刘振江, 韩炳权, 能懿菡, 李振洪, 余琛, 宋闯, 陈博, 赵利江, 张雪松, 彭建兵. InSAR观测约束下的2023年甘肃积石山地震震源参数及其滑动分布[J]. 武汉大学学报 ( 信息科学版). DOI: 10.13203/j.whugis20240008
引用本文: 刘振江, 韩炳权, 能懿菡, 李振洪, 余琛, 宋闯, 陈博, 赵利江, 张雪松, 彭建兵. InSAR观测约束下的2023年甘肃积石山地震震源参数及其滑动分布[J]. 武汉大学学报 ( 信息科学版). DOI: 10.13203/j.whugis20240008
LIU Zhenjiang, HAN Bingquan, NAI Yihan, LI Zhenhong, YU Chen, SONG Chuang, CHEN Bo, ZHAO Lijiang, ZHANG Xuesong, PENG Jianbing. Source Parameters and Slip Distribution of the 2023 Mw 6.0 Jishishan (Gansu, China) Earthquake Constrained by InSAR Observations[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University. DOI: 10.13203/j.whugis20240008
Citation: LIU Zhenjiang, HAN Bingquan, NAI Yihan, LI Zhenhong, YU Chen, SONG Chuang, CHEN Bo, ZHAO Lijiang, ZHANG Xuesong, PENG Jianbing. Source Parameters and Slip Distribution of the 2023 Mw 6.0 Jishishan (Gansu, China) Earthquake Constrained by InSAR Observations[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University. DOI: 10.13203/j.whugis20240008

InSAR观测约束下的2023年甘肃积石山地震震源参数及其滑动分布

Source Parameters and Slip Distribution of the 2023 Mw 6.0 Jishishan (Gansu, China) Earthquake Constrained by InSAR Observations

  • 摘要: 2023年12月18日,甘肃临夏州积石山县发生了Mw 6.0地震,本次地震是青藏高原东北缘拉脊山断裂带上有现代地震记录以来发生的最大地震。快速获取2023年积石山地震的发震断层几何和精细滑动分布对于评估拉脊山断裂带周边区域未来地震危险性具有重要意义。本研究利用Sentinel-1A卫星雷达观测获取了2023年积石山地震的升降轨同震地表形变场,并以此为约束反演了该事件的发震断层几何和精细滑动分布,最后,结合库伦失稳准则分析了区域地震危险性。InSAR形变结果表明本次地震的升降轨同震形变场均以抬升形变为主,升轨最大LOS向位移~6.5 cm,降轨最大LOS向位移~7.2 cm;同震断层建模测试表明使用东倾断层几何和西倾断层几何均能较好地解释该次地震引起的地表形变。根据余震以及同震滑坡分布分析结果,我们更倾向于认为本次地震发生在一条NNW走向的东倾逆冲盲断层;静态库伦应力变化计算结果表明,2023年积石山地震的发生增加了拉脊山南缘断裂、拉脊山北缘断裂的NWW走向分段及其NNW走向的震中以南分段、西秦岭北缘断裂以及倒淌河-临夏断裂的震中以东分段的未来地震风险。

     

    Abstract: Objectives: On 18 December 2023, an Mw 6.0 earthquake struck Jishishan county (Gansu, China). It is the largest earthquake ever recorded in the Lajishan fault zone at the northeastern margin of the Tibetan Plateau since modern seismicity has been recorded and is of great importance to determine seismogenic fault geometry and refined slip distribution for assessing future seismic hazards in the Lajishan fault zone region. Methods: We used Sentinel-1A synthetic aperture radar (SAR) images to acquire coseismic surface deformation and used them as a constraint to invert the fault geometry and refined slip distribution. Finally, we analysed the regional seismic risk based on the static Coulomb failure stress change (ΔCFS). Results: The InSAR results show that the coseismic displacements were dominated by uplift deformation for both ascending and descending tracks, with the maximum line-of-sight (LOS) uplift deformation ~6.5 cm for ascending track, and the maximum LOS uplift deformation ~7.2 cm for descending track. Source modeling results show that the coseismic surface displacements of this event can be explained well using either east- or west-dipping fault geometries. Conclusions: Based on aftershock and coseismic landslide distributions, we prefer to the east-dipping fault model as the seismogenic fault of the event, i.e. this earthquake occurred on a NNW-trending, east-dipping, blind thrut fault. Stress loading in the region indicates that future attention should be paid in (1) the entire section of the South Laji Mountain fault,( 2) the NWW-trending segments of the North Laji Mountain fault and its NNW-trending segments south of the epicentre, and (3) the segments east of the epicentre of the northern margin of western Qinling fault and Daotanghe-Linxia fault.

     

/

返回文章
返回