-
摘要: 利用IGS（International GNSS Service）中心提供的中、低纬度地区平静期、活跃期观测数据，通过Klobuchar模型与双频观测模型解算电离层总电子含量（total electron content，TEC）值。采用Holt指数平滑模型对每个历元前6 d两种模型差值进行1 d预测，利用预测所得差值对Klobuchar模型第7 d的TEC值进行改进。实验结果表明，无论在电离层活跃期还是平静期，改进模型改正效果比基本模型有显著提升，改进模型能更好地反映电离层变化特性，尤其是夜间电离层变化特性。Abstract: We use Klobuchar model and Dual-frequency observation model to calculate TEC values with the data provided by IGS center over low-latitude and mid-latitude areas in ionospheric quiet period and active period. Then improve 7th day's TEC values calculate by Klobuchar model with the difference values come from the forecast difference values in each epoch of the preceeding 6 days between Klobuchar model and Dual-frequency observation model by the Holt exponential smoothing model. The experiment results show that the correction effect of improved model has a significant improvement than the basic model no matter whether it is in in ionospheric quiet period or active period. In addition, the improved model can better reflect the ionospheric changing characteristics, especially the night ionospheric changing characteristics.
-
Keywords:
- Klobuchar /
- Holt exponential smoothing model /
- VTEC /
- ionosphere /
- time series
-
致谢: 感谢IGS中心提供的数据。
-
![]()
图 1 活跃期低纬度与中纬度3种模型对比
Figure 1. Comparison of Three Model in Ionospheric Active Period over Low-Latitude and Mid-Latitude Areas
![]()
图 2 平静期低纬度与中纬度3种模型对比
Figure 2. Comparison of Three Model in Ionospheric Quiet Period over Low-Latitude and Mid-Latitude Areas
表 1 活跃期不同时段基本模型与改进模型改正率和RMSE统计表
Table 1 Statistics of Relative Accuracy and RMSE Between Basic Model and Improved Model in Ionospheric Active Period
站名 模型 [0, 4] [4, 8] [8, 12] [12, 16] [16, 20] [20, 24] Pimo 基本 81.74%/7.18 82.34%/8.59 84.19%/7.39 64.02%/7.56 59.84%/4.83 50.55%/4.70 改进 97.52%/0.93 96.32%/1.83 90.43%/3.74 88.25%/2.46 79.55%/2.28 93.62%/0.33 Guam 基本 73.98%/12.53 77.87%/11.63 78.47%/7.80 46.96%/11.86 57.71%/4.65 78.22%/5.33 改进 98.37%/0.87 97.45%/1.36 82.87%/5.67 92.01%/2.37 94.87%/0.41 89.37%/1.94 Crao 基本 -63.50%/5.69 66.31%/2.55 42.29%/9.56 43.71%/9.02 31.37%/5.14 -83.73%/5.95 改进 87.14%/0.55 89.62%/1.14 91.19%/1.45 96.23%/0.72 91.95%/0.61 82.79%/0.57 Chan 基本 62.83%/9.24 95.43%/1.62 84.32%/2.36 92.71%/0.76 92.26%/0.81 69.56%/3.48 改进 91.80%/2.05 93.43%/1.88 91.16%/1.37 92.51%/0.74 86.97%/1.23 88.66%/1.81 
下载: 导出CSV
表 2 平静期不同时段基本模型与改进模型改正率和RMSE统计表
Table 2 Statistics of Relative Accuracy and RMSE Between Basic Model and Improved Model in Ionospheric Quiet Period
站名 模型 [0, 4] [4, 8] [8, 12] [12, 16] [16, 20] [20, 24] Pimo 基本 86.30%/2.36 72.07%/4.95 69.22%/3.97 -160.64%/4.26 21.33%/6.58 -19.97%/4.70 改进 76.90%/3.34 83.78%/2.98 83.83%/2.09 46.57%/2.92 61.54%/1.20 78.05%/1.90 Guam 基本 92.98%/1.52 94.06%/1.79 84.38%/0.95 43.99%/0.83 -37.09% /0.47 73.73%/1.29 改进 98.59%/0.55 92.02%/1.14 92.30%/1.45 89.76%/0.72 88.57%/0.62 89.28%/0.57 Crao 基本 -221.59%/6.94 -35.77%/5.64 -87.48%/9.83 0.51%/7.95 77.96%/6.61 -287.77%/7.31 改进 93.39%/0.16 92.24% /0.44 93.82%/0.38 88.59%/0.93 86.07%/0.72 84.96%/0.34 Chan 基本 77.70%/2.38 80.09%/2.51 46.95%/4.44 92.24%/0.79 23.46%/3.94 73.61%/2.94 改进 90.08%/1.03 95.45%/0.63 69.25%/2.52 90.08%/1.02 84.69%/0.96 86.19%/1.81
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] 张强, 赵齐乐, 章红平, 等.北斗卫星导航系统Klobuchar模型精度评估[J].武汉大学学报·信息科学版, 2014, 39(2):142-146 http://ch.whu.edu.cn/CN/abstract/abstract2927.shtml Zhang Qiang, Zhao Qile, Zhang Hongping, et al. Evaluation on the Precision of Klobuchar Model for BeiDou Navigation Satellite System[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2014, 39(2):142-146 http://ch.whu.edu.cn/CN/abstract/abstract2927.shtml
[2] 袁运斌. 基于GPS的电离层监测及延迟改正理论与方法的研究[D]. 武汉: 中国科学院大地测量与地球物理研究所, 2002 Yuan Yunbin. Study on Theories and Methods of Correcting Ionospheric Delay and Monitoring Ionosphere Based on GPS[D]. Wuhan: Institute of Geodesy and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2002
[3] Huo Xingliang, Yuan Yunbin, Ou Jikun, et al. Monitoring the Daytime Variations of Equatorial Ionospheric Anomaly Using IONEX Data and CHAMP GNSS Data[J]. IEEE Transactionson Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2001, 49(1):105-114
[4] 王斐, 吴晓莉, 周田, 等.不同Klobuchar模型参数的性能比较[J].测绘学报, 2014, 43(11):1151-1157 doi: 10.13485/j.cnki.11-2089.2014.0176.html Wang Fei, Wu Xiaoli, Zhou Tian, et al. Performace Comparison Between Different Klobuchar Model Parameters[J]. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica, 2014, 43(11):1151-1157 doi: 10.13485/j.cnki.11-2089.2014.0176.html
[5] 杨哲, 宋淑丽, 薛军琛, 等. Klobuchar模型和NeQuick模型在中国地区的精度评估[J].武汉大学学报·信息科学版, 2012, 37(6):704-708 http://ch.whu.edu.cn/CN/abstract/abstract240.shtml Yang Zhe, Song Shuli, Xue Junchen, et al. Accuracy Assessment of Klobuchar Model and NeQuick Model in China[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2012, 37(6):704-708 http://ch.whu.edu.cn/CN/abstract/abstract240.shtml
[6] 方涵先, 翁利斌, 杨升高. IRI、NeQuick和Klobuchar模式比较研究[J].地球物理学进展, 2012, 27(1):1-7 doi: 10.6038/j.issn.1004-2903.2012.01.001 Fang Hanxian, Weng Libin, Yang Shenggao. The Research of IRI, NeQuick and Klobuchar Models[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 2012, 27(1):1-7 doi: 10.6038/j.issn.1004-2903.2012.01.001
[7] Luo Weihua, Liu Zhizhao, Li Min, et al. A Preliminary Evaluation of the Performance of Multiple Ionospheric Models in Low-and Mid-Latitude Regions of China in 2010-2011[J]. GPS Solut, 2014, 18:297-308 doi: 10.1007/s10291-013-0330-z
[8] 章红平, 平劲松, 朱文耀, 等.电离层延迟改正模型综述[J].天文学进展, 2006, 24(1):16-26 http://www.cqvip.com/QK/96609X/200601/21393307.html Zhang Hongping, Ping Jinsong, Zhu Wenyao, et al. Brief Review of the Ionospheric Delay Models[J]. Progress in Astronomy, 2006, 24(1):16-26 http://www.cqvip.com/QK/96609X/200601/21393307.html
[9] 蔡成辉, 刘立龙, 黎峻宇, 等.基于改进的Klobuchar模型建立南宁市区域电离层延迟模型[J].大地测量与地球动力学, 2015, 35(5):797-800 http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-DKXB201505018.htm Cai Chenghui, Liu Lilong, Li Junyu, et al. Establishment of Region Ionospheric Delay Model in Nanning Based on Improved Klobuchar Model[J]. Journal of Geodesy and Geodynamics, 2015, 35(5):797-800 http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-DKXB201505018.htm
[10] Yuan Yunbin, Huo Xingliang, Ou Jikun, et al. Refining the Klobuchar Ionospheric Coefficients Based on GNSS Observtions[J]. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 2008, 44(4):1498-1510 doi: 10.1109/TAES.2008.4667725
[11] 吴越强, 吴文传, 李飞, 等.基于鲁棒Holt-Winter模型的超短期配变负荷预测方法[J].电网技术, 2014, 38(10):2810-2815 http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-DWJS201410030.htm NGO Vietcuong, Wu Wenchuan, Li Fei, et al. Ultra-Short Term Load Forecasting Using Robust Holt-Winters in Distribution Network[J]. Power System Technology, 2014, 38(10):2810-2815 http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-DWJS201410030.htm
[12] 范成方, 史建民.基于Holt-Winters及趋势ARMA组合模型的粮食种植成本预测分析-以山东玉米、小麦为例[J].中国农业资源与区划, 2014, 35(3):45-51 doi: 10.7621/cjarrp.1005-9121.20140308 Fan Chengfang, Shi Jianmin. Analysis of Gran Production Cost Forecast Based on Holt-Winters and Trend ARMA Combined Model-Taking Corn and Wheat of Shandong Province for Example[J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2014, 35(3):45-51 doi: 10.7621/cjarrp.1005-9121.20140308
[13] 吴涛, 颜辉武, 唐桂刚.三峡库区水质数据时间序列分析预测研究[J].武汉大学学报·信息科学版, 2006, 31(6):500-502 http://ch.whu.edu.cn/CN/abstract/abstract2473.shtml Wu Tao, Yan Huiwu, Tang Guigang. Prediction on Time Series Analysis of Water Quality in Yangtze Reservoir Area[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2006, 31(6):500-502 http://ch.whu.edu.cn/CN/abstract/abstract2473.shtml
[14] Klobuchar J A. Ionospheric Time Delay Algorithm for Single Frequency GNSS Users[J]. IEEE Trans. Aerospace Elec. Syst., 1987, 23(3):325-331
[15] 聂文锋, 胡伍生, 潘树国, 等.利用GPS双频数据进行区域电离层TEC提取[J].武汉大学学报·信息科学版, 2014, 39(9):1022-1027 http://ch.whu.edu.cn/CN/abstract/abstract3064.shtml Nie Wenfeng, Hu Wusheng, Pan Shuguo, et al. Exreaction of Regional Ionospheric TEC from GPS Dual Observation[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2014, 39(9):1022-1027 http://ch.whu.edu.cn/CN/abstract/abstract3064.shtml
[16] 聂兆生, 祝芙英, 付宁波. Kalman滤波在地震电离层TEC异常探测中的应用[J].大地测量与地球动力学, 2011, 31(3):47-50 https://www.wenkuxiazai.com/doc/fb44b28e8762caaedd33d4d0.html Nie Zhaosheng, Zhu Fuying, Fu Ningbo. Application of Kalman Filtering in Detecting Ionospheric TEC Anomaly Prior to Earthquake[J]. Journal of Geodesy and Geodynamics, 2011, 31(3):47-50 https://www.wenkuxiazai.com/doc/fb44b28e8762caaedd33d4d0.html
-
期刊类型引用(30)
1. 刘焱雄，陈义兰，杨龙，高珊. 基于测绘学角度探讨海岸线及其测定方法. 海洋科学进展. 2024(03): 425-436 . 
百度学术
2. 王继鹏，金云智，辛忠华，吉才宇，郭龙. 基于PSO-BP的北斗卫星导航海底高程拟合技术的研究. 天然气与石油. 2024(06): 153-160 . 百度学术
3. 付五洲，许宝华，陆彬，李涛. 重力场模型在长江口岛礁垂直基准建立中的应用. 现代测绘. 2023(04): 57-60 . 百度学术
4. 王双喜，肖强，孙雪洁. 复杂海域高精度海底地形测量关键问题研究. 海洋技术学报. 2022(01): 7-12 . 百度学术
5. 周颖，王瑞. 远海PPK测量潮位用于深度基准面计算的研究. 港工技术. 2022(02): 23-26 . 百度学术
6. 柯灝，赵建虎，周丰年，吴敬文，暴景阳，赵祥伟，谢朋朋. 联合大地水准面、海面地形和潮波运动数值模拟的长江口陆海垂直基准转换关系. 武汉大学学报(信息科学版). 2022(05): 731-737+746 . 百度学术
7. 单瑞，李浩军，刘慧敏，赵钊，董凌宇，杜凯. GNSS PPP/INS紧组合模式下的远海无验潮水深测量. 海洋地质前沿. 2022(10): 87-93 . 百度学术
8. 张颖，闫玉茹，章家保，李静，裘露露. 潮滩冲淤观测技术发展现状. 海洋科学. 2021(03): 152-162 . 百度学术
9. 王森，刘立龙，黄良珂，周威. 基于潮汐调和分析的全球定位系统-多路径反射测量技术潮位预报. 科学技术与工程. 2021(09): 3481-3486 . 百度学术
10. 魏荣灏，陈佳兵，徐达. 基于PPK无验潮的水下地形测量技术研究. 海洋技术学报. 2021(01): 57-62 . 百度学术
11. 王挺，王萃. GNSS-PPK在远距离潮位观测的应用研究. 江西测绘. 2021(04): 8-11 . 百度学术
12. 王正杰，王峰，吴自银，曹振轶，罗孝文，李守军. 基于GPS PPK技术确定测深点瞬时潮位及分析. 海洋技术学报. 2020(02): 58-63 . 百度学术
13. 王小刚，赵薛强，许军. 珠江口瞬时水位解算方法研究及应用. 水利水电技术. 2020(11): 117-124 . 百度学术
14. 梁冠辉，陶常飞，周兴华，周东旭，王朝阳. 新型远距离验潮系统集成设计与研制. 海洋科学进展. 2019(01): 129-139 . 百度学术
15. 王智明，孙月文. 无验潮模式下的宁波杭州湾水下地形测量. 城市勘测. 2019(02): 157-159 . 百度学术
16. 陈正伟，韩磊. 基于高精度GNSS定位解算及姿态数据获取潮位研究. 海洋技术学报. 2019(05): 55-59 . 百度学术
17. 李梦昊，王胜利，高兴国，陈冠旭，刘焱雄. 基于混合编程的实时精密单点定位方法. 海岸工程. 2018(01): 66-73 . 百度学术
18. 黄辰虎，陆秀平，边刚，黄贤源，管明雷，翟国君，黄谟涛. 中短期验潮站验潮零点不规则漂移精密处理. 武汉大学学报(信息科学版). 2018(11): 1673-1680 . 百度学术
19. Yuanxi YANG，Tianhe XU，Shuqiang XUE. Progresses and Prospects of Marine Geodetic Datum and Marine Navigation in China. Journal of Geodesy and Geoinformation Science. 2018(01): 16-24 . 必应学术
20. 臧建飞，范士杰，易昌华，秦学彬，华亮，麻德明. 实时精密单点定位的远海实时GPS潮汐观测. 测绘科学. 2017(06): 155-160 . 百度学术
21. 臧建飞，范士杰，易昌华，秦学彬，陈冠旭，华亮. 远海实时GPS潮汐的实时精密单点定位观测. 测绘科学. 2017(08): 79-84 . 百度学术
22. 杨元喜，徐天河，薛树强. 我国海洋大地测量基准与海洋导航技术研究进展与展望. 测绘学报. 2017(01): 1-8 . 百度学术
23. 赵建虎，欧阳永忠，王爱学. 海底地形测量技术现状及发展趋势. 测绘学报. 2017(10): 1786-1794 . 百度学术
24. 王朝阳，周兴华，李延刚，梁冠辉，付延光. 远距离GNSS潮位测量精度的影响因素研究. 海洋技术学报. 2017(03): 1-6 . 百度学术
25. 辛保稳，李友龙. GPS PPK技术在海底地形测量中的应用. 科技展望. 2017(18): 161 . 百度学术
26. 杨涛，葛俊洁，李路. GPS测量技术及其在工程测量中的应用. 电子测试. 2016(06): 126+125 . 百度学术
27. 暴景阳，翟国君，许军. 海洋垂直基准及转换的技术途径分析. 武汉大学学报(信息科学版). 2016(01): 52-57 . 百度学术
28. 周东旭，周兴华，梁冠辉，王朝阳，杨磊. GPS浮标天线高的动态标定方法. 测绘科学. 2015(12): 121-124 . 百度学术
29. 赵建虎，王爱学. 精密海洋测量与数据处理技术及其应用进展. 海洋测绘. 2015(06): 1-7 . 百度学术
30. 赵元元，殷行. 土地测量中GPS实时动态技术的应用研究. 价值工程. 2015(20): 161-162 . 百度学术
其他类型引用(6)
计量
- 文章访问数:
- HTML全文浏览量:
- PDF下载量:
- 被引次数: 36
