地图中的故事:叙事地图的阐释理论与方法框架

Stories in Maps: Theories and Methodologies for Interpreting Narrative Maps

  • 摘要: 当前,学术界关于叙事地图的探讨集中在数据组织与可视化方法等领域,鲜有关注叙事地图文本意义的研究,而意义离不开语言和阐释。针对这一局限性,本文首先在现代阐释学“互补论”的基础上,引入格式塔心理学“整体优先性”原则,提出叙事地图“意义格式塔”概念,将叙事地图意义视为不同层级的意义源和意义衍生项所构成的整体系统,并将此作为阐释目的;接着,以瓦尔堡学派图像学阐释范式为基础,创新性地引入传播视角,从本体、寓意、文化、传播场景四条路径出发,构建叙事地图的阐释方法框架;进而结合案例,详细说明了叙事地图的阐释方法,旨在为叙事地图的阐释提供理论和方法参考。

     

    Abstract: Objectives: Narrative maps have become a heated issue of modern cartography. However, former studies have predominantly focused on map design, the media function of maps, as well as data organization and visualization techniques, with rare attention on the interpretive aspects of narrative maps, which are crucial for revealing the meaning of narrative maps. Methods: Based on the complementary theory of modern hermeneutics, we introduce the principle of "integrity first" in Gestalt psychology, and propose the concept of "gestalt of meaning", which considers the meaning of narrative maps as a whole system composed of different levels of meaning sources and meaning derivatives, and take this as the purpose of interpretation. This system is in the dynamic process of continuous generation and dissemination, and there exists a contextual tension. Then, building upon the iconographic interpretation paradigm of the Warburg School, we innovatively introduce a communication perspective and construct a four-dimensional framework for narrative maps interpretation: ontology, allegory, culture, and communication scene. Results: Taking "Wuhan Red Culture Map" as a typical case, we demonstrate the interpretation process of narrative maps. This process reveals the effectiveness of our proposed framework for interpreting narrative maps. Specifically, ontological hermeneutics reveals the compositional structure and semantic principles of the formal dimension of narrative maps; allegorical hermeneutics investigates the implicit statutory meaning of narrative maps; cultural hermeneutics emphasizes the cultural concepts and social structures behind the texts of narrative maps; and the communication perspective broadens the interpretative scope of narrative maps. Conclusions: The proposed framework exhibits strong reliability in interpreting narrative maps, providing references for future research in theory and in methodology. Future research will evaluate the quality of the proposed framework with the help of questionnaires, interviews, and cognitive tests.

     

/

返回文章
返回