郭际明, 章迪, 史俊波, 周命端. 利用射线追踪法分析三种典型对流层映射函数在中国区域的精度[J]. 武汉大学学报 ( 信息科学版), 2015, 40(2): 182-187.
引用本文: 郭际明, 章迪, 史俊波, 周命端. 利用射线追踪法分析三种典型对流层映射函数在中国区域的精度[J]. 武汉大学学报 ( 信息科学版), 2015, 40(2): 182-187.
shu
Guo Jiming, Zhang Di, Shi Junbo, Zhou Mingduan. Using Ray-Tracing to Analyse the Precision of Three Classical Tropospheric Mapping Functions in China[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2015, 40(2): 182-187.
Citation: Guo Jiming, Zhang Di, Shi Junbo, Zhou Mingduan. Using Ray-Tracing to Analyse the Precision of Three Classical Tropospheric Mapping Functions in China[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2015, 40(2): 182-187.
shu

利用射线追踪法分析三种典型对流层映射函数在中国区域的精度

Using Ray-Tracing to Analyse the Precision of Three Classical Tropospheric Mapping Functions in China

    摘要
  • 摘要: 基于中国区域内8个气象站点2012年全年的探空数据,采用射线追踪法计算了各个站天顶方向至4°高度角区间内18个方向的对流层流体静力学和非流体静力学延迟量,将天顶延迟通过NMF、GMF和VMF1三种映射函数投影到各个高度角方向,与射线追踪法得出的延迟量进行比较,结果显示:①NMF有明显的季节性偏差,且精度与纬度存在强相关性;②VMF1的精度最高、稳定性最好,但在武汉、长沙等站点存在一定的季节性偏差;③GMF的精度介于NMF和VMF1之间。

     

    Abstract: Radiosonde data from 8 stations in China are analyzed based on ray-tracing technology. Hydrostatic and non-hydrostatic delays for 18 directions，from the zenith to 40 elevation，were computed.The results were compared with 3 mapping functions: NMF, UMF and VMFl，which demonstrate that: ①there is strong relation between the precision of NMF and the latitude of the station;②VMFl is the most precise and stable mapping function, but with certain seasonal variations when applied in WuHan，ChangSha and some other stations;③the precision of UMF falls between that of NMF and VMFl.

     

    • HTML全文
    • 参考文献(0)
    • 相关文章
    • 施引文献
  • 资源附件(0)

/

返回文章
返回