Quality Analysis of the Range Measurement Signals of Test Satellites in BeiDou Global System
-
摘要: 目前,北斗全球卫星导航系统有5颗试验卫星发射试验信号。试验卫星数据质量分析是北斗全球系统信号体制验证的重要内容。基于单测站北斗试验卫星观测数据,采用伪距相位差组合和伪距多径组合方法,初步分析了试验卫星民用信号以及Bs频点信号伪距测量噪声和多径误差。结果表明,倾斜同步轨道卫星伪距测量精度优于中轨道卫星;在各导航信号中,B2a+b信号伪距测量精度最高,具有最优的抗多径性能;B1C信号伪距测量精度最低,抗多径性能最差;Bs信号伪距测量精度较差,但优于B1C信号,且其伪距多径存在一个与高度角相关的系统误差,在高度角最大时可达0.5 m。Abstract: Currently, there are five testing satellites of BeiDou Global Satellite Navigation System broadcasting new signals. Quality analysis of testing satellite observations is a significant content for the verification of the new signal system. Based on single station measurement of BeiDou testing satellites, the code minus phase combination (CC) and multipath combination (MP) are employed to analyze the code noise and multipath errors of civil signals and Bs signal of the test satellites. The result shows that the pseudorange measurement accuracy of inclined geosynchronous satellite orbit (IGSO) satellite is better than that of the medium earth orbit (MEO) satellite; B2a+b signal has the highest pseudorange measurement accuracy as well as the best anti-multipath performance, while the B1C signal performs the worst in both aspects; the pseudorange measurement accuracy of Bs signal is rela-tively poor, yet better than that of the B1C signal and a systematic error related to elevation exists in the code multipath series of Bs signal with its maximum value up to 0.5 meter.
-
Keywords:
- BeiDou Global Satellite Navigation System /
- test satellites /
- IGSO /
- MEO /
- pseudorange noise /
- multipath error
-
-
表 1 本文所分析试验卫星信号
Table 1 Signals of Test Satellites Analyzed in This Contribution
卫星 卫星类型 信号 I1-S IGSO B1I、B3I I2-S IGSO B1I、B1C、B2a、B2b、B2a+b、B3I、Bs M1-S MEO B1I、B1C、B2a、B2b、B2a+b、B3I、Bs M2-S MEO B1I、B1C、B2a、B2b、B2a+b、B3I 表 2 各试验卫星伪距噪声RMS/ m
Table 2 RMS of Code Noise of Test Satellites/ m
卫星 B1 B2 B3 Bs B1I B1C B2a B2b B2a+b B3I B3C I1-S 0.10 0.06 I2-S 0.10 0.18 0.11 0.06 0.03 0.05 0.12 M1-S 0.23 0.28 0.20 0.19 0.07 0.20 0.26 M2-S 0.23 0.29 0.22 0.19 0.07 0.21 -
[1] 杨元喜.北斗卫星导航系统的进展、贡献与挑战[J].测绘学报, 2010, 39(1):1-6 http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CHXB201001003.htm Yang Yuanxi. Progress, Contribution and Challenges of Compass/BeiDou Satellites Navigation System[J]. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica, 2010, 39(1):1-6 http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CHXB201001003.htm
[2] 杨元喜, 李金龙, 徐君毅, 等.中国北斗卫星系统对全球PNT用户的贡献[J].科学通报, 2011, 56(21):1734-1740 http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-KXTB201121009.htm Yang Yuanxi, Li Jinlong, Xu Junyi, et al. Contribution of the COMPASS Satellite Navigation System to Global PNT Users[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2011, 56(21):1734-1740 http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-KXTB201121009.htm
[3] Yang Yuanxi, Li Jinlong, Wang Aibing, et al. Preliminary Assessment of the Navigation and Positioning Performance of BeiDou Regional Navigation Satellite System[J]. Science China Earth Sciences, 2014, 57(1):144-152 doi: 10.1007/s11430-013-4769-0
[4] Guo Shuren. Directions 2016:A New Stage for the Development of BeiDou[J]. GPS World, 2016, 7(10):56-62
[5] Xiao Wei, Liu Wenxiang, Sun Guangfu. Modernization Milestone:BeiDou M2-S Initial Signal Analysis[J]. GPS Solutions, 2015, 3(1):42-49
[6] Gao G, Chen A, Lo S, et al. Compass-M1 Broadcast Codes in E2, E5b, and E6 Frequency Bands[J]. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, 2009, 3(4):599-612 doi: 10.1109/JSTSP.2009.2025635
[7] 程鹏飞, 李玮, 秘金钟.北斗导航卫星系统测距信号的精度分析[J].测绘学报, 2012, 41(5):690-695, 780 http://www.cqvip.com/QK/98178A/201501/663814077.html Cheng Pengfei, Li Wei, Bei Jinzhong. Precision Analysis of BeiDou Measurement Signals[J]. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica, 2012, 41(5):690-695, 780 http://www.cqvip.com/QK/98178A/201501/663814077.html
[8] 张小红, 丁乐乐.北斗二代观测值质量分析及随机模型精化[J].武汉大学学报·信息科学版, 2013, 38(7):832-836 http://ch.whu.edu.cn/CN/Y2013/V38/I7/832 Zhang Xiaohong, Ding Lele. Quality Analysis of the Second Generation Compass Observables and Stochastic Model Refining[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2013, 38(7):832-836 http://ch.whu.edu.cn/CN/Y2013/V38/I7/832
[9] Cameron A. New BeiDou TMBOC Signal Tracked Similar to Future GPS L1C Structure[J]. GPS World, 2015, 26(10):1-5
[10] de Bakker P F, van der Marel H, Tiberius C C J M. Geometry-Free Undifferenced, Single and Double Differenced Analysis of Single Frequency GPS, EGNOS, and GIOVE-A/B Measurements[J]. GPS Solutions, 2009, 13(4):305-314 doi: 10.1007/s10291-009-0123-6
[11] Tiberius C C J M, de Bakker P F, van der Marel H, et al. Geometry-Free Analysis of GIOVE-A/B E1-E5a, and GPS L1-L5 Measurements[C]. ION GNSS, Savannah, GA, 2009
[12] de Bakker P F, Tiberius C C J M, van der Marel H, et al. Short and Zero Baseline Analysis of GPS L1 C/A, L5Q, GIOVE E1B, and E5aQ Signals[J]. GPS Solutions, 2012, 16(1):1-5 doi: 10.1007/s10291-010-0201-9
[13] Alfanek O, Skone S, Lachapelle G. Evaluation of L2C Observations and Limitations[C]. ION GNSS 20th International Technical Meeting of the Satellites Division, Fort Worth, 2007
[14] Hauschild A, Montenbruck O, Sleewaegen J M, et al. Characterization of Compass M-1 Signals[J]. GPS Solutions, 2012, 16(1):117-126 doi: 10.1007/s10291-011-0210-3
[15] Zhang Xiaohong, He Xiyang, Liu Wanke. Characteristics of Systematic Errors in the BDS Hatch-Melbourne-Wübbena Combination and Its Influence on Wide-Lane Ambiguity Resolution[J]. GPS Solutions, 2016, 20(1):1-13 doi: 10.1007/s10291-014-0428-y
[16] Simsky A, de Wilde W, Willems T, et al. First Field Experience with L5 Signals: DME Interfe-rence Reality Check[C]. 22nd International Meeting of the Satellite Division, Savannah, 2009
[17] 杨再秀, 黄智刚, 耿生群.基于副载波跟踪的BOC信号跟踪环路设计[J].北京航空航天大学学报, 2013, 37(2):245-248 http://www.cqvip.com/QK/90750X/201102/37228015.html Yang Zaixiu, Huang Zhigang, Geng Shengqun. Novel Tracking Loop of BOC Signal Based on Subcarrier Tracking[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2013, 37(2):245-248 http://www.cqvip.com/QK/90750X/201102/37228015.html
[18] Wanninger L, Beer S. BeiDou Satellite-Induced Code Pseudorange Variations:Diagnosis and Therapy[J]. GPS Solution, 2015, 19(4):639-648 doi: 10.1007/s10291-014-0423-3