三维地籍支撑土地混合利用的立体治理框架

A 3D Cadastre-Supported Spatial Governance Framework for Mixed Land Use

  • 摘要: 针对传统二维地籍难以支撑城市土地混合利用中权属叠合与空间分层的现实困境,探索三维地籍支撑土地混合利用及其立体治理的路径与机制。采用理论分析与案例阐释,构建由复合功能协同治理、立体空间产权表达和三维 RRR(Rights,Restrictions, and Responsibilities)配置组成的立体治理框架。结果表明:(1)三维地籍可为兼容性、容量、外部性等要求的识别、表达和核验提供依据;(2)通过三维空间单元、界面关系与连通网络,形成边界清晰、关系明确、可核验的产权对象;(3)形成由权利配置、公共限制与治理责任构成的 RRR 配置体系,使治理要求落实到具体空间和主体。三维地籍不仅承担立体权属表达的技术功能,更为复杂立体空间资源的精细化治理提供了空间信息基础和产权表达基础,能够有效支撑平面土地管理向立体空间治理的转变。

     

    Abstract: Objectives: Urban land development is shifting from horizontal expansion toward integrated use of above-ground, ground-level, and underground spaces. This transformation has produced mixed-use projects in which functions, property rights, shared interfaces, circulation systems, and governance responsibilities overlap in three-dimensional space. Conventional two-dimensional cadastres mainly describe parcel boundaries and land-use attributes in plan view, making it difficult to represent vertical stratification, cross-layer connections, public restrictions, and differentiated responsibilities. This study aims to construct a three-dimensional cadastre-supported spatial governance framework for mixed land use and to clarify how 3D cadastre can evolve from a tool for spatial representation and registration into a foundation for refined governance. Methods: The study combines theoretical analysis with case-based interpretation. Governance requirements are decomposed into compatibility, capacity, and externalities. A spatial property-right representation framework is then constructed through 3D spatial units, interface relations, and connectivity networks. On this basis, a configuration system of rights, restrictions, and responsibilities (RRR) is developed to associate spatial objects with right holders, public constraints, and governance duties. Cases of rail-transit overbuild development, vertically differentiated land supply, and underground transport hubs are used to explain the framework. Results: The framework consists of three dimensions. At the functional level, 3D cadastre provides a spatial basis for identifying and verifying compatibility, capacity, and externalities. Compatibility is assessed through the extents, interfaces, shared areas, and connections of different uses. Capacity control is linked to spatial units, corridors, vertical transport facilities, and transfer nodes, while professional assessment results are attached to identifiable spatial objects. Externalities such as noise, vibration, lighting, traffic impacts, and pedestrian spillover are related to impact sources, transmission paths, and affected objects. At the spatial level, 3D spatial units define horizontal and vertical extents; interface relations describe adjacency, support, attachment, separation, and shared use; and connectivity networks organize corridors, entrances, transfer nodes, and emergency routes into a traceable topological structure. The Suzhou East Railway Station case illustrates the conversion of vertically differentiated functions into 3D land-supply units, while the Gangxia North Transport Hub case demonstrates the representation of shared interfaces and multi-level circulation relationships. At the institutional level, the 3D RRR system links rights allocation, public restrictions, and governance responsibilities to specific property objects. At the institutional level, the 3D RRR system links rights allocation, public restrictions, and governance responsibilities to specific property objects. Rights can be associated with explicit 3D extents, while public-access requirements, facility-protection conditions, maintenance duties, and operational responsibilities can be recorded through registration notes, planning conditions, contracts, or management rules. These objects can be associated with right holders, right types, uses, public-access requirements, facility-protection conditions, maintenance duties, and operational responsibilities. Conclusions: The framework integrates functional governance, spatial property-right representation, and RRR configuration within a unified cadastral logic. Its contribution lies not only in adding vertical geometry, but also in organizing functions, spatial relationships, public constraints, and responsibilities around common 3D objects. This supports consistent links among planning control, construction verification, cadastral survey, property registration, and operational management. Future research should address quantitative governance evaluation, lifecycle data-conversion standards, and legal procedures for 3D registration and spatial representation of easements.

     

/

返回文章
返回