陈善学, 尹修玄, 杨亚娟. 基于码字匹配和引力筛选的半监督协同训练算法[J]. 武汉大学学报 ( 信息科学版), 2015, 40(10): 1386-1391,1408. DOI: 10.13203/j.whugis20130840
引用本文: 陈善学, 尹修玄, 杨亚娟. 基于码字匹配和引力筛选的半监督协同训练算法[J]. 武汉大学学报 ( 信息科学版), 2015, 40(10): 1386-1391,1408. DOI: 10.13203/j.whugis20130840
CHEN Shanxue, YIN Xiuxuan, YANG Yajuan. Semi-Supervised Collaboration Training Algorithm Based on Codeword Matching and Gravitation Selecting[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2015, 40(10): 1386-1391,1408. DOI: 10.13203/j.whugis20130840
Citation: CHEN Shanxue, YIN Xiuxuan, YANG Yajuan. Semi-Supervised Collaboration Training Algorithm Based on Codeword Matching and Gravitation Selecting[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2015, 40(10): 1386-1391,1408. DOI: 10.13203/j.whugis20130840

基于码字匹配和引力筛选的半监督协同训练算法

Semi-Supervised Collaboration Training Algorithm Based on Codeword Matching and Gravitation Selecting

  • 摘要: 针对传统的Co-training和Tri-training协同训练算法中基分类器独立性低、迭代过程中误差累积和整体泛化性能低的问题,将多视图理论、编码理论和万有引力公式引入协同训练分类算法中,提出了改进算法,算法有效地防止了迭代过程中的误差累积,同时提高了分类系统的泛化性能。在高光谱图像分类实验中,随机地从数据集中抽取5%、10%和20%样本作为已标记训练集时,码字匹配的协同训练分类算法对比Co-training和Tri-training算法,在分类精度上平均分别提高了12.38%和6.13%,在Kappa系数上平均分别提高了0.2和0.07。进一步加入引力筛选机制,对比Co-training和Tri-training算法,在分类精度上平均分别提高了21.30%和10.99%,在Kappa系数上平均分别提高了0.26和0.13,结果表明了本文算法的有效性。

     

    Abstract: Traditional collaboration training algorithms, such as Co-training and Tri-training, has some problems: low independence of the base classifier, error accumulation during iteration and low generalization system performance. Accordingly, this paper proposes an import multi-view theory,coding theory and formula for universal gravitation as applied to the collaboration training algorithm preventing both error accumulation and improving generalization performance at the same time. During a hyper-spectral image classification experiment, randomly selecting 5%,10% and 20% samples from data sets as a labled train set, the collaboration training algorithm for codeword matching had a 12.38% and 6.13% higher accuracy matching rate than Co-training and Tri-training respectively. At the same time, it had a respective 0.2 and 0.07 higher Kappa coefficient. In contrast, a collaboration training algorithm for classification based on codeword matching and gravitation selecting had 21.30% and 10.99% higher accuracy than Co-training and Tri-training and 0.26 and 0.17 higher Kappa coefficient. These results demonstrate the validity of the proposed algorithm.

     

/

返回文章
返回