地球重力位模型确定局部大地水准面起伏的比较研究

林淼, 朱建军, 杨经豪, 邱斌

林淼, 朱建军, 杨经豪, 邱斌. 地球重力位模型确定局部大地水准面起伏的比较研究[J]. 武汉大学学报 ( 信息科学版), 2009, 34(10): 1194-1198.
引用本文: 林淼, 朱建军, 杨经豪, 邱斌. 地球重力位模型确定局部大地水准面起伏的比较研究[J]. 武汉大学学报 ( 信息科学版), 2009, 34(10): 1194-1198.
LIN Miao, ZHU Jianjun, YANG Jinghao, QIU Bin. Comparison of the Regional Geoid Undulations Determinated by Geopotential Models[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2009, 34(10): 1194-1198.
Citation: LIN Miao, ZHU Jianjun, YANG Jinghao, QIU Bin. Comparison of the Regional Geoid Undulations Determinated by Geopotential Models[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2009, 34(10): 1194-1198.

地球重力位模型确定局部大地水准面起伏的比较研究

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金资助项目(40874005,40574003)
详细信息
    作者简介:

    林淼,硕士生。主要从事物理大地测量方面的研究。

  • 中图分类号: :P223.0

Comparison of the Regional Geoid Undulations Determinated by Geopotential Models

Funds: 国家自然科学基金资助项目(40874005,40574003)
  • 摘要: 分析了EGM2008、EGM96、GGM02等几种地球重力位模型的阶方差,为得到各模型中长波分量和短波分量的精度,利用研究区域内GPS水准数据分别对所选模型120阶和360阶计算得到的大地水准面高进行了比较,又考虑到地形和实测重力数据缺失对大地水准面的影响,把研究区域划分为平原和山地丘陵两部分,并比较了两个地区内参考点上模型计算值的精度,利用最小二乘原理对模型计算值进行了拟合改正。
    Abstract: The analysis of the degree variances of the geopotential models(EGM2008、EGM96、 GGM02 et al)were presented.In order to generating the accuracies of the long-medium and short medium components of the models,the geoid undulations computed by the models up to degree 120 and 360 were evaluated combing with the GPS leveling data in the research area.Considering the effect of the topography on the geoid and the deficiency of the observed gravity data,the research area was divided into the flat part and the mountainous part roughly,and then the model values on the reference points were compared in each part.Finally a least square fitting was used to correct and modify the model values.The results were showed as follows,EGM2008 was the most accurate model with respect to the potential coefficients.In the fist 120 degree the accuracy of the values from the model EGM2008 was quite identical with those from GGM02C_EGM96,as well as EGM2008 was the best in the degree of 360.The standard deviation in the mountainous areas was larger than that in the flat areas obviously and EGM2008 was also the best model in two topographic conditions.Compared to the model values the fitting values were improved,but the accuracy was not as good as that in flat part.
计量
  • 文章访问数:  1094
  • HTML全文浏览量:  44
  • PDF下载量:  544
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2009-08-14
  • 修回日期:  2009-08-14
  • 发布日期:  2009-10-04

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回