湿延迟与可降水量转换系数的全球经验模型

姚宜斌; 郭健健; 张豹; 胡羽丰

doi:10.13203/j.whugis20140585

湿延迟与可降水量转换系数的全球经验模型

武汉大学测绘学院, 湖北武汉, 430079

基金项目: 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(2014214020202);国家测绘地理信息局测绘基础研究基金(13-02-09)。

详细信息

作者简介:
姚宜斌,教授,博士生导师,主要从事测量数据处理基础理论与方法研究。ybyao@sgg.whu.edu.cn

中图分类号: P237.9;P228.42
计量
- 文章访问数: 1676
- HTML全文浏览量: 70
- PDF下载量: 518
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2014-07-27
- 发布日期: 2016-01-04

A Global Empirical Model of the Conversion Factor Between Zenith Wet Delay and Precipitable Water Vapor

School of Geodesy and Geomatics, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China

Funds: The Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities,No.2014214020202; Surveying and Mapping Basic Research Program of National Administration of Surveying, Mapping and Geoinformation, No.13-02-09.

摘要

摘要: 利用2005~2011年的全球大地测量观测系统(global geodetic observing system,GGOS)Atmosphere提供的2.5°×2°(经度×纬度)的天顶湿延迟(zenith wet delay,ZWD)格网数据和欧洲中尺度天气预报中心(European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts,ECMWF)提供的2.5°×2°可降水量(precipitable water vapor,PWV)格网数据,在全球范围内计算得到各格网点的地基GPS水汽反演关键参数Π^-1的时间序列,分析了其时空分布特征,建立了一种转换系数Π的全球经验模型。该模型无需站点气象数据,仅与站点经纬度、年积日和海拔相关。利用未参与建模的2012年的GGOS Atmosphere和ECMWF格网数据、2012年661个无线电探空站的探空资料对模型进行精度检验。结果显示,采用格网数据检验,其偏差的平均值(Bias)为-0.179 mm,均方根误差(root mean square error,RMS)的平均值为1.806 mm;采用无线电探空资料进行检验,其Bias为0.465 mm, RMS为0.789 mm。结果都表现出了较小的系统性偏差与较高的精度,说明所建立的湿延迟与可降水量转换系数模型在全球范围内具有较高的精度与稳定性。
- 天顶湿延迟 /
- 可降水量 /
- 转换系数 /
- 全球经验模型 /
- 无线电探空资料
Abstract: We calculated the key parameters of ground-based GPS water vapor inversion in each grid point and got the time series of the conversion factor Π^-1by using the global zenith wet delay (ZWD) grid data with a spatial resolution of 2.5°×2°(longitude × latitude) provided by global geodetic observing system (GGOS) Atmosphere and precipitable water vapor (PWV) products with a same spatial resolution provided by European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) from 2005 to 2011, followed by the analysis of temporal and spatial characteristic. We establish a global empirical model of Π which is related to the site's latitude, longitude, altitude and the day of year (doy) without meteorological data. Then we used the GGOS Atmosphere and ECMWF grid data that not involved in modeling in 2012, 661 radiosonde stations' data in 2012 to test accuracy of the model. The results show that the mean deviation (Bias) is -0.179 mm and root mean square error (Root Mean Square Error, RMS) is 1.806 mm from the grid data; the Bias is 0.465 mm, RMS is 0.789 mm from radiosonde data. Both of them indicate the accuracy and stability of the model is high with a small systematic bias on a global scale.
- zenith wet delay /
- precipitable water vapor /
- conversion factor /
- global empirical model /
- radiosonde data

HTML全文

参考文献(14)

[1]	Askne J, Nordius H. Estimation of Tropospheric Delay for Microwaves from Surface Weather Data[J]. Radio Science, 1987, 22(3):379-386
[2]	Wang Y, Liu Y, Liu L, et al. Retrieval of the Change of Precipitable Water Vapor by GPS Technique[J]. Geo-spatial Information Science, 2007, 10(4):265-268
[3]	Bevis M, Businger S, Herring T A, et al. GPS Meteorology:Remote Sensing of Atmospheric Water Vapor Using the Global Positioning System[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research:Atmospheres, 1992, 97(D14):15 787-15 801
[4]	Yao Y B, Zhu S, Yue S Q. A Globally Applicable, Season-Specific Model for Estimating the Weighted Mean Temperature of the Atmosphere[J]. Journal of Geodesy(1984-2012), 2012, 86(12):1 125-1 135
[5]	Emardson T R, Elgered g, Johansson J M. Three Months of Continuous Monitoring of Atmospheric Water Vapor With a Network of Global Positioning System Receivers[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research:Atmospheres(1984-2012), 1998, 103(D2):1 807-1 820
[6]	Emardson T R, Derks H J P. On The Relation Between the Wet Delay and the Integrated Precipitable Water Vapour in the European Atmosphere[J]. Meteorological Applications, 2000, 7(1):61-68
[7]	Jade S, Vijayan M S M. GPS-Based Atmospheric Precipitable Water Vapor Estimation Using Meteorological Parameters Interpolated from NCEP Global Reanalysis Data[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research:Atmospheres (1984-2012), 2008, 113(D3),DOI: 10.1029/2007JD008758
[8]	Dee D P, Uppala S M, Simmons A J, et al. The ERA-Interim Reanalysis:Configuration and Performance of the Data Assimilation System[J]. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 2011, 137:553-597
[9]	Uppala S M, Kullberg P W, Simmons A J, et al. The ERA Re-analysis[J]. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 2005, 131:2 961-3 012
[10]	Song Jing, Li Hui, Huo Chuanxiu. The Forecast Precision Verification of ECMWF Products over the Mid-latitude Zone of East Asia[J]. Meteorology Journal of Henan, 2004(3):14-15(宋婧, 李辉, 霍传秀. ECMWF产品在东亚中纬度地区预报精度检验[J]. 河南气象, 2004(3):14-15)
[11]	Chen Qinming, Song Shuli, Zhu Wenyao. An Analysis of the Accuracy of Zenith Tropospheric Delay Calculated from ECMWF/NCEP Data over Asian Area[J]. Chinese Journal Geophysics, 2012,55(5):1 541-1 548(陈钦明, 宋淑丽, 朱文耀. 亚洲地区 ECMWF/NCEP 资料计算 ZTD 的精度分析[J]. 地球物理学报, 2012, 55(5):1 541-1 548)
[12]	Böehm J, Heinkelmann R, Schuh H. Short Note:a Global Model of Pressure and Temperature for Geodetic Applications[J]. Journal of Geodesy, 2007, 81(10):679-683
[13]	Davis J L, Herring T A, Shapiro I I, et al. Geodesy by Radio Interferometry:Effects of Atmospheric Modeling Errors on Estimates of Baseline Length[J]. Radio Science, 1985, 20(6):1 593-1 607
[14]	Braun J, Rocken C, Ware R. Validation of Line-of-Sight Water Vapor Measurements with GPS[J]. Radio Science, 2001, 36(3):459-472

施引文献

资源附件(0)

计量

文章访问数: 1676
HTML全文浏览量: 70
PDF下载量: 518
被引次数: 0

湿延迟与可降水量转换系数的全球经验模型

作者简介: 姚宜斌,教授,博士生导师,主要从事测量数据处理基础理论与方法研究。ybyao@sgg.whu.edu.cn

计量

出版历程

A Global Empirical Model of the Conversion Factor Between Zenith Wet Delay and Precipitable Water Vapor

计量

出版历程

目录

作者简介:
姚宜斌,教授,博士生导师,主要从事测量数据处理基础理论与方法研究。ybyao@sgg.whu.edu.cn