration，CS）、户外休憩（outdoor recreation，OR）和生物多样性维护（biodiversity conservation，BC））的时空变化，探究ESs协同权衡的形成机制及其对温度、降水、日照、海拔和城市化程度这5项影响因子的空间非平稳性响应。本研究提出―差异比较法‖来确定ESs协同权衡的空间分布，通过主成分分析法选取影响因子，并通过地理加权逻辑回归（geographical weighted logistic regression，GWLR）确定ESs协同权衡对影响因子的空间响应。结果表明，ESs协同权衡具有显著的空间自相关性。每两项服务在空间上并非只是单一关系，而是同时存在协同与权衡关系。其中BC与OR在整个研究区内表达出高度协同关系，且其二者与其他两项服务GP、CS之间协同权衡的空间分布也十分相似。ESs协同权衡对所有影响因子均表达出显著响应，该响应具有空间异质性，其正负性和强度随空间变化。研究通过总结ESs协同权衡发生的规律，对已有的协同权衡形成机制进行细化：在一定的区域范围内，支持性土地利用类型和非支持性土地利用类型的面积比例，以及它们对各项服务的支持程度会使得两项服务在该区域范围内区分出优势服务和劣势服务。优势服务和劣势服务之间存在动态差距，当该差距处于增加状态时可能导致权衡发生。

English Abstract

张紫怡, 刘艳芳, 张扬, 刘耀林, 陆砚池, 任其然. 生态功能区生态系统服务协同权衡对影响因子的空间非平稳性响应——以福建省为例[J]. 武汉大学学报 ● 信息科学版. doi: 10.13203/j.whugis20200700
引用本文: 张紫怡, 刘艳芳, 张扬, 刘耀林, 陆砚池, 任其然. 生态功能区生态系统服务协同权衡对影响因子的空间非平稳性响应——以福建省为例[J]. 武汉大学学报 ● 信息科学版. doi: 10.13203/j.whugis20200700
shu
Zhang Ziyi, Liu Yanfang, Zhang Yang, Liu Yaolin, Lu Yanchi, Ren Qiran. Spatial non-stationary response of the tradeoff/synergy between ecosystem services to influencing factors in ecological functional areas——A case study of Fujian province[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University. doi: 10.13203/j.whugis20200700
Citation: Zhang Ziyi, Liu Yanfang, Zhang Yang, Liu Yaolin, Lu Yanchi, Ren Qiran. Spatial non-stationary response of the tradeoff/synergy between ecosystem services to influencing factors in ecological functional areas——A case study of Fujian province[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University. doi: 10.13203/j.whugis20200700
shu

    全文HTML

参考文献 (35)

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回

    我要投稿

    投稿攻略

    联系我们

    二维码

    版权所有 © 2013 《武汉大学学报·信息科学版》编辑部

    地址：武汉大学文理学部本科生院楼北5楼邮政编码：430072

    电话：027-68778465,68778045E-mail:whuxxb@vip.163.com

    本系统由 北京仁和汇智信息技术有限公司 开发    百度统计