呼包鄂榆城市群草地脆弱性时空演变及因子可解释性分析

Spatiotemporal Evolution and Explainable Analysis of Grassland Vulnerability in the Hohhot-Baotou-Ordos-Yulin Urban Agglomeration

  • 摘要: 干旱半干旱资源型城市群处于生态脆弱区与资源开发密集区的叠合地带,草地生态系统承担着防风固沙、水土保持和区域生态安全支撑等功能。识别草地生态系统脆弱性并利用可解释机器学习分析各评价因子的重要性及其响应特征,有助于理解区域生态过程、优化生态修复布局和支撑资源型城市群绿色转型。基于2001—2025年中国年度土地覆盖数据集和净初级生产力数据,识别呼包鄂榆城市群草地覆盖演变轨迹,量化草地生态系统的敏感性、适应性和脆弱性,并结合表格基础模型TabPFN(tabular prior-data fitted network)和SHAP(Shapley additive explanation)方法分析各评价因子的贡献、非线性响应及交互特征。结果表明:(1)研究区草地覆盖总体稳定,草地稳定区占67.70%,草地增加区主要分布于毛乌素沙地及周边生态修复区,流失和草地波动区多见于城市边界、矿区及耕地周边;草地多年平均净初级生产力(net primary productivity,NPP)呈东部及南部高、西部及西北部较低的格局,年均值为174.188 gC·m-2·a-1。(2)草地NPP整体呈增加趋势,Sen-MK分析显示,显著增加区占90.43%,Sen-Hurst分析显示,未来持续增加区占94.10%,表明草地生产力提升趋势明显且具有较强延续性。(3)草地生态系统脆弱性空间异质性显著,重度脆弱占比最高,为21.15%,主要分布于鄂尔多斯高原、毛乌素沙地边缘及局部矿区。(4)TabPFN模型表现最优,五折交叉验证R2平均值为0.827 5。SHAP分析表明,归一化植被指数(normalized difference vegetation index,NDVI)均值、降水均值和NDVI标准差是草地脆弱性的重要评价因子,且各因子在不同草地演变轨迹下的重要性存在差异。非线性阈值与交互作用分析进一步表明,植被状态、水分、热环境和地形因子与草地脆弱性的空间分异密切相关。建立了保护-修复-巩固-管控相结合的草地演变分区治理方案,可为干旱半干旱资源型城市群草地脆弱性识别与生态修复优化提供参考。

     

    Abstract: Objectives: Arid and semi-arid resource-based urban agglomerations are located in areas where ecologically vulnerable regions overlap with intensive resource development. Identification of grassland ecosystem vulnerability and application of explainable machine learning to analyze the importance and response characteristics of assessment factors can support regional ecological understanding, restoration planning, and green transition. Methods: Grassland cover trajectories in the Hohhot-Baotou-Ordos-Yulin urban agglomeration were identified using the China land cover dataset and net primary productivity (NPP) data from 2001 to 2025. Sensitivity, adaptability, and vulnerability were quantified, and a tabular prior-data fitted network (TabPFN) with Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) was used to analyze the contributions, nonlinear responses, and interactions of climate, socioeconomic, surface ecological, and topographic factors. Results: Grassland cover was generally stable, with stable grassland accounting for 67.70%. Gained grassland was concentrated in the Mu Us Sandy Land and the surrounding restoration areas, whereas lost and fluctuating grassland occurred mainly near urban margins, mining areas, and cropland edges. Mean annual NPP was higher in the east and south and lower in the west and northwest, with a regional mean value of 174.188 gC·m-2·a-1. Sen-MK and Sen-Hurst analysis showed that the significant and persistent NPP increases accounted for 90.43% and 94.10%, respectively. Vulnerability showed that the marked spatial heterogeneity, and severe vulnerability had the largest share of 21.15%, mainly in the Ordos Plateau, margins of the Mu Us Sandy Land, and local mining areas. TabPFN performed the best, with a mean five-fold cross-validation R2 of 0.827 5. Mean normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), mean precipitation, and NDVI standard deviation were important assessment factors, and their importance differed among grassland trajectories. Conclusions: Nonlinear threshold and interaction analysis indicated that vegetation state, water availability, thermal conditions, and topography were closely associated with the spatial differentiation of grassland vulnerability. A zonal governance scheme integrating protection, restoration, consolidation, and regulation was developed to support vulnerability identification and ecological restoration in arid and semi-arid resource-based urban agglomerations.

     

/

返回文章
返回