面向公众地震应急决策服务的知识—工具协同智能体构建方法

A Knowledge-Tool Collaborative Agent Construction Method for Public-Oriented Earthquake Emergency Decision Services

  • 摘要: 震后普通公众的避险与疏散决策具有突发性强、时间窗短及空间数据依赖性高等特征。现有科普式知识服务难以提供贴合个体位置与环境约束的可执行支持,而仅依赖大语言模型的对话生成又缺乏空间计算能力并存在幻觉风险。为此,本文提出一种面向公众的地震应急信息服务智能体框架,探索从自然语言需求到空间化行动建议的受控生成与工具化落地路径。方法上,首先基于权威指南与预案语料构建情景模板与基本应急措施条目,并通过向量化检索建立情景—措施语义映射,为建议生成提供可追溯的知识约束;其次,面向公众典型空间分析需求,将风险识别、设施检索与疏散路径规划等GIS操作抽象为可调用工具,设计统一工具描述符与注册机制以形成可扩展工具空间;在此基础上,构建“意图解析—情景匹配—措施推荐—工具链规划—顺序执行—响应生成”的端到端工作流,形成知识检索、工具调用与结果组织的协同,并实现原型系统,用于阶段性产物展示与实验复现。实验示例与受控任务评测结果表明,在受控环境下,系统在意图识别、措施制定、工具调用与执行方面表现较为稳定,综合疏散任务的端到端链路表现最好;同时,部分任务中仍存在执行结果向最终响应反馈组织不足的问题。总体上,本文初步说明了知识约束与工具执行协同路线在公众地震应急决策支持中的可行性。未来将进一步接入真实业务数据,构建结果感知的响应组织机制,并建立可靠性评估与用户测试体系。

     

    Abstract: Objectives: Post-earthquake protective action and evacuation decisions for the general public are characterized by high urgency, short decision windows, and strong dependence on geospatial context. Existing science-popularization-oriented knowledge services often fail to provide actionable support tailored to an individual’s location and environmental constraints, while dialogue generation based solely on large language models (LLMs) lacks spatial computing capability and may suffer from hallucinations. To address this problem, this study proposes a public-oriented earthquake emergency information service agent framework and explores a controlled, tool-grounded pathway from natural-language needs to spatialized action recommendations. Methods: First, scenario templates and atomic emergency response measures were constructed from authoritative guidelines and emergency plan corpora. A scenario–measure semantic mapping was then established through vector-based retrieval to provide traceable knowledge constraints for recommendation generation. Second, targeting typical public geospatial analysis needs, GIS operations such as risk identification, facility retrieval, and evacuation route planning were abstracted into callable tools. A unified tool descriptor schema and registry mechanism were further designed to form an extensible tool space. On this basis, an end-to-end workflow was developed, including intent parsing, scenario matching, measure recommendation, toolchain planning, sequential execution, and response generation, thereby enabling coordinated knowledge retrieval, tool invocation, and result organization. A prototype system was also implemented to support the presentation of intermediate outputs and experiment reproduction. Results: The experimental evaluation included both a representative case demonstration and controlled multi-task assessment. The former was used to illustrate the full end-to-end process from user request interpretation to spatial result generation, while the latter involved 12 test samples covering four representative task types, namely risk identification, shelter lookup, full-chain evacuation, and family rendezvous. The controlled evaluation results indicate that, under the current experimental setting, the system performs relatively stably in intent recognition, task-template matching, and key tool execution, with the best overall performance observed in the full-chain evacuation task. At the same time, some tasks still reveal insufficient feedback organization from execution results to final response generation. Conclusions: Overall, this study preliminarily demonstrates the feasibility of a knowledge-constrained and tool-grounded collaborative route for public earthquake emergency decision support. The proposed framework provides an implementable pathway for transforming natural-language requests into spatial analysis results and response outputs under controlled conditions. Future work will focus on integrating real operational data, developing result-aware response organization mechanisms, and establishing reliability evaluation and user testing schemes.

     

/

返回文章
返回