张熙, 刘长建, 章繁, 吴庆, 胡小华. 四大GNSS广播星历精度评估与对比分析[J]. 武汉大学学报 ( 信息科学版), 2022, 47(2): 208-218. DOI: 10.13203/j.whugis20190473
引用本文: 张熙, 刘长建, 章繁, 吴庆, 胡小华. 四大GNSS广播星历精度评估与对比分析[J]. 武汉大学学报 ( 信息科学版), 2022, 47(2): 208-218. DOI: 10.13203/j.whugis20190473
ZHANG Xi, LIU Changjian, ZHANG Fan, WU Qing, HU Xiaohua. Accuracy Evaluation and Comparative Analysis of Four Major GNSS Broadcast Ephemeris[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2022, 47(2): 208-218. DOI: 10.13203/j.whugis20190473
Citation: ZHANG Xi, LIU Changjian, ZHANG Fan, WU Qing, HU Xiaohua. Accuracy Evaluation and Comparative Analysis of Four Major GNSS Broadcast Ephemeris[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2022, 47(2): 208-218. DOI: 10.13203/j.whugis20190473

四大GNSS广播星历精度评估与对比分析

Accuracy Evaluation and Comparative Analysis of Four Major GNSS Broadcast Ephemeris

  • 摘要: 分析了目前广播星历精度评估中存在的问题,详细论述了广播星历精度评估过程中对精密星历进行天线相位中心改正的取值方法,提出了利用单颗星单日钟差均值作二次差对广播星历钟差的系统性偏差进行改正的方法。选取2019-09-01-2019-11-01共计62天的多模GNSS实验(multi-GNSS experiment,MGEX)混合广播星历和精密星历,对全球定位系统(global positioning system,GPS)、格洛纳斯(global navigation satellite system,GLONASS)、伽利略卫星导航系统(Galileo navigation satellite system,Galileo)、北斗卫星导航系统(BeiDou navigation satellite system,BDS)进行多方面精度评估。结果表明,精度评估所选用的天线相位中心改正值以及消除广播星历钟差系统性偏差的方法均准确有效;从星座整体的轨道误差、钟差、空间信号测距差的均方根来看,4个系统广播星历精度由高到低依次为Galileo、GPS、BDS、GLONASS,随着各导航系统的完善,各系统广播星历精度必将进一步提高。

     

    Abstract:
      Objectives  The major global navigation satellite system (GNSS) includes global positioning system (GPS), global navigation satellite system (GLONASS), Galileo navigation satellite system (Galileo), and BeiDou navigation satellite system (BDS). The accuracy of broadcast ephemeris of the four major GNSS should be evaluated, and the evaluation results do not include systematic deviations.
      Methods  We download the mixed broadcast ephemeris and precise ephemeris of the multi-GNSS experiment (MGEX) for a total of 62 days from 1st September to 1st November in 2019, and select healthy satellite data from broadcast ephemeris every 15 minutes. After this preparation, we calculate the satellite position and clock difference of each GNSS system, then compare root mean square (RMS) of orbital position deviation, RMS of clock difference, and RMS of signal-in-space range error (SISRE) of all kinds of satellites with precise ephemeris. To correct the position of antenna phase center, the correction value should be selected corresponding to the generation of broadcast ephemeris. To eliminate the systematic deviation of clock difference, we make a quadratic difference on the average value of daily clock difference of single satellite.
      Results  The radial, along-track, cross-track position deviation and clock difference of the four major GNSS broadcast ephemeris fluctuate around 0 scale, indicating that the calculation results do not include systematic deviation, the methods of correcting the position of antenna phase center and eliminating systematic deviation of clock difference are correct and effective.
      Conclusions  The order of accuracies of the four major GNSS broadcast ephemeris from high to low is Galileo, GPS, BDS, GLONASS. With the development of each navigation system, the accuracy of broadcas ephemeris can be further improved.

     

/

返回文章
返回