张迪, 袁林果, 黄良珂, 李秦政. 澳大利亚区域大气加权平均温度建模[J]. 武汉大学学报 ( 信息科学版), 2022, 47(7): 1146-1153. DOI: 10.13203/j.whugis20200102
引用本文: 张迪, 袁林果, 黄良珂, 李秦政. 澳大利亚区域大气加权平均温度建模[J]. 武汉大学学报 ( 信息科学版), 2022, 47(7): 1146-1153. DOI: 10.13203/j.whugis20200102
ZHANG Di, YUAN Linguo, HUANG Liangke, LI Qinzheng. Atmospheric Weighted Mean Temperature Modeling for Australia[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2022, 47(7): 1146-1153. DOI: 10.13203/j.whugis20200102
Citation: ZHANG Di, YUAN Linguo, HUANG Liangke, LI Qinzheng. Atmospheric Weighted Mean Temperature Modeling for Australia[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2022, 47(7): 1146-1153. DOI: 10.13203/j.whugis20200102

澳大利亚区域大气加权平均温度建模

Atmospheric Weighted Mean Temperature Modeling for Australia

  • 摘要: 大气加权平均温度Tm是计算水汽转换因子和大气可降水量的重要参数。利用2007—2017年全球大地观测系统(global geodetic observing system, GGOS) Atmosphere Tm格网数据和欧洲中尺度天气预报中心(European centre for medium-range weather forecasts, ECMWF) 2 m温度数据,建立一种适合澳大利亚区域、顾及Tm残差季节性和日周期变化的Tm模型——qTm。此外,采用2018年的GGOS Atmosphere Tm格网数据和探空资料对该模型进行评估。结果表明,qTm模型在澳大利亚区域具有较高的精度和适用性,与GGOS Atmosphere Tm相比,qTm模型的年均偏差(Bias)和均方根误差(root mean square error, RMSE)分别为-0.31 K和1.97 K,相对于GPT2w-1和GPT2w-5模型,RMSE分别提高21.8%和25.9%;qTm模型值与探空积分值更符合,模型的年均Bias和RMSE分别为-0.44 K和2.45 K,相比GPT2w-1和GPT2w-5模型分别提高10.2% 和11.8%。qTm模型可为澳大利亚区域提供精确的Tm值,为该区域大气水汽分析和厄尔尼诺现象研究提供基础。

     

    Abstract:
      Objectives  Atmospheric weighted average temperature Tm is essential for calculating water vapour conversion factor and atmospheric precipitation.
      Methods  Based on the global geodetic observing system(GGOS) Atmosphere Tm grid data and European centre for medium-range weather forecasts (ECMWF) 2 m temperature data from 2007 to 2017, a Tm model (qTm) suitable for Australia was established and the seasonal and daily variation of Tm residuals was taken into account. In addition, GGOS Atmosphere Tm grid data and radiosonde data in 2018 were selected to evaluate the model.
      Results  The results reveal that the qTm model is more accurate and applicable in the Australian region. Compared with GGOS Atmosphere Tm, the annual average Bias and RMSE(root mean square error) of the qTm model are -0.31 K and 1.97 K, respectively. While compared to the GPT2w(global pressure and temperature 2 wet)-1 and GPT2w-5, RMSE of qTm model increased by 21.8% and 25.9%, respectively. qTm model values are more consistent with sounding integral values, and the model's annual average Bias and RMSE are -0.44 K and 2.45 K, respectively. Compared with GPT2w-1 and GPT2w-5, they increased by 10.2% and 11.8%, respectively.
      Conclusions  The qTm model can provide accurate Tm values for the Australian region and is a basis for the region's atmospheric moisture analysis and El Niño studies.

     

/

返回文章
返回