基于我国VGOS网的UT1加强观测与评估

UT1 intensive measurements and evaluation based on China's VGOS Network

  • 摘要: VLBI是唯一能高精度测定UT1参数的技术,VLBI的每日UT1加强观测解决了因其高时变性引起的长期预报精度差的问题。VGOS系统,凭借其超宽带信号接收技术和快速旋转天线革新,相较传统S/X双频VLBI,成为UT1加强观测的优选方案。我国佘山、南山和天马13米VGOS天线系统相继建成并投入使用,随即开展了面向国内的自主UT1加强观测服务。我们针对2022年5月至2024年5月的国内VGOS网的加强观测进行了分析处理。结果显示,ΔUT1(即UT1与UTC之差)的分析结果与IERS C04 20序列标准相比,偏差均值仅为12.3µs,RMS(均方根)误差为44.0µs,中值形式误差为14.3µs,这不仅是基于我国VGOS系统的首次实现的高精度ΔUT1解算结果,而且该结果已经成功应用于我国的地球自转参数服务体系。我们还分析了先验模型误差对UT1加强观测数据解算的影响,包括站坐标误差、极移和天极偏移误差对我国VGOS网解算ΔUT1的影响。单位毫角秒的极移误差可导致约20µs的ΔUT1误差。尽管我国基线相比于国际网较短,但ΔUT1精度与国际传统UT1加强观测网的相当,为我国实现自主高精度EOP测定奠定了坚实基石。

     

    Abstract: Objectives: The VGOS system, leveraging ultra-wide band signal reception and innovative rapidly rotating antenna technology, has emerged as the preferred choice for UT1 intensive observations, surpassing legacy S/X dual-frequency VLBI. China's 13-meter VGOS stations at Sheshan, Nanshan, and Tianma have successively been established, promptly initiating independent UT1 intensive observation services for domestic needs. Our objective was to analyze the precision of the first batch of intensive UT1 observations collected by China's VGOS network, compare it with the precision of international data and evaluate China's autonomous Earth Orientation Parameters (EOP) monitoring capabilities and contributions to international joint observations.
    Methods: In the ΔUT1 calculation, we estimated ΔUT1, clock offsets as quadratic functions relative to the reference station, and zenith wet delays for each station, while adopting optimal model parameters for the remaining parameters. Additionally, we evaluated the impact of errors in the prior parameters of the model on ΔUT1 through theoretical derivation and adjustments to the prior model parameters. This included specific impacts from station coordinate errors, polar motion errors, celestial pole offsets and so on.
    Results: We analyzed and processed UT1 intensive observations from May 2022 to May 2024 based on China’s VGOS network. The results demonstrate that China's ΔUT1(UT1-UTC) analysis outcomes, when compared to the IERS C04 20 sequence standards, exhibit a mean deviation as low as 12.3 µs, with an RMS error at 44.0 µs and a median formal error of just 14.3 µs. All of the priori model errors including the station coordinates, polar motion and nutation errors have certain impacts on the ΔUT1 calculation results. Specifically, a polar motion error of up to 1 mas can lead to a ΔUT1 error of 20 µs.
    Conclusions: Our results are not only the first high-precision intensive resolution of ΔUT1 based on China's VGOS system, but also have already been successfully integrated into China's UT1 prediction service system. Despite China's relatively short baselines compared to the international networks, their precision is comparable to that of international traditional UT1 intensive observations, laying a solid foundation for China's independent achievement of high-precision EOP determination.

     

/

返回文章
返回