流域单元与SHAP可解释方法耦合的泥石流风险动态评估及驱动因素分析研究

Analysis of Spatiotemporal Evolution and Driving Factors of Debris Flow Risk by Coupling Watershed Units with the SHAP Method

  • 摘要: 泥石流是山区典型的突发性地质灾害,科学刻画其风险的动态特征及驱动机制对防灾减灾具有重要意义。针对泥石流风险演化机理认识不足的问题,本文提出了一种耦合流域单元与SHAP(Shapley Additive Explanations)可解释性分析的泥石流动态风险评估方法,并成功应用于甘肃省宕昌县。首先,构建泥石流灾害编目,划分流域单元,对调控因子进行筛选与预处理;其次,分别采用随机森林(Random Forest,RF)、逻辑回归(Logistic Regression,LR)、支持向量机(Support Vector Machine,SVM)和极端梯度提升(Extreme Gradient Boosting,XGBoost)四种模型,对宕昌县2005年、2010年、2015年和2020年四个时期泥石流风险进行定量评估,并分析其风险格局的变化特征;最后,引入SHAP方法定量刻画各驱动因素的边际贡献与交互效应,揭示泥石流风险动态变化的内在机制。结果表明:(1) RF模型预测性能最优,其受试者工作特征曲线下的面积值(Area Under Curve,AUC)值超0.94,显著优于其他模型;(2)宕昌县泥石流风险空间格局呈现(高风险扩张、极低风险收缩”的两极加速集聚趋势,其中极高风险区面积占比由2005年的23.84%增至2020年的26.31%,而极低风险区面积占比则由35.45%下降至33.21%; (3)泥石流风险驱动机制表现出显著的阶段性演化特征: 2010年受道路建设、经济发展等人为扰动因素主导,2015年自然因子的基础性作用重新增强,至2020年逐渐形成自然与人文因素协同作用的相对平衡格局。本研究深化了对山区泥石流灾害风险演变规律的认识,阐明了其驱动机制的阶段性转变过程,可为山区地质灾害风险动态评估与精准防控提供方法支撑。

     

    Abstract: Objectives: Debris flows are typical rapid-onset geohazards in mountainous regions, and a scientific characterization of their spatiotemporal risk dynamics and driving mechanisms is of great importance for disaster prevention and mitigation. However, the evolution mechanisms of debris-flow risk remain insufficiently understood. This study aims to develop a dynamic debris-flow risk assessment framework that integrates watershed-based units with interpretable machine-learning analysis to elucidate the spatiotemporal evolution and driving forces of debrisflow risk. Methods: A dynamic debris-flow risk assessment method coupling watershed units and SHAP (Shapley Additive Explanations) interpretability analysis is proposed and applied to Tanchang County, Gansu Province, China. First, a debris-flow inventory was constructed, watershed units were delineated, and potential conditioning factors were screened and preprocessed. Subsequently, four models—Random Forest (RF), Logistic Regression (LR), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost)—were employed to quantitatively evaluate debris-flow risks for four periods (2005, 2010, 2015, and 2020), and the corresponding spatiotemporal evolution patterns were analyzed. Finally, the SHAP method was introduced to quantitatively evaluate the marginal contributions and interaction effects of driving factors, thereby revealing the intrinsic mechanisms governing the spatiotemporal differentiation and dynamic evolution of debris-flow risk. Results: RF model achieved the best predictive performance, with an Area Under the Curve (AUC) value exceeding 0.94, significantly outperforming the other models. The spatial pattern of debris-flow risk in Tanchang County exhibited an accelerated bipolar aggregation trend characterized by the expansion of high-risk areas and the contraction of extremely low-risk areas, with the proportion of extremely high-risk zones increasing from 23.84% in 2005 to 26.31% in 2020, while that of extremely low-risk zones decreased from 35.45% to 33.21%. The driving mechanisms of debris-flow risk displayed pronounced stage-dependent characteristics, with anthropogenic disturbances (e.g., road construction and economic development) dominating in 2010, a re‑enhanced fundamental role of natural factors in 2015, and a relatively balanced synergistic effect of natural and human factors emerging by 2020. Conclusions: This study advances the understanding of the spatiotemporal evolution of debris-flow risk in mountainous regions and clarifies the stagedependent transitions of its driving mechanisms. The proposed framework provides robust methodological support for dynamic risk assessment and targeted prevention and mitigation of debris-flow hazards in mountainous areas.

     

/

返回文章
返回